Did you see the news article about Annie Leibovitz, who was mainly portrait, has now went digital and shooting other subjects and interests.
Her "Portraits Without the People" exhibit is interesting.
Will this include more soft porn shots of under aged girls?
Grow up. I realize that is sarcasm, but it's not appropriate for this type of forum.
I did not mean this as an endorsment or critique of her work, just a statement of a change in her subjects and equiptment. The soft porno should be subject and dicussed in the form as different subject. Two different subjects from my view point.
Sorry if I seemed harsh. OT you are correct...it should be a separate thread. And the soft porn itself didn't bother me, it was the combination of that with under aged girls.
fcrawley wrote:
Grow up. I realize that is sarcasm, but it's not appropriate for this type of forum.
Damn right let's keep everything squeaky clean and santorumized
My point is many post go to direction different that what the orginal subject was. If you want to discus the techinal part that is one post, the moral aspect another post, two different subjects. They belong in two different threads.
Not only does Ms Leibovitz has extraordinary photographic skills but her imagination puts her miles ahead of most of her peers. Her portrait of Meryl Streep stretching skin on a masked face is just one out-of-this-world example.
forbescat wrote:
Not only does Ms Leibovitz has extraordinary photographic skills but her imagination puts her miles ahead of most of her peers. Her portrait of Meryl Streep stretching skin on a masked face is just one out-of-this-world example.
I haven't seen all of her work but what I've seen is mostly really amazing.
larrycumba wrote:
Will this include more soft porn shots of under aged girls?
Good grief, I must have missed this. It is not what she is normally known for. Then again, I have not seen the pictures in question.
Cheers,
R.
Roger Hicks wrote:
larrycumba wrote:
Will this include more soft porn shots of under aged girls?
Good grief, I must have missed this. It is not what she is normally known for. Then again, I have not seen the pictures in question.
Cheers,
R.
That might be referring to the Miley Cyrus shoot? There was some controversy about that at the time.
JBTaylor wrote:
That might be referring to the Miley Cyrus shoot? There was some controversy about that at the time.
Thanks for the information. I Googled Miley Cyrus (of whom I was previously unaware) and Leibovitz.
So that's soft porn, eh? Whew... every partially nude shot, ever, is 'soft porn'?
And 15 is 'under age'? For what? Photography?
Cheers,
R.
docrob wrote:
fcrawley wrote:
Grow up. I realize that is sarcasm, but it's not appropriate for this type of forum.
Damn right let's keep everything squeaky clean and santorumized
Doc,
What say we also keep it de politicized also, that leads to some very heated exchanges.
George
My Dad always said you do want to talk abour a man's dog, religion, or politics, still good advice 75 yrs later.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.