When 'photographers' post processing goes too far
Jul 22, 2014 13:08:08 #
We are all getting too serious on a simple question. Lighten up, amigos.
JohnSwanda wrote:
Are you talking about people actually saying they haven't altered their photos, or just not volunteering the information? When I show people manipulated photos I don't go into what all I have done to them. I would like them to judge the photos on their own merit. If they asked I would tell them. I don't see that as deception.
Jul 22, 2014 13:16:17 #
Apaflow and JohnSwanda
I cannot win - so I may be wrong. I said "pretend" - I should have said "deny"
However the weight of opinion is on your side, so I will shut up.
I cannot win - so I may be wrong. I said "pretend" - I should have said "deny"
However the weight of opinion is on your side, so I will shut up.
Jul 22, 2014 15:28:31 #
coyotecall
Loc: New Mexico
Looks like a lot of people have a LOT of time to spend on writing comments for web sites.
Jul 22, 2014 17:56:13 #
Anyone who can take any and all photos detail perfect OOC has one **** of a lot more money in the equipment than I will ever be able to afford. So, I guess I can never take a photograph - only an altered image (altered from what came out of the camera). Some one else will have to tell me if it is a "real" photograph.
Jul 23, 2014 01:21:23 #
Jul 23, 2014 09:13:50 #
coyotecall wrote:
Looks like a lot of people have a LOT of time to spend on writing comments for web sites.
Good thing, otherwise those that enjoy reading the comments would be getting into trouble elsewhere...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.