Part I Of Darwin's Doctrine Of Delusion Debunked
Aug 30, 2014 20:52:37 #
silver
Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
Racmanaz wrote:
You just can never stop lying about me can you? you are back on temporary ignore.
HAHA can't answer the question. Some sage you are.
Aug 30, 2014 21:16:51 #
What your brilliant, knowing, Biblical all mind has skipped right over is what it takes to preserve these "missing link" fossils and such is the natural destruction of them by nature- it probably skips your mind that the only reason they are finding clues in No Africa is the dry climate for centuries - no where in the world has bones been found as old as there - and if they are old how much older do you think there were before the climate got so dry to preserve those that have been found.
The garden of Eden is properly described as the "Fertile Crescent"
The garden of Eden is properly described as the "Fertile Crescent"
Racmanaz wrote:
Of course I did, and still not a transitional form from one to another to show the minute changes, the changes were too great to come to the conclusion that they were transitional forms. Were are the transitional forms between the 50 mil and 25 mil, and the 25 mil to the 10 mill, and the 10 mil to now???? there are none. To say these bones are transitional forms are highly speculative.
Aug 30, 2014 21:21:30 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Harvey wrote:
What you brilliant, knowing all mind has skipped r... (show quote)
LOL really??? natural destruction of a whole line of species from 40 million years ago but not the 50 or 30 million year ones??? LOL explain the possible physics of that?? LOL you can't have the species in between times destroyed with out have the ones before them destroyed lol. IF all the species from lets say 40 milliion years ago have been destroyed the the genetic line STOPS!!!! it will be extinct.
Aug 30, 2014 21:27:58 #
silver
Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
Racmanaz wrote:
LOL really??? natural destruction of a whole line of species from 40 million years ago but not the 50 or 30 million year ones??? LOL explain the possible physics of that?? LOL you can't have the species in between times destroyed with out have the ones before them destroyed lol. IF all the species from lets say 40 milliion years ago have been destroyed the the genetic line STOPS!!!! it will be extinct.
Why won't you answer me about the question about the 1st 3 days not having a sun and a moon so how could there be days. . The sun and the moon were created on the 4th day so how could there be days on the 1st 3 days. You have not answered the question yet so answer it now. You are good at spouting your biblical quotes but you can't answer a simple question that is logical. Maybe you are not the logical person you think you are.
Aug 30, 2014 22:11:33 #
Aug 30, 2014 22:52:38 #
I said not a word about the time periods - I only stated facts - get a life.
Racmanaz wrote:
LOL really??? natural destruction of a whole line of species from 40 million years ago but not the 50 or 30 million year ones??? LOL explain the possible physics of that?? LOL you can't have the species in between times destroyed with out have the ones before them destroyed lol. IF all the species from lets say 40 milliion years ago have been destroyed the the genetic line STOPS!!!! it will be extinct.
Aug 30, 2014 22:54:29 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Harvey wrote:
I said not a word about the time periods - I only stated facts - get a life.
You stated no facts just consistent fabrications.
Aug 30, 2014 22:55:13 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Harvey wrote:
I said not a word about the time periods - I only stated facts - get a life.
You can't refute this truth so you go on a defense.
Aug 30, 2014 23:38:55 #
Aug 31, 2014 02:11:04 #
Can anybody give one single example, where a scientific theory, has been refuted and been replaced by superstition?
I can think of many superstitions that have been replaced by science. But not one single instance of it going the other way springs to mind.
I can think of many superstitions that have been replaced by science. But not one single instance of it going the other way springs to mind.
Aug 31, 2014 02:18:47 #
Wellhiem wrote:
The whole point about science, is it's testable and repeatable. So let's put god to the test. There is no god. God is a figment of your warped imagination, and is only used to justify your own fantasies about paedophilia and incest. I'm not expecting a bolt of lightning, but surely your god could find some way to stop me posting tomorrow. 24 hours and the question will be answered.
I'm still here.
Aug 31, 2014 08:24:53 #
Wellhiem wrote:
The whole point about science, is it's testable and repeatable.
Has science been able to repeat the origin of life?
That should be a simple thing to do if what you're saying is true. Life is springing up around us everyday 24/7, surely science can repeat it at least once.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.