House Majority Leader Cantor Loses to Tea Party Opponent
Jun 16, 2014 10:36:27 #
Jun 16, 2014 10:39:08 #
Penny MG wrote:
Oh Larry, I know you've been on the site long enough to know that gunslinger can speak quite well for himself. Though we don't agree on everything, He is not lacking in education and the ability to bring forth a good conversation.
Mouseketeer chooses not to debate when he knows he would be defending lies. His emoticon ploy signifies he fears debating against truth.
Jun 16, 2014 10:39:43 #
Croce
Loc: Earth
larrypayne wrote:
The videos of the planes hitting the towers clearl... (show quote)
With all due respect Larry, the fact that one set of circumstances did not happen is hardly conclusive proof that a specific other set of circumstances did. You are of the opinion that the buildings were blown up by detonating strategically placed explosives prior to the plane crashes. To substantiate that you need to state who, how, when, why etc. You have not.
Jun 16, 2014 11:08:02 #
Croce wrote:
With all due respect Larry, the fact that one set of circumstances did not happen is hardly conclusive proof that a specific other set of circumstances did. You are of the opinion that the buildings were blown up by detonating strategically placed explosives prior to the plane crashes. To substantiate that you need to state who, how, when, why etc. You have not.
If you have only the knowledge of physics that common sense provides and you watch the videos of the three towers going down, you have to know that they were controlled demolitions.
It is not up to me to provide the who, how, when and why.
That should have been the job of the 9/11 Commission but they were instructed not to investigate in those areas.
So there has not been a legitimate investigation of 9/11. The 9/11 Commission report did not even mention the fall of WTC7. The 9/11 Commission Report did not mention that NORAD lied to Congress as Senator Mark Dayton points out here: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2enul_senator-mark-dayton-on-911-commissi_news
Jun 16, 2014 14:29:55 #
Evidence that George W. Bush had advanced knowledge of 9-11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw
Jun 16, 2014 14:54:03 #
dirtpusher wrote:
Evidence that George W. Bush had advanced knowledge of 9-11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw
That's an interesting segment at the beginning. The French filmmakers were working for the NYC Fire Department. They were conveniently located at just the right place to get an unobstructed view of the plane hitting the North Tower. The plane was said to be traveling at 500 mph. Being a photographer I know how difficult it is to get a shot of a fast moving object even when you know it is going to happen. The Gaudet brother had to swing his camera around quickly to frame the North Tower so well. How did he know where the plane was going to hit? It happened so quickly. I think they were there to get that shot specifically. They were alerted to where the plane would hit and were ready to swing the camera to that spot. That's the only way it could have been done. The perpetrators needed that film to enhance their fear campaign.
When Zionist terrorists blew up the King David Hotel in 1946, they had a photographer ready to film the explosion. History repeats.
King David Hotel--91 dead
Jun 16, 2014 17:43:20 #
larrypayne wrote:
That's an interesting segment at the beginning. Th... (show quote)
The helos will be headed your way, Larry. You'll love Ft. Stanton. Maybe a French film crew will just happen by and take your picture with your straight jacket on. Smile!
Jun 16, 2014 17:44:26 #
dirtpusher wrote:
Evidence that George W. Bush had advanced knowledge of 9-11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw
Gee Dirt, I didn't know you were a loyal follower of LarryP and Whole2thr.
Jun 16, 2014 18:00:43 #
amadjuster wrote:
The helos will be headed your way, Larry. You'll love Ft. Stanton. Maybe a French film crew will just happen by and take your picture with your straight jacket on. Smile!
Can't argue with sound logic, can you, Amadinejad?
Jun 16, 2014 18:02:28 #
amadjuster wrote:
Gee Dirt, I didn't know you were a loyal follower of LarryP and Whole2thr.
Maybe DP's just indicating he's not on the gov payroll as you appear to be.
Jun 16, 2014 18:36:16 #
larrypayne wrote:
Can't argue with sound logic, can you, Amadinejad?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Jun 16, 2014 18:36:44 #
larrypayne wrote:
Maybe DP's just indicating he's not on the gov payroll as you appear to be.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Jun 16, 2014 18:44:38 #
amadjuster wrote:
Gee Dirt, I didn't know you were a loyal follower of LarryP and Whole2thr.
what ever you may wanna think sounds pretty good to me. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jun 16, 2014 18:52:44 #
amadjuster wrote:
You use the term obvious as if this was a proven fact. It was obvious, in your opinion. Your link on Gen. Stubblebine doesn't work. Also, there were eyewitnesses who saw the plane and Stubblebine didn't.
You will never be satisfied.
You will never be satisfied.
I have wondered why there are no photos of the plane that hit the pentagon.
The only video shows a object that does not look like a plane to me.
Eyewitnesses to a event like that are very unreliable. Some people will say they saw something just to get the attention.
Jun 16, 2014 19:13:34 #
amadjuster wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Is that you, Mouseketeer.
I should have known you and amadjuster were the same person.
No one else could be as insulting and nasty as you two.
Are you using Centcom Multiple Persona Software?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.