Baby Pictures
Jan 24, 2012 23:39:25 #
Jan 24, 2012 23:50:12 #
bday7846071
Loc: Grand Junction, CO.
haze99 wrote:
A few pic's I did of my Cousin's little girl.
These are great! What a cute baby. ( there all pretty cute though)
Jan 24, 2012 23:50:51 #
Jan 24, 2012 23:52:31 #
Jan 24, 2012 23:58:07 #
MWAC wrote:
cute baby, cute ideas.
are you looking for CC?
are you looking for CC?
I'm always open for suggestions
Jan 25, 2012 00:14:14 #
Sorry I wanted to ask first.
#1- I LOVE this idea! The skin tone is off badly, the skin tone is more grey than pink, giving a zombie skin look. The background fading into the floor isn't working. I have never mastered it (one of the reasons I use seemless paper, lol) I think you need to use a gradient layer in elements or PS. (gimp might offer something close as well). I like the DoF on the guitar and the eye contact by the little one.
#2 - Great! It does look underexposed by 1/2 a stop or so. And a little more light in her eyes would been a plus but not a killer. Skin tones are much better on this one. The parents will love it.
#3 - Is underexposed by 1/2 to full stop. Have the person helping stand closer to you so the baby's attention/eye contact is more toward the camera than off to the side. Your DoF is really shallow on this resulting in the feet being OOF. I personally would have shot this the other way around, with the feet being the focal point (baby feet are soooo cute) and had the baby be soft. Or had the whole baby in focus. Skin tones are also off on this one.
I like them, baby photography is hard. None of my friends have had babies in the last year, so I haven't got to practice in a while. :(
#1- I LOVE this idea! The skin tone is off badly, the skin tone is more grey than pink, giving a zombie skin look. The background fading into the floor isn't working. I have never mastered it (one of the reasons I use seemless paper, lol) I think you need to use a gradient layer in elements or PS. (gimp might offer something close as well). I like the DoF on the guitar and the eye contact by the little one.
#2 - Great! It does look underexposed by 1/2 a stop or so. And a little more light in her eyes would been a plus but not a killer. Skin tones are much better on this one. The parents will love it.
#3 - Is underexposed by 1/2 to full stop. Have the person helping stand closer to you so the baby's attention/eye contact is more toward the camera than off to the side. Your DoF is really shallow on this resulting in the feet being OOF. I personally would have shot this the other way around, with the feet being the focal point (baby feet are soooo cute) and had the baby be soft. Or had the whole baby in focus. Skin tones are also off on this one.
I like them, baby photography is hard. None of my friends have had babies in the last year, so I haven't got to practice in a while. :(
Jan 25, 2012 00:29:27 #
I personally don't usually do baby shots. It's quiet hard to get them to do what you want them too. Yea I kept telling them to get behind me to get the baby to look my way. They eventually did and that's how I got the baby to look at me in #2. Thanks for the CC MWAC. Some good points.
Jan 25, 2012 00:35:24 #
Jan 25, 2012 06:12:19 #
Jan 25, 2012 08:19:37 #
Jan 25, 2012 08:20:14 #
Jan 26, 2012 00:34:22 #
haze99 wrote:
A few pic's I did of my Cousin's little girl.
Great job on these
Jan 26, 2012 12:14:00 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.