Obama and "the face of evil"
Sep 14, 2014 19:09:36 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 12:44 PM
RELIGION
ISIS is not Islamic, said Barack Obama as he gave yet another vapid speech to say what he will or will not do next about the threat of Islam. What he said is both i***tic and a lie. ISIS calls itself theIslamic State.
Obama used the word war only once, but ISIS is all about waran Islamic holy war that has been waged since 632 AD.
The one person neither named, nor blamed is the so-called prophet, Mohammad, yet everything being done by the jihadists today is being done in his name.
In his memoir, Dreams from my Father, Obama, in the preface to its second edition, wrote: Nor do I pretend to understand the stark nihilism that drove the terrorists that day (9/11) and that drives their brethren still. My powers of empathy, my ability to reach into anothers heart, cannot penetrate the blank stares of those who would murder innocents with abstract, serene satisfaction. And therein is the problem that he, as President, and we as citizens must address.
SPECIAL: Modern Day Patriots, this is the time to stand shoulder to shoulder with our forefathers in Lexington and Concord. We need the Tea Party now more than ever.
Political correctness is so dominant in the Obama White House that no one in the U.S. government dares say anything that might be deemed critical of a so-called religion that sanctions beheadings, amputations, stoning, kidnapping hostages, ransoms, polygamy, and s***ery. To anyone deemed an infidel or unbeliever or a Muslim who questions anything about Islam, death is the only option other than dhimmitude, a second-class citizenship.
The pure evil of Islam was seen most recently in the two videos of American hostages being beheaded by the Islamic State, but despite decades of attacks on U.S. embassies, the taking of U.S. hostages in Beirut and Tehran, attacks in Bali, Madrid and London, and the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and on the Pentagon, Americans have been slow to realize the intensity and size of the threat that the Middle Eastern and North African nations represent along with wherever else a large Muslim population exists.
As the U.S. and threatened Middle Eastern nations hurtle toward a military confrontation with the Islamic State, the name it has given to territory it has seized from northern Syria and into Iraq, a new book, Fault Lines: The Laymans Guide to Understanding Americas Role in the Ever-Changing Middle East, ($00.00, Elevate, Boise, Idaho, softcover) provides one of the best, short histories on U.S. involvement and why, at this point, its influence has reached a low point.
Liebich writes of the way the U.S. policy regarding the Middle East changed over the years, particularly in the wake of World War II and the Cold War that followed as the Soviet Union challenged us for the implementation of c*******m worldwide. Dependent on the flow of oil from the Middle East, much of our strategic interest in the region was based on exercising our influence, often bringing about the removal of leaders whom we regarded as a threat to that necessity. After 9/11 that went into overdrive.
Liebich notes that our concept of nation-building proved costly, not just in the lives of our troops, but which included $50 billion in Iraq and it didnt work. Before you can build a nation you have to have a nation and only the citizens of that nation can decide what kind of a country they want to have. The problem the U.S. encountered was that In the Middle East, people related much more to the Ummah (the Muslim community) and to their own tribes.
The problem that George H.W. Bush and his son, George W. Bush, encountered was that The Middle East is a part of the world where many odd alliances appear. One is never sure who is allied with whom and wh**ever one thinks may all change tomorrow.
Liebich takes note of the Arab Awakening that followed the U.S. invasion of Iraq that deposed Saddam Hussein. It began with so much promise followed by its subsequent descent into chaos, has drastically changed the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East and North Africa.
Liebich says My definition of a vital national interest is one that deals with an existential threat to the United States, and one for which the U.S. is willing to spill its blood and to spend its treasure in order to accomplish its objectives. By this definition, the U.S. has no vital national interest in events in the Middle East. Written prior to the emergence of the Islamic State, a new existential threat is facing the U.S.
Liebich says our strategic interests in the Middle East for many years included access to stable supplies of oil at reasonable prices; support for the state of Israel; preventing adversaries or potential adversaries from coming to power or achieving influence in the region; improving life for the people of the region; and preventing terrorist attacks on U.S. territories and citizens.
The region has become the epicenter for terrorist groups, some of which have ambitions for a global reach. That alone will require a renewed military involvement by the U.S. as we are the only nation with the capacity to alter the facts on the ground.
It comes at a time when the U.S. is close to having developed its oil reserves to a point where the oil of the Middle East will not determine our policies, but it is that oil which other nations such as those of Europe depend upon. China and India need it as well so its protection by and for the West as well as the developing Asian nations affects our decisions. Even Russia whose economy is dependent on oil and natural gas has cast its support for Syria along with Iran.
Everything, though, depends on understanding the true nature and intent of Islam.
