a couple of aviation photos (your opinions please)
Jan 24, 2012 02:09:33 #
Jan 24, 2012 02:25:36 #
Jan 24, 2012 02:30:10 #
Jan 24, 2012 02:48:55 #
preciousmetalairracing wrote:
I would like your thots.. even if not good. thx
very nice photos the 1st one has a hair or some thing at the top of it but im sure you can fix that but i like theses :) very cool shots
Jan 24, 2012 03:13:57 #
Jan 24, 2012 06:21:47 #
Jan 24, 2012 06:47:20 #
The first two pictures are ok..not quite sure that the first one is sharp; it's hard to see at this resolution.
The second one is nice except for that wicked highlight at the nose of the AC.
The only comment that I can make is that they are "standard" i.e. ho hum.
If you've ever been to an airshow you've seen and taken a million of these shots.
I'm not trying to be hard on you I'm also pointing the finger at myself...i'd rather see some fresh angles...shots that you don't normally see...
Just my opinion.
The second one is nice except for that wicked highlight at the nose of the AC.
The only comment that I can make is that they are "standard" i.e. ho hum.
If you've ever been to an airshow you've seen and taken a million of these shots.
I'm not trying to be hard on you I'm also pointing the finger at myself...i'd rather see some fresh angles...shots that you don't normally see...
Just my opinion.
Jan 24, 2012 08:33:23 #
Very nice shots. Except for that hair in the upper left corner of one.
To me, all airshow pictures are ho-hum because it is so hard to get at the same level as the planes doing a fly-by without becoming prop grease.
Sarge
To me, all airshow pictures are ho-hum because it is so hard to get at the same level as the planes doing a fly-by without becoming prop grease.
Sarge
Jan 24, 2012 08:46:28 #
sarge69 wrote:
Very nice shots. Except for that hair in the upper left corner of one.
To me, all airshow pictures are ho-hum because it is so hard to get at the same level as the planes doing a fly-by without becoming prop grease.
Sarge
To me, all airshow pictures are ho-hum because it is so hard to get at the same level as the planes doing a fly-by without becoming prop grease.
Sarge
Yeah...that's why I'd leave the fly by's and go for the static close ups.
Jan 24, 2012 09:02:06 #
Jan 24, 2012 09:23:36 #
chewy wrote:
Is that a T33 in second pic.? Other wise known as a Texas trainer.
It is a T-6 Texan.
And that P-40 is a P-47.
Jan 24, 2012 10:29:20 #
preciousmetalairracing wrote:
I would like your thots.. even if not good. thx
Number one is outstanding...except for the dust partical in the top left corner.
Jan 24, 2012 11:43:00 #
Jan 24, 2012 11:53:43 #
Jan 24, 2012 13:28:58 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.