hochspeyer wrote:
Currently, a macro. Back in my film days, Pan-X with a 250mm Minolta catadiaoptric lens. Which was interesting, as the film was ASA-32, and the lens was a fixed f5.6 (I also shot Kodachrome ASA-64 with the same lens). I must've looked truly weird walking about with a tabletop tripod attached to the camera around my neck.
I used to do something similar with a 500/5.6 Kilfitt catadioptric. Sure was a pain carrying that table! :lol:
RWR wrote:
A wide-range zoom is practical as a general walk-around lens, but what do you use for those special situations? For example, I carry a macro lens in my tackle box - close-focusing cause I can′t catch big fish, floating elements cause I can′t swim.
RWR, I used to have the same exact problem you have and too wanted the biggest macro I could find.
Then, I found out from a couple of little girls taking selfies, that if you hold even the tiniest shaker, WAY out in front you, it would look like a monster keeper.
So I longer needed a macro.
But it won't float!! :lol:
SS
RWR wrote:
A wide-range zoom is practical as a general walk-around lens, but what do you use for those special situations? For example, I carry a macro lens in my tackle box - close-focusing cause I can′t catch big fish, floating elements cause I can′t swim.
Macro - because it makes little things big.
500mm - because it makes far things closer.
F/1.4 because it makes dark things brighter.
SharpShooter wrote:
RWR, I used to have the same exact problem you have and too wanted the biggest macro I could find.
Then, I found out from a couple of little girls taking selfies, that if you hold even the tiniest shaker, WAY out in front you, it would look like a monster keeper.
So I longer needed a macro.
But it won't float!! :lol:
SS
Ha Ha! I'd have to do some tall thinking to top that one, SS :lol:
lighthouse wrote:
Macro - because it makes little things big.
500mm - because it makes far things closer.
F/1.4 because it makes dark things brighter.
Light, you've sure got all bases covered! :lol:
RWR wrote:
Ha Ha! I'd have to do some tall thinking to top that one, SS :lol:
RWR, if your talking fish, I mean talking about fish, not fish that talk, it's ALL about TALL!
As for lenses I'm gonna go with, " the lens I have with me"!
RWR, now, how's THAT for a wimpy cop-out!! :lol:
SS
SharpShooter wrote:
RWR, if your talking fish, I mean talking about fish, not fish that talk, it's ALL about TALL!
As for lenses I'm gonna go with, " the lens I have with me"!
RWR, now, how's THAT for a wimpy cop-out!! :lol:
SS
Well, you haven't said the C word, and I'm not about to say the N word, so looks like we're BOTH wimpy cop-outs! :lol: And on that note I must sign out for tonight. :)
I like my Canon 8-15mm fish eye zoom.....gives a neat perspective to lots of images....can also be corrected to work as a rectilinear len.....
DavidPine wrote:
Mine are special because I love them. I had mine professionally focus calibrated yesterday which I highly recommend. My 105G (0), 24-70 (0) and my 70-200 (-4). My 70-200 seems to be my favorite.
Was it expensive if you don't mind me asking $
RWR wrote:
Light, you've sure got all bases covered! :lol:
I should have fully expanded.
As well as
Macro - because it makes little things big.
500mm - because it makes far things closer.
F/1.4 because it makes dark things brighter.
there is
24mm tilt/shift for architecture, trees, low light foreground to background focus, tinytown etc,
14mm for foreground impact & galaxies
& 135mm Soft Focus for bokeh
I love specialty lenses, semi exotics and primes.
Other people can have the "Holy Trinity".
I don't have one yet, but shots I've seen from a tilt-shift lens are interesting to me.
Three Nikkor lenses I consider special purpose:(1) 10.5mm DX Fisheye, 85mm f1.4G for portraits, and 60mm f2.8 Micro.
Erv
Loc: Medina Ohio
That was bad, very bad!:):) You should be carrying a fisheye lens for that!!! :):)
Erv
RWR wrote:
A wide-range zoom is practical as a general walk-around lens, but what do you use for those special situations? For example, I carry a macro lens in my tackle box - close-focusing cause I can′t catch big fish, floating elements cause I can′t swim.
RWR wrote:
A wide-range zoom is practical as a general walk-around lens, but what do you use for those special situations? For example, I carry a macro lens in my tackle box - close-focusing cause I can′t catch big fish, floating elements cause I can′t swim.
The most useful for me has been a macro lens -- which I have used for portraits as well as for close-up pictures. I've never been satisfied with the results I've gotten with fisheye lenses. One further type is worth mentioning -- the tilt/shift lens. I do landscape photography more than anything else, and in places like Yosemite and the Grand Canyon, a shift lens can be very useful. It takes practice and skill to use one effectively. Since good ones are so expensive, I would recommend you try renting one for experimentation from an outfit like lensrentals.com. While it is true we can do perspective correction in Photoshop, I find that too much is lost in the re-sampling process to give me results I really like. The Canon 17mm f/4 is truly fine. The Nikon 45mm f/2.8 is also fine. Schneider's 50mm f/2.8 is the expensive option for Sony users, but Samyang/Bower/Rokinon makes less expensive tilt/shift lenses in a variety of mounts. Keep in mind that in all cases, aperture and focusing are manual
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.