Erv suggested seeing a front view of the Tucker.
Open for your edits.
I've probably tried to do too much with this. And I don't know how realistic the proportions are. And it's not as flattering as the original...... Maybe I should have left it to the HDR experts :lol: .
But it was fun to play with. Thanks for sharing.
-
R.G. wrote:
I've probably tried to do too much with this. And I don't know how realistic the proportions are. And it's not as flattering as the original...... Maybe I should have left it to the HDR experts :lol: .
But it was fun to play with. Thanks for sharing.
-
Thanks for your efforts. We learn by doing and learning from out mistakes (which are few, lol.) I think an adjustment using PS perspective or one of the other edit tools might correct the proportions.
SoHillGuy wrote:
......I think an adjustment using PS perspective or one of the other edit tools might correct the proportions.
Actually it's not so much a mistake as a misguided idea. I was trying to give a more side-on view, and in the process stretched the dimensions sideways. I quite liked the effect, but I'm not familiar with the real-life dimensions of the car, so it doesn't look wrong to me. To correct it, I'd just have to undo some of what I've done.
Here is my attempt. Really want to see how it compares on upload to what I had on my monitor.
SoHillGuy wrote:
Here is my attempt. Really want to see how it compares on upload to what I had on my monitor.
Shiny (as they'd say aboard Serenity). Good strong colours.
R.G. wrote:
Shiny (as they'd say aboard Serenity). Good strong colours.
I like the fact that you left the drivers windshield as photographed. I debated about leaving it as originally shown and then I attempted to downplay the glare on it, which I now feel was a mistake.
Like I said, we learn from our errors.
SoHillGuy wrote:
.....I debated about leaving it as originally shown and then I attempted to downplay the glare on it, which I now feel was a mistake.
You know what? As errors go, I'd say that one's a bit mediocre. The next time you make a slip-up, try to come up with something more colossal :lol: .
Seriously, I think you have more than enough shininess there already, and losing some of it is probably a good idea.
SoHillGuy wrote:
Like I said, we learn from our errors.
I've always thought there was something to be said for learning from other people's errors :) .
What is the year of this car?
gypsy02 wrote:
What is the year of this car?
1948 only about 50 were built.
SoHillGuy wrote:
Erv suggested seeing a front view of the Tucker.
Open for your edits.
I'm not sure how this will look after posting, but here goes....
Selective level adjustments and then Topaz DeNoise..twice
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.