Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What special purpose lens do you use, and why?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jun 19, 2014 19:08:55   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
hochspeyer wrote:
Currently, a macro. Back in my film days, Pan-X with a 250mm Minolta catadiaoptric lens. Which was interesting, as the film was ASA-32, and the lens was a fixed f5.6 (I also shot Kodachrome ASA-64 with the same lens). I must've looked truly weird walking about with a tabletop tripod attached to the camera around my neck.


I used to do something similar with a 500/5.6 Kilfitt catadioptric. Sure was a pain carrying that table! :lol:

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 19:20:30   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
RWR wrote:
A wide-range zoom is practical as a general walk-around lens, but what do you use for those special situations? For example, I carry a macro lens in my tackle box - close-focusing ‘cause I can&#8242;t catch big fish, floating elements ‘cause I can&#8242;t swim.


RWR, I used to have the same exact problem you have and too wanted the biggest macro I could find.
Then, I found out from a couple of little girls taking selfies, that if you hold even the tiniest shaker, WAY out in front you, it would look like a monster keeper.
So I longer needed a macro.
But it won't float!! :lol:
SS

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 20:30:38   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
RWR wrote:
A wide-range zoom is practical as a general walk-around lens, but what do you use for those special situations? For example, I carry a macro lens in my tackle box - close-focusing ‘cause I can&#8242;t catch big fish, floating elements ‘cause I can&#8242;t swim.


Macro - because it makes little things big.
500mm - because it makes far things closer.
F/1.4 because it makes dark things brighter.

Reply
 
 
Jun 19, 2014 20:47:39   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
SharpShooter wrote:
RWR, I used to have the same exact problem you have and too wanted the biggest macro I could find.
Then, I found out from a couple of little girls taking selfies, that if you hold even the tiniest shaker, WAY out in front you, it would look like a monster keeper.
So I longer needed a macro.
But it won't float!! :lol:
SS


Ha Ha! I'd have to do some tall thinking to top that one, SS :lol:

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 20:48:40   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
lighthouse wrote:
Macro - because it makes little things big.
500mm - because it makes far things closer.
F/1.4 because it makes dark things brighter.


Light, you've sure got all bases covered! :lol:

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 21:00:24   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
RWR wrote:
Ha Ha! I'd have to do some tall thinking to top that one, SS :lol:


RWR, if your talking fish, I mean talking about fish, not fish that talk, it's ALL about TALL!
As for lenses I'm gonna go with, " the lens I have with me"!
RWR, now, how's THAT for a wimpy cop-out!! :lol:
SS

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 21:19:43   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
SharpShooter wrote:
RWR, if your talking fish, I mean talking about fish, not fish that talk, it's ALL about TALL!
As for lenses I'm gonna go with, " the lens I have with me"!
RWR, now, how's THAT for a wimpy cop-out!! :lol:
SS


Well, you haven't said the C word, and I'm not about to say the N word, so looks like we're BOTH wimpy cop-outs! :lol: And on that note I must sign out for tonight. :)

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2014 05:51:25   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
I also love infrared.
jerryc41 wrote:
I like the fisheye and macro. I also like shooting with my IR body. It's nice getting away from standard images.

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 06:06:28   #
Budnjax Loc: NE Florida
 
I like my Canon 8-15mm fish eye zoom.....gives a neat perspective to lots of images....can also be corrected to work as a rectilinear len.....

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 06:10:01   #
Richard K Loc: Toronto Canada
 
DavidPine wrote:
Mine are special because I love them. I had mine professionally focus calibrated yesterday which I highly recommend. My 105G (0), 24-70 (0) and my 70-200 (-4). My 70-200 seems to be my favorite.


Was it expensive if you don't mind me asking $

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 06:43:22   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
RWR wrote:
Light, you've sure got all bases covered! :lol:

I should have fully expanded.
As well as
Macro - because it makes little things big.
500mm - because it makes far things closer.
F/1.4 because it makes dark things brighter.
there is
24mm tilt/shift for architecture, trees, low light foreground to background focus, tinytown etc,
14mm for foreground impact & galaxies
& 135mm Soft Focus for bokeh

I love specialty lenses, semi exotics and primes.
Other people can have the "Holy Trinity".

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2014 06:50:03   #
OutdoorNH Loc: Atlanta, GA
 
I don't have one yet, but shots I've seen from a tilt-shift lens are interesting to me.

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 07:00:28   #
markgoldberg Loc: Annapolis, MD
 
Three Nikkor lenses I consider special purpose:(1) 10.5mm DX Fisheye, 85mm f1.4G for portraits, and 60mm f2.8 Micro.

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 07:17:17   #
Erv Loc: Medina Ohio
 
That was bad, very bad!:):) You should be carrying a fisheye lens for that!!! :):)
Erv


RWR wrote:
A wide-range zoom is practical as a general walk-around lens, but what do you use for those special situations? For example, I carry a macro lens in my tackle box - close-focusing ‘cause I can&#8242;t catch big fish, floating elements ‘cause I can&#8242;t swim.

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 07:18:16   #
Preachdude Loc: Geneva, OH
 
RWR wrote:
A wide-range zoom is practical as a general walk-around lens, but what do you use for those special situations? For example, I carry a macro lens in my tackle box - close-focusing ‘cause I can&#8242;t catch big fish, floating elements ‘cause I can&#8242;t swim.


The most useful for me has been a macro lens -- which I have used for portraits as well as for close-up pictures. I've never been satisfied with the results I've gotten with fisheye lenses. One further type is worth mentioning -- the tilt/shift lens. I do landscape photography more than anything else, and in places like Yosemite and the Grand Canyon, a shift lens can be very useful. It takes practice and skill to use one effectively. Since good ones are so expensive, I would recommend you try renting one for experimentation from an outfit like lensrentals.com. While it is true we can do perspective correction in Photoshop, I find that too much is lost in the re-sampling process to give me results I really like. The Canon 17mm f/4 is truly fine. The Nikon 45mm f/2.8 is also fine. Schneider's 50mm f/2.8 is the expensive option for Sony users, but Samyang/Bower/Rokinon makes less expensive tilt/shift lenses in a variety of mounts. Keep in mind that in all cases, aperture and focusing are manual

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.