Liebich ends his book with a quote from Winston Churchill who said, We can always count on the Americans to do the right thing, after they have exhausted all other possibilities.
Right now, the right thing is the destruction of the Islamic State.
http://www.tpnn.com/2014/09/12/islam-is-the-face-of-evil/
- See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/islam-face-evil-55098/#sthash.kVwx1lmm.dpuf
RELIGION
ISIS is not Islamic, said Barack Obama as he gave yet another vapid speech to say what he will or will not do next about the threat of Islam. What he said is both i***tic and a lie. ISIS calls itself theIslamic State.
Obama used the word war only once, but ISIS is all about waran Islamic holy war that has been waged since 632 AD.
The one person neither named, nor blamed is the so-called prophet, Mohammad, yet everything being done by the jihadists today is being done in his name.
In his memoir, Dreams from my Father, Obama, in the preface to its second edition, wrote: Nor do I pretend to understand the stark nihilism that drove the terrorists that day (9/11) and that drives their brethren still. My powers of empathy, my ability to reach into anothers heart, cannot penetrate the blank stares of those who would murder innocents with abstract, serene satisfaction. And therein is the problem that he, as President, and we as citizens must address.
SPECIAL: Modern Day Patriots, this is the time to stand shoulder to shoulder with our forefathers in Lexington and Concord. We need the Tea Party now more than ever.
Political correctness is so dominant in the Obama White House that no one in the U.S. government dares say anything that might be deemed critical of a so-called religion that sanctions beheadings, amputations, stoning, kidnapping hostages, ransoms, polygamy, and s***ery. To anyone deemed an infidel or unbeliever or a Muslim who questions anything about Islam, death is the only option other than dhimmitude, a second-class citizenship.
The pure evil of Islam was seen most recently in the two videos of American hostages being beheaded by the Islamic State, but despite decades of attacks on U.S. embassies, the taking of U.S. hostages in Beirut and Tehran, attacks in Bali, Madrid and London, and the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and on the Pentagon, Americans have been slow to realize the intensity and size of the threat that the Middle Eastern and North African nations represent along with wherever else a large Muslim population exists.
As the U.S. and threatened Middle Eastern nations hurtle toward a military confrontation with the Islamic State, the name it has given to territory it has seized from northern Syria and into Iraq, a new book, Fault Lines: The Laymans Guide to Understanding Americas Role in the Ever-Changing Middle East, ($00.00, Elevate, Boise, Idaho, softcover) provides one of the best, short histories on U.S. involvement and why, at this point, its influence has reached a low point.
Liebich writes of the way the U.S. policy regarding the Middle East changed over the years, particularly in the wake of World War II and the Cold War that followed as the Soviet Union challenged us for the implementation of c*******m worldwide. Dependent on the flow of oil from the Middle East, much of our strategic interest in the region was based on exercising our influence, often bringing about the removal of leaders whom we regarded as a threat to that necessity. After 9/11 that went into overdrive.
Liebich notes that our concept of nation-building proved costly, not just in the lives of our troops, but which included $50 billion in Iraq and it didnt work. Before you can build a nation you have to have a nation and only the citizens of that nation can decide what kind of a country they want to have. The problem the U.S. encountered was that In the Middle East, people related much more to the Ummah (the Muslim community) and to their own tribes.
The problem that George H.W. Bush and his son, George W. Bush, encountered was that The Middle East is a part of the world where many odd alliances appear. One is never sure who is allied with whom and wh**ever one thinks may all change tomorrow.
Liebich takes note of the Arab Awakening that followed the U.S. invasion of Iraq that deposed Saddam Hussein. It began with so much promise followed by its subsequent descent into chaos, has drastically changed the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East and North Africa.
Liebich says My definition of a vital national interest is one that deals with an existential threat to the United States, and one for which the U.S. is willing to spill its blood and to spend its treasure in order to accomplish its objectives. By this definition, the U.S. has no vital national interest in events in the Middle East. Written prior to the emergence of the Islamic State, a new existential threat is facing the U.S.
Liebich says our strategic interests in the Middle East for many years included access to stable supplies of oil at reasonable prices; support for the state of Israel; preventing adversaries or potential adversaries from coming to power or achieving influence in the region; improving life for the people of the region; and preventing terrorist attacks on U.S. territories and citizens.
The region has become the epicenter for terrorist groups, some of which have ambitions for a global reach. That alone will require a renewed military involvement by the U.S. as we are the only nation with the capacity to alter the facts on the ground.
