Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
How does The K-5 IIs Pentax fit in the rating?
Sep 19, 2014 11:56:57   #
dbeals Loc: Washington State
 
I've heard a lot about discussion regarding Canon 7d and Nikon for wildlife photography. But nothing regarding Pentax K-5 II. Does anyone have any experience or opinion regarding this camera. I've narrowed my selection to the Canon 7d or 7dII. I'm just getting back into photography after a decade out of water. It's like gold fever-photography is calling me back.
Dave in Wa state

Reply
Sep 19, 2014 12:53:57   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
dbeals wrote:
I've heard a lot about discussion regarding Canon 7d and Nikon for wildlife photography. But nothing regarding Pentax K-5 II. Does anyone have any experience or opinion regarding this camera. I've narrowed my selection to the Canon 7d or 7dII. I'm just getting back into photography after a decade out of water. It's like gold fever-photography is calling me back.
Dave in Wa state

When I list the major camera manufacturers, Pentax is on the list, at the end (7th). One reason is a business issue: in 2007 they became part of Hoya, and in 2008 the imaging division was sold to Ricoh. That leaves doubt about the long-term viability.

Going by the information which is out there about the Canon 7D Mark II ($1800), I think it will end the year as the best "small sensor" (1.5x - 2x crop factor) wildlife camera, unless a Nikon D9300 appears to challenge it. Of course, it is in the $1500-2000 category, while most of the others are in the $1000-1300 category.

Reply
Sep 19, 2014 14:05:34   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
dbeals wrote:
I've heard a lot about discussion regarding Canon 7d and Nikon for wildlife photography. But nothing regarding Pentax K-5 II. Does anyone have any experience or opinion regarding this camera. I've narrowed my selection to the Canon 7d or 7dII. I'm just getting back into photography after a decade out of water. It's like gold fever-photography is calling me back.
Dave in Wa state


For image quality results, compare it directly to the Nikon D7000 and the Pentax K-5 bodies use the same Sony sensor as the D7000 used.

The Pentax K-3 with its 23.35MP sensor shoots 8.3 fps

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2014 20:37:23   #
alandg46 Loc: Boerne, Texas
 
Don't know about a K-5IIs, but a K-5 is just about as good as it gets in APS-C. Terrific dynamic range. Great colors. Great ergonomics. Intelligent menu. The focus is a little weak, particularly moving toward you. K-3 is a huge improvement regarding focus.

I will say this Nikon's menu sucks. I know. I also have an D800E. Love the camera. Hate the menus.

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 17:08:54   #
patricklgv
 
Just pick each one up and see how each fits into you hand. Select the one that feels best: that's the one you will use. They all take great photos, depending on the operator. Personally, I think you can't beat Pentax and its collection of small and discreet and extremely high quality prime lenses. Of course, if you want a camera that makes you look like a big shot, get a huge full frame camera with a gigantic zoom lens, but at the end of the day, you may regret lugging it around; and if you travel abroad, yours will be the first camera ripped off.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.