Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main Photography Discussion
So, what is it?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Aug 12, 2014 22:04:04   #
BamaTexan Loc: Deep in the heart of Texas
 
Haydon wrote:
The answer to your question is "Yes".


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Aug 12, 2014 22:14:44   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
GrayPlayer wrote:

Why did the chicken cross the road?


Are you actually asking, or is it completely rhetorical??!
Cause I actually know the answer!! :lol:
SS

Reply
Aug 12, 2014 22:27:11   #
phlash46 Loc: Westchester County, New York
 
n3eg wrote:
Olympus.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Aug 12, 2014 22:40:26   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
Sprocket wrote:
Olympenta-fujicanikon camera

If they make those in the F250 series I am buying one. I heard that it already beat out the Hassel-leicablad in a ISO-aperture-f-stop safety test. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


LOL. F250, as in Ford Truck?

Reply
Aug 12, 2014 22:56:13   #
jsharp Loc: Ballwin MO.
 
I agree what ever you use to take photos My many 3 film cameras were great in their day but I haven't used film in over 15 years. Click away.

1-Canon AE-1, a Pentax ME-Super and K1000

Reply
Aug 12, 2014 23:00:58   #
jsharp Loc: Ballwin MO.
 
What ever one brand you will use my first digital was a Sony Mavica CD-200 used it for 11 years took over 34,000 photos still works great replace it with a Nikon 5100

Reply
Aug 12, 2014 23:06:16   #
jsharp Loc: Ballwin MO.
 
twindad wrote:
Best damn answer I've read in a long time!

My first 35mm camera was a Zennith-B a Russian camera built like a tank.

Reply
 
 
Aug 12, 2014 23:37:23   #
mcveed Loc: Kelowna, British Columbia (between trips)
 
Any "advanced amateur" who asks this question is either lying about the "advanced amateur" or just plain stupid.

P.S. Notice the OP has not chimed is since the first post. He's sitting at his computer laughing at all the rubes he sucked in.

Reply
Aug 13, 2014 00:23:04   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
mcveed wrote:
Any "advanced amateur" who asks this question is either lying, or just plain stupid..


MC, don't be so hard on the guy.
You'd be amaaaazed at just HOW many don't actually know that the answer is CANON!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
SS

Reply
Aug 13, 2014 09:56:00   #
Sprocket Loc: Upstate New York
 
frozenhermitphoto wrote:
Well, according to my tests performed when I bought a Sony the results are as follows:

Canon outperforms Nikon as a boat anchor, but a Nikon will knock a cat off the bird feeder better. (better aerodynamics)
Canon seems to make a nicer splat pattern off an overpass, but Olympus is the absolute best in the field because it will bounce bumper high for a better spread.
Nikon is harder for idiots to remove from their rectum after they quote Ken Rockwell at one of my photo shoots, but if you can get the Canon in there sideways without losing your shoe then its a close call.
Nikon units are easier to saw in half on a meat saw, but that is body only. Results with lenses on are mixed.
Fuji blows them both away on the ordinance test, leaving only a small amount of shrapnel behind.
Nikon gets greater distance from the trebuchet due to better aerodynamics mentioned earlier.

Hope this helps! If you still aren't sure which camera to buy, go to the nearest camera store and ask them which one they recommend.
Well, according to my tests performed when I bough... (show quote)


This is Bull. I am appalled!!!!! I know that my Nikon can beat the Cannon on the splat pattern from an overpass. Your test must have bean faulty. I am writing to Ken Rockwell asking him to do a test because we all know that his tests are not bias in any way. LOL

:mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Reply
Aug 14, 2014 10:09:04   #
frozenhermitphoto
 
Sprocket wrote:
This is Bull. I am appalled!!!!! I know that my Nikon can beat the Cannon on the splat pattern from an overpass. Your test must have bean faulty. I am writing to Ken Rockwell asking him to do a test because we all know that his tests are not bias in any way. LOL

:mrgreen: :mrgreen:


If Mr. Rockwell can be bothered to duplicate the overpass splatter test, see if you can get him to duplicate the rectal insertion test (his own rectum) before tossing the camera off the overpass. (with camera still inserted, of course)

:shock: :oops: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Aug 14, 2014 12:34:37   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
itsjustme wrote:
Well, is Canon or Nikon the better camera? I am an advanced amature.


Which specific Canon compared to which specific Nikon?

Reply
Aug 14, 2014 15:10:29   #
jsharp Loc: Ballwin MO.
 
With or without a telephoto lens

Reply
Aug 14, 2014 15:20:25   #
jimni2001 Loc: Sierra Vista, Arizona, USA
 
Haydon wrote:
The answer to your question is "Yes".


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Aug 14, 2014 21:26:10   #
Sprocket Loc: Upstate New York
 
frozenhermitphoto wrote:
If Mr. Rockwell can be bothered to duplicate the overpass splatter test, see if you can get him to duplicate the rectal insertion test (his own rectum) before tossing the camera off the overpass. (with camera still inserted, of course)

:shock: :oops: :thumbup:


I will ask, but if he says yes and is eager to try then I will not feel comfortable talking with him anymore.

:shock: :shock: :shock:

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.