Blenheim Orange wrote:
A couple of questions, if I may.
What advantages, if any, did you find moving from the old Jasc version to the newer Corel versions? Any disadvantages?
How did PS improve your workflow when compared to PSP?
I agree with you about Corel support.
Thanks.
Mike
The move to the Corel version from the Jasc version was in my early days of post editing so it couldn't really say other than the user interface being more intuitive. Corel changes it occasionally. I think it was around PSP X that they made a sizable change and I had trouble finding some things I used a lot in pull down menus but after getting used to it I was back to normal. Corel also keeps adding automatic buttons for certain features like white balance or auto correcting other things. Instead of pulling down a menu or using a keystroke command to do so, you just click the button and it's done. I kind of like it when they do that.
My conversion to PS from PSP happened gradually actually. While using PSP, I downloaded a trial of PS CS5.1 and bought a PS CS5.1 for Dummies book. I had closed my business in Michigan, hadn't moved to Florida yet, and I had a month to trial the software so I went at it hard and heavy every day for the whole 30 days.
When that was over, I realized how much like PS that PSP is but PS is more complex and has many more features that I still don't use that PSP didn't have and may never have. That sounds like a weird comment but my mind determined that PS was so powerful that I was barely scratching the surface and had things like an intelligent healing brush and intelligent magic selection wand that PSP didn't. I knew PS must be so good that while PSP was at it's end in what it was capable of even with my amateur usage, and PS was a monster I wasn't barely tapping into, that I needed to get involved with it. It was a good move after PS became available as CC and I didn't have to lay out $600 to get into PS.
I also found later on that PSP X5 and X6 were slowing down badly because of how many photos that were on my hard drive. At one point, I had about 35,000 photos on my C drive and had them backed up on an external drive. Unfortunately, PSP would go through my whole C drive and verify where everything was for it's "tree" type filing abilities before the editing desktop became available. I couldn't do anything but sit there waiting. It got to the point of taking almost 5 minutes before I could start to edit. Then if I created a new subfolder to save that photo in, it would spend almost another 5 minutes looking at everything before it would create the new subfolder and place it on the "tree" so I could put a file in it. I finally had to clear off all the photos on my drive (they were backed up already as I said) to get it to speed back up. I thought that was lame. PS Bridge works the same way but it is ready to work almost immediately upon opening it. No more than 4 or 5 seconds of pause.
PSP is only $79 and it only makes sense that it can't be as powerful as a $600 package that virtually the whole professional world uses. Corel sees advancements being made in other software like PS and then finds a way to clone those advancements so they're always one step behind the leaders. That doesn't make it bad or ineffective, just not as powerful.
It's hard to explain. You drive a quiet beautiful standard-engine Corvette with Michelin touring tires for several years and you really enjoy the sportiness of it, the handling, the powerful V-8, the T-tops, etc. and then somebody hands you the keys to a brand new rumbling roaring V-12 Viper with racing suspension, tires that are matched to a specific corner of the car for maximum traction and handling, a speedometer that exceeds 180mph, and enough torque to tear your driver seat brackets off the floor during acceleration. You just know something is very different and it will take you where you've never been before in ways you've never imagined possible. You still love your Vette but this thing is something altogether different. They are both doing the same job for you but you know the Viper is going to do it in a more powerful manner and better.
If Adobe raised the price of PS CC so I didn't want to pay that much, I wouldn't feel bad about going back to PSP X6 or X7 but it would still be a step backward of sorts. I'd likely go back to Lightroom and PSP X6 as a combination again.
About workflow... I've used PS CC since June and I'd say my workflow is 40% faster now than when I was using Lightroom and PSP X6 before that. When I want plug-ins they work immediately in PS CC. I fought some plug-ins that were supposed to work in PSP and I never got them working so I gave up.