Not quite the same as using a converted camera but still pretty good, if I do say so myself :)
dugole
Loc: Matawan, New Jersey
A fine effect with the filter - what R number is it? It really needs to be downloaded to appreciate your picture - good shot!
72 nm. Thanks for the compliment!
preachy wrote:
72 nm. Thanks for the compliment!
Missing a Zero... 720nm IR near would be 650nm... far would be 950nm filters... 650 nm peeks into visible and 950 stop a bet short of 1000nm shown on reference.
Even without the Zero, good shots, good experimentation. Many cameras do not need conversion. My Panasonic ZS20 will take a 750nm shot quite well. I do have a Canon G2 that I converted by directions given on the internet. Quite an experience... easy to take apart.... more difficult to reassemble... more difficult to reassemble... more difficult to reassemble... aaaha.. it worked the third time. :thumbup: :lol:
see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared
720, right. I was reading the model number right from the filter (R72).
Both are very good, Rick! I like #2 best.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.