George W. Bush Is Smarter than You (Page 5): How can I be wrong when you verified exactly what I said.. BUSH did not have anything to do with writing the report..... Since what he did...

venturer9 Loc: Newton, Il.

larrypayne wrote:

Shows how little you know, Mike.

Bush appointed the members of the 9/11 Commission and then refused to testify before them unless he could be accompanied by Dick Cheney behind closed doors and off the record. To this day the public has not been given access to that testimony.

How can I be wrong when you verified exactly what I said.. BUSH did not have anything to do with writing the report..... Since what he did or did not say has never been given access to be read... then "AGAIN" he had nothing to do with the writing of the report...

Maybe I know more than you think Larry....

Mike

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

venturer9 wrote:

How can I be wrong when you verified exactly what I said.. BUSH did not have anything to do with writing the report..... Since what he did or did not say has never been given access to be read... then "AGAIN" he had nothing to do with the writing of the report...

Maybe I know more than you think Larry....

Mike

When Bush appoints the writers, he has everything to do with the results of the report.

When Bush won't testify alone, under oath and on the record in front of a commission he himself appointed, that indicates he has much to hide.
Are you too dense to understand that?

venturer9 Loc: Newton, Il.

larrypayne wrote:

When Bush appoints the writers, he has everything to do with the results of the report.

When Bush won't testify alone, under oath and on the record in front of a commission he himself appointed, that indicates he has much to hide.
Are you too dense to understand that?

Are you to dense to understand that every president appoints those that are to report on one thing or another, and regardless of the Political accusations, Preparing a Fraudulent report is not a given....

And How about the current (and other) Presidents who forbid certain persons, ie Lerner, Holder, etc. to answer subpoenas....

Mike

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

venturer9 wrote:

Are you to dense to understand that every president appoints those that are to report on one thing or another, and regardless of the Political accusations, Preparing a Fraudulent report is not a given....

And How about the current (and other) Presidents who forbid certain persons, ie Lerner, Holder, etc. to answer subpoenas....

Mike

Preparing a fraudulent report is a given if the President and his administration are some of the perpetrators of 9/11--which they were.

The current Pres and his administration are controlled by the same oligarchy who controlled Bush. Why would they act any differently?

venturer9 Loc: Newton, Il.

larrypayne wrote:

Preparing a fraudulent report is a given if the President and his administration are some of the perpetrators of 9/11--which they were.

The current Pres and his administration are controlled by the same oligarchy who controlled Bush. Why would they act any differently?

#####################################

You are one sick individual Larry......

Mike

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

venturer9 wrote:

#####################################

You are one sick individual Larry......

Mike

No rebuttal?

I understand.

There is no effective rebuttal to truth.

venturer9 Loc: Newton, Il.

larrypayne wrote:

No rebuttal?

I understand.

There is no effective rebuttal to truth.

How can one rebut a comment such as you make.... You not only hate the Jews, you hate everything about the US and do your best to convince everyone else that your hatred is the way we should live...

I and anyone else on this forum can ALWAYS rebut about anything you say, but in the long term, it is a useless waste of energy (But I have lots of energy) because you DEMAND that we pay attention to your stuff but will never pay any attention to ours.....

The road has to go both ways, yet yours only runs one way.

Mike

Kombiguy Loc: Cedar Rapids, IA

Another thread hijacked. You'd think these threads were airplanes and LP was a muslim.

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

venturer9 wrote:

How can one rebut a comment such as you make.... Y... (show quote)

Your reply is disingenuous as usual. You try to give the impression that either of our rebuttals would be directed at each other and would have no value unless one of us accepted the other's views.

That, of course, is not how it works. Any rebuttal information or ideas are aimed at readers of this forum. It is up to them to decide who makes more sense. You and the other trolls here continually use that same argument to avoid having to rebut the truth and defend the lies.

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

Kombiguy wrote:

Another thread hijacked. You'd think these threads were airplanes and LP was a muslim.

Is George W. Bush smarter than you, Kombiguy?

(My attempt to get this thread back on topic)

Kombiguy Loc: Cedar Rapids, IA

larrypayne wrote:

Is George W. Bush smarter than you, Kombiguy?

(My attempt to get this thread back on topic)

Maybe, maybe not. Who knows? My SATs were a little higher, but they were taken when I was older than Bush. My LSATs were a little lower, but I was working full time when I took it. My undergraduate grades were better, but I went to a different school. My law school grades, not as good, but again, a different school and I was working full time while going to school full time. An awful lot of variables. In the long run, however, I can be pretty sure he's no dummy.

venturer9 Loc: Newton, Il.

larrypayne wrote:

Your reply is disingenuous as usual. You try to give the impression that either of our rebuttals would be directed at each other and would have no value unless one of us accepted the other's views.

That, of course, is not how it works. Any rebuttal information or ideas are aimed at readers of this forum. It is up to them to decide who makes more sense. You and the other trolls here continually use that same argument to avoid having to rebut the truth and defend the lies.

IF they are truth Larry, they need no rebuttal, do they... Let me rebut across the board... They are all horse crap...

Mike

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

venturer9 wrote:

IF they are truth Larry, they need no rebuttal, do they... Let me rebut across the board... They are all horse crap...

Mike

As usual you give no rebuttal but claim that you have.

I'll have to award you this:

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

Kombiguy wrote:

Maybe, maybe not. Who knows? My SATs were a little higher, but they were taken when I was older than Bush. My LSATs were a little lower, but I was working full time when I took it. My undergraduate grades were better, but I went to a different school. My law school grades, not as good, but again, a different school and I was working full time while going to school full time. An awful lot of variables. In the long run, however, I can be pretty sure he's no dummy.

If Bush is no dummy, why did he say he saw the plane that hit the North Tower on the TV at the Florida classroom where Cheney sent him to get him out of the way on 9/11? No video of that plane was shown until the next day.

Kombiguy Loc: Cedar Rapids, IA

larrypayne wrote:

If Bush is no dummy, why did he say he saw the plane that hit the North Tower on the TV at the Florida classroom where Cheney sent him to get him out of the way on 9/11? No video of that plane was shown until the next day.

Here we are again, hijacked so that a delusional "truther" can make his claims about some huge conspiracy. I'm outta here.