Canon vs. Nikon the Digital Camera World article: OK. Just for giggles, sort of. Digital Camera World has published an article on Drum roll, please....... "Canon vs. Nikon"...

dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia

OK. Just for giggles, sort of.

Digital Camera World has published an article on

Drum roll, please.......

"Canon vs. Nikon"

http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2014/06/24/canon-vs-nikon-the-dslr-comparison-youve-been-waiting-for/

Now let the fun begin.... What is wrong with this article?

Marionsho Loc: Kansas

dsmeltz wrote:

OK. Just for giggles, sort of.

Digital Camera World has published an article on

Drum roll, please.......

"Canon vs. Nikon"

http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2014/06/24/canon-vs-nikon-the-dslr-comparison-youve-been-waiting-for/

Now let the fun begin.... What is wrong with this article?

I didn't think you could compare a Canon to a Nikon.

RichardSM Loc: Back in Texas

dsmeltz wrote:

OK. Just for giggles, sort of.

Digital Camera World has published an article on

Drum roll, please.......

"Canon vs. Nikon"

http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2014/06/24/canon-vs-nikon-the-dslr-comparison-youve-been-waiting-for/

Now let the fun begin.... What is wrong with this article?

I whole heartily agree with you, and yes both make great camera systems in fact I prefer Canon to the German stuff. I did have a Voutghlander film camera sold it used the money to buy my first Canon rangefinder film camera.

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

Marionsho wrote:

I didn't think you could compare a Canon to a Nikon.

Marion, of course you can compare the two!!
But unless you are comparing and using a totally biased and in-denial criteria, you will come the same conclusion every time, no matter what you shoot with.

CANON IS NUMERO UNO!!!!!

And the rest are also running.

Nor will it won't change anytime soon!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

SS

onyxtiger Loc: Northern California

SharpShooter wrote:

Marion, of course you can compare the two!!
But unless you are comparing and using a totally biased and in-denial criteria, you will come the same conclusion every time, no matter what you shoot with.

CANON IS NUMERO UNO!!!!!

And the rest are also running.

Nor will it won't change anytime soon!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

SS

That's the trouble with NorCal wannabes.....you're all deluded. First you think you're part of Northern California, then you think that Canon is the best. Too bad, so sad. :lol:
Canon is okay, but it's not the best......by far. 8-)

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

onyxtiger wrote:

That's the trouble with NorCal wannabes.....you're all deluded. First you think you're part of Northern California, then you think that Canon is the best. Too bad, so sad. :lol:
Canon is okay, but it's not the best......by far. 8-)

Like I said, I just can't get that mold to grow inside my head!! :lol:
SS

G Brown Loc: Sunny Bognor Regis West Sussex UK

Pity it didn't look at Sony amongst that inovation and market leading see-saw.....!

mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey

SharpShooter wrote:

Marion, of course you can compare the two!!
But unless you are comparing and using a totally biased and in-denial criteria, you will come the same conclusion every time, no matter what you shoot with.

CANON IS NUMERO UNO!!!!!

And the rest are also running.

Nor will it won't change anytime soon!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

SS

You are a trouble maker :)

Marionsho Loc: Kansas

onyxtiger wrote:

That's the trouble with NorCal wannabes.....you're all deluded. First you think you're part of Northern California, then you think that Canon is the best. Too bad, so sad. :lol:
Canon is okay, but it's not the best......by far. 8-)

Well put T.M. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida

G Brown wrote:

Pity it didn't look at Sony amongst that innovation and market leading see-saw.....!

You miss the point G Brown, the discussion is who is better between the lesser of two of three sisters. As soon as you introduce Sony then the discussion is who is best and then how much better the best is than Canon and Nikon.

Years ago there was a book about GM, "The Failure of Success." GM had the car market sewed up and ignored those stupid little imports, arrogance destroyed them. They made more of the same and did not innovate nor pay attention to quality. BOC, Buick, Olds, Cadillac, turned into "Big Ol' Cars."

Sony had a ready made client base. Yep people like me who had a box of Minolta glass from 85 on.

dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia

mwsilvers wrote:

You are a trouble maker :)

Of course he is!!

That's why they keep him around :lol:

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

SharpShooter wrote:

Marion, of course you can compare the two!!
But unless you are comparing and using a totally biased and in-denial criteria, you will come the same conclusion every time, no matter what you shoot with.

CANON IS NUMERO UNO!!!!!

And the rest are also running.

Nor will it won't change anytime soon!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

SS

ROFL. Ha Ha, that was a good one.

Dennis

BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA

dsmeltz wrote:

OK. Just for giggles, sort of.

Digital Camera World has published an article on

Drum roll, please.......

"Canon vs. Nikon"

http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2014/06/24/canon-vs-nikon-the-dslr-comparison-youve-been-waiting-for/

Now let the fun begin.... What is wrong with this article?

In short, a waste of electrons to write and time to read. If a camera system performs for the individual, who cares what the others offer?

Marionsho Loc: Kansas

BobHartung wrote:

In short, a waste of electrons to write and time to read. If a camera system performs for the individual, who cares what the others offer?

"In short, a waste of electrons to write and time to read."
That's why I find it hard to understand how someone can compare Canons to Nikons. :shock:

dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida

BobHartung wrote:

In short, a waste of electrons

Those electrons were grounded like misbehaving kids.