It comes at a time when the U.S. is close to having developed its oil reserves to a point where the oil of the Middle East will not determine our policies, but it is that oil which other nations such as those of Europe depend upon. China and India need it as well so its protection by and for the West as well as the developing Asian nations affects our decisions. Even Russia whose economy is dependent on oil and natural gas has cast its support for Syria along with Iran.
Everything, though, depends on understanding the true nature and intent of Islam.
Liebich ends his book with a quote from Winston Churchill who said, We can always count on the Americans to do the right thing, after they have exhausted all other possibilities.
Right now, the right thing is the destruction of the Islamic State.
http://www.tpnn.com/2014/09/12/islam-is-the-face-of-evil/
- See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/islam-face-evil-55098/#sthash.kVwx1lmm.dpuf
Sep 14, 2014 19:16:10 #
The KKK calls itself Christian. Does not make it so.
Does not get much press here, but Islamic leaders in various corners of the world are denouncing ISIL.
The lead Egyptian cleric, just a couple of weeks ago, denounced ISIL as not being a Muslim group and asked the west to quit calling it the Islamic State of anything. He suggested calling it the Al-Quaeda State instead. He said something along the lines that this terror group was misguided and was bastardizing Islam for their own evil purposes.
Does not get much press here, but Islamic leaders in various corners of the world are denouncing ISIL.
The lead Egyptian cleric, just a couple of weeks ago, denounced ISIL as not being a Muslim group and asked the west to quit calling it the Islamic State of anything. He suggested calling it the Al-Quaeda State instead. He said something along the lines that this terror group was misguided and was bastardizing Islam for their own evil purposes.
Sep 14, 2014 19:31:05 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
mwalsh wrote:
The KKK calls itself Christian. Does not make it ... (show quote)
Erroneous facts and claims. And even those are meaningless because wink-and-a-nod opposition is part of the propaganda theme that Islamic terrorists are somehow not Islamic ... even though they are simply following the Koran, Muhammad, and the current leading Imams.
"A muslim who doesn't believe in holy war is not a muslim at all."
Sep 14, 2014 19:33:15 #
Not erroneous at all. Google if you care to.
You obviously h**e Muslims based on the long litany of misguided, disinformative posts that you put up. I take it from your silly post on female pilots that you h**e women as well, though you claim not to.
Is there any group that you are cool with, or are you an equal opportunity h**er?
You obviously h**e Muslims based on the long litany of misguided, disinformative posts that you put up. I take it from your silly post on female pilots that you h**e women as well, though you claim not to.
Is there any group that you are cool with, or are you an equal opportunity h**er?
Sep 15, 2014 16:53:05 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
mwalsh wrote:
Not erroneous at all. Google if you care to.
You obviously h**e Muslims based on the long litany of misguided, disinformative posts that you put up. I take it from your silly post on female pilots that you h**e women as well, though you claim not to.
Is there any group that you are cool with, or are you an equal opportunity h**er?
You obviously h**e Muslims based on the long litany of misguided, disinformative posts that you put up. I take it from your silly post on female pilots that you h**e women as well, though you claim not to.
Is there any group that you are cool with, or are you an equal opportunity h**er?
What I actually detest is people who resort to innuendo and i***tic accusations rather than addressing verified facts and significant issues. Of which your post, unfortunately, is an example.
Sep 15, 2014 16:56:42 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
mwalsh wrote:
...The lead Egyptian cleric, just a couple of weeks ago, denounced ISIL as not being a Muslim group and asked the west to quit calling it the Islamic State of anything. He suggested calling it the Al-Quaeda State instead. He said something along the lines that this terror group was misguided and was bastardizing Islam for their own evil purposes.
Egypt, and much of the Arab and Muslim world, is scared to death of ISIS/ISIL. It is not surprising that he is badmouthing ISIS. Nor is his ridiculous claim that ISIS is not Islam surprising. This is a standard propaganda ploy of not only ISIS' direct enemies, but apologists for Islam in the West. ISIS is of course not only ISlam, but following out the mandate for Jihad that is present in the Koran and Hathis. Indeed, Jihad is such a central theme in Islam that in their "holy" books the commandment to holy war is second only to the demand that people worship the Islamic version of god.
Sep 15, 2014 21:33:31 #
The muslims who fear ISIS the most are the muslim dictatorships like Saudi Arabia. ISIS is thought to be "cooking the frog too fast" by muslims in the USA who are having great success at low level jihad and fear the backlash.
Sep 15, 2014 22:06:13 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
Bill Coleman wrote:
The muslims who fear ISIS the most are the muslim dictatorships like Saudi Arabia. ISIS is thought to be "cooking the frog too fast" by muslims in the USA who are having great success at low level jihad and fear the backlash.
VERY perceptive post...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.