Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Can't afford to waste $$ so which way to go
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Oct 23, 2014 17:50:20   #
mtbear
 
You might try renting lenses to test them out.

Reply
Oct 23, 2014 19:35:46   #
sloscheider Loc: Minnesota
 
UGUSA wrote:
The pics I'm most critical of are when I'm shooting, for example, kids soccer. Practically all of this is done at max tele, with the camera on auto everything, but set for "sports"


I confess I haven't read all the responses but my suggestion for sports like soccer would be to invest in an 80-200 2.8 variant. They're great all around lenses but not exactly cheap. They'll follow you to a full frame camera body if you ever go that route. You'll have a 1.6 crop factor (I believe) on your present camera body.

There are used f4 versions out there for cheap, I don't know how good they are.

Reply
Oct 24, 2014 10:06:24   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
UGUSA wrote:
Was into phtography (Canon A1's) back in the 80's and 90's then kinda moved away from it. Got back into it last year and, being happy with the brand, bought the Canon EOS T4i kit with the Canon 55-250mm lens.

Being completely new to digital photgraphy I purchased a couple of books (suggested by this site) but try as I may, I just can't get anything like what I consider good pics from the subject lens. The pics always seem to come out soft and I want nice sharp pics even at full tele.

Looked at various reviews and it seems this lens has a reputation of being a "kit lens" and therefore not that great a performer.

I don't have a whole stack of $$ to throw away "testing" other lenses. Looked at various other lenses such as Sigma and Tamron but having lost touch with the industry these days, just have really no idea of which way to go to get a reasonably priced lens that produces sharp results.

Suggestions please.
Was into phtography (Canon A1's) back in the 80's ... (show quote)


Kit lenses aren't so bad that they look soft. Kit lenses are typically quite good but the higher end lenses can let you recognize a "bonus" image quality improvement over the common everyday lens that is typically subtle. Unless one has decades of experience with high end lenses, most shooters can't even tell the difference until they have experience under their belt. Those who have higher end lenses are the ones who "talk down" at kit lenses being crappy while kit lens users are the dominant part of the market, so they aren't typically fuzzy, soft, and unsharp. For normal everyday shooting they're usually more than adequate - even more so today than 10 years ago because of technical advances in lens manufacturing. I have a friend with a Nikon D5100 and a kit lens and his nature shots of butterflies and bugs are phenomenal beyond anything I could have imagined - and he's just a beginner using the camera on full auto.

The Canon SX-50 (and I assume the newer SX-60) is so sharp that photos posted on here of nature shots show every single hair of an animal and every single feather of a bird tac sharp when zoomed to 600 - 1000mm equivalent and they have a small sensor compared to yours. Those cameras are only $400 or less with a massive zoom lens so certainly a T4i reaching no more than 250mm should be able to blow away a $400 Canon Bridge model.

I'd suggest first going into your camera menu system and find the "sharpness" control. I don't have Canon so I don't know where it is or what it's called but you can set it higher to create more sharpness. I had to do that on one of my earlier digitals and left it on "one step" sharper than normal the whole time I had it.

Also consider your computer monitor and whether it's up to the job of displaying sharply. Keep in mind that you used to look at prints of your film shots but now you depend on a monitor to view them before printing instead. Take a USB thumb drive of your photos straight out of the camera to Best Buy and look at your shots on a PC connected to a big Samsung monitor or on an Apple iMac with a Retina display. You may find out it's not the lens at all!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.