Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
To bee or not to bee...55-300 lens with 20mm ext tube
Sep 21, 2014 12:25:01 #
This post was meant to compare macro shots with the SX50. However, everything considered, as much as I like the Canon, I didn't get anything with it which belongs in this thread. Except the turkey. Maybe someone else can........
Sep 21, 2014 13:01:16 #
Sep 21, 2014 13:10:27 #
Jimjay wrote:
This post was meant to compare macro shots with the SX50. However, everything considered, as much as I like the Canon, I didn't get anything with it which belongs in this thread. Except the turkey. Maybe someone else can........
Great shots Jimjay, super colors and detail, well done
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Sep 21, 2014 13:12:19 #
Sep 21, 2014 13:39:09 #
rlaugh wrote:
Great set!
Thanks for stopping by, rlaugh. Your comments are always appreciated.
Sep 21, 2014 13:41:57 #
gregoryd45 wrote:
Great shots Jimjay, super colors and detail, well done
Thanks for the kind comment, Gregory. It's always appreciated.
Sep 21, 2014 13:44:14 #
angler wrote:
Excellent set Jimjay.
Thanks, Jim. Appreciate your taking the time to comment.
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 21, 2014 13:59:08 #
Sep 21, 2014 14:26:09 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Lookin' good :)
Thanks, Linda. You know I always appreciate your looks and comments.
Sep 21, 2014 17:03:35 #
Clarify for me, these were taken with the extension tubes, where does the sx50 come in?
I love the third and fourth bee shots!!!
I love the third and fourth bee shots!!!
Sep 21, 2014 18:31:08 #
angela k wrote:
Clarify for me, these were taken with the extension tubes, where does the sx50 come in?
I love the third and fourth bee shots!!!
I love the third and fourth bee shots!!!
You're not gonna like me anymore......But none of the SX50 shots were good enough to post in a thread with the ext. tube shots.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Sep 21, 2014 18:38:20 #
Jimjay wrote:
You're not gonna like me anymore......But none of the SX50 shots were good enough to post in a thread with the ext. tube shots.
Really??!!!!!!!!
Why, I have no problem shooting macro with the sx50, the tubes on the other hand I need time to work on that!
...and have you tried the tubes with other lenses other than the 300?
Sep 21, 2014 19:21:48 #
angela k wrote:
Really??!!!!!!!!
Why, I have no problem shooting macro with the sx50, the tubes on the other hand I need time to work on that!
...and have you tried the tubes with other lenses other than the 300?
Why, I have no problem shooting macro with the sx50, the tubes on the other hand I need time to work on that!
...and have you tried the tubes with other lenses other than the 300?
double post
Sep 21, 2014 19:21:48 #
angela k wrote:
Really??!!!!!!!!
Why, I have no problem shooting macro with the sx50, the tubes on the other hand I need time to work on that!
...and have you tried the tubes with other lenses other than the 300?
Why, I have no problem shooting macro with the sx50, the tubes on the other hand I need time to work on that!
...and have you tried the tubes with other lenses other than the 300?
Yep, I've tried them with my 18-55 kit lens as well as a 35mm prime lens. The advantage of the longer lens is that you don't have to get right down in the bee's face to take the shot. These were done at a distance of about one to three feet. Yes, they're cropped.
Sep 21, 2014 19:42:43 #
Jimjay wrote:
Yep, I've tried them with my 18-55 kit lens as well as a 35mm prime lens. The advantage of the longer lens is that you don't have to get right down in the bee's face to take the shot. These were done at a distance of about one to three feet. Yes, they're cropped.
Gotch....
:thumbup:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.