Peek-a-boo! After paralleling a male lion in Botswana we circled to get in front of him and were then startled when he came out of the brush right by our Land Rover.
(
Download)
This would be an excellent portrait of a lion showing how it's colouring blends with it's surroundings, but, and it's a big but, the lion is badly out of focus. The cameras AF has focused on the grass not the lion.
Graham
Thanks. I can see this but the photo opportunity was a split second. What could I have done to prevent this?
bbirch wrote:
Thanks. I can see this but the photo opportunity was a split second. What could I have done to prevent this?
I understand completely about only having a split second to make the shot, manual focus would be better in a situation like this.
Graham Smith wrote:
I understand completely about only having a split second to make the shot, manual focus would be better in a situation like this.
I agree with Graham; MF is the only choice under the circumstances.
Dave
Uuglypher wrote:
I agree with Graham; MF is the only choice under the circumstances.
Dave
Would a faster auto-focus help, and one with more focus point options.
BrettOssman wrote:
Would a faster auto-focus help, and one with more focus point options.
I think you are still risking it going for the grass.
Wonderful animal, but your camera's autofocus did you no favors here, it decided to focus on the grass in front of the lion (which is tack sharp) but left this magnificent animal blurred.
I usually keep my camera set on SAF+MF and one focus point for this reason. That way my camera focuses on what it thinks I want based on that one focus point, but I can check it and adjust in a split second with the MF adjustment. Sometimes the blurred stuff in the front still impairs the shot, but at least you've got a fighting chance if the thing you wanted in focus is indeed in focus.
That's usually what happens to me. AF is programmed to get what's in front, no matter how small and insignificant it is. Trying to get it to focus on something else is a bear. And I'm far too slow for manual focus to ever get it done. My shot would have matched yours, most likely.
As far as the contest is concerned, I think perhaps the lion is too obvious to fit the intent of the contest. As I look at other entries, the ones that I would have voted for are far more subtle.
Thanks to all for great advice. I think I probably would have been too slow to get the shot with manual focus so it just may be one of those times you can't get the shot you wanted. Fortunately we followed this lion for an hour and I got another shot that was published in Shutterbug magazine. You win some and lose some. Great new ideas here for me that I want to try though.
bbirch wrote:
Thanks to all for great advice. I think I probably would have been too slow to get the shot with manual focus so it just may be one of those times you can't get the shot you wanted. Fortunately we followed this lion for an hour and I got another shot that was published in Shutterbug magazine. You win some and lose some. Great new ideas here for me that I want to try though.
XXXXXXX
Hey, bbirch; you are a published photographer!
lose a bit...win a lot!
Congratulations!
Dave in SD
I have to agree with Graham on this one. The blurred lion is a shot killer for me. Love the light, the colors, the crop ... it's just too bad that the focus wasn't on the lion. He is the subject.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.