American soldier did not die "defending our freedom"
May 28, 2014 10:24:40 #
Wednesday May 28th, 2014 informationliberation.com
American Soldiers Did Not Die Defending Our Freedom (Jacob G. Hornberger)
I was at the Washington Nationals baseball game yesterday. Whenever I attend a Nats game, there is an air of militarism surrounding the game, but attending on Memorial Day helps to remind us what a truly militarized society America has become.
After all, what in the world does baseball, a quite peaceful and enjoyable pastime, have to do with America's countless foreign wars, which have killed, tortured, and maimed millions of people?
One of the most fascinating aspects to U.S. militarism is the bromide that has infected the minds of so many Americans: that U.S. soldiers have sacrificed their lives or limbs in foreign wars to "defend our freedom" here at home. Not surprisingly, it was repeated at the Nationals game yesterday. People who came to watch a baseball game were asked to remember the sacrifices, including deaths, that American servicemen have made in the "defense of our freedom."
Why do I find that fascinating?
Two reasons: first, The bromide is palpably false, and, second, it is a testament to the power of state to indoctrinate the citizenry.
This is a bromide that is inculcated into every child, from the time he reaches six years of age and heads into the public (i.e., government) school system. By the time the kid reaches his teen years, the indoctrination is taking hold. By the time he becomes an adult, the indoctrination is complete. In fact, the indoctrination is so perfect that actually it doesn't matter what the troops are doing overseas. Whatever they are doing is automatically considered to be "defending our freedom."
Consider a hypothetical. Suppose there is some country thousands of miles away that is minding its own business. There are no attacks on the United States or even threats to attack the United States. The only problem is that the regime is not sufficiently submissive to the U.S. government.
The U.S. government decides to invade the country and install a pro-U.S. regime. The troops are sent into battle. Some are killed. Countless more people are killed on the other side.
There is no doubt that millions of Americans will automatically conclude that those U.S. troops killed and died "defending our freedom," notwithstanding the fact that our freedom was never at risk. Remember: that hypothetical country never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. Yet, many Americans will nonetheless honor their brave and courageous soldiers who died or lost arms or legs while "defending our freedom." It is how the indoctrinated mind works.
How can I be so certain that that's the way many Americans would react to that hypothetical situation?
Because that's what happened with Iraq, a country whose government never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. Thus, not one single U.S. soldier died in Iraq "defending our freedom" because our freedom was never threatened by Iraq.
The same holds true for the 58,000 plus American soldiers who died in the Vietnam War. North Vietnam was engaged in a civil war against South Vietnam. At no time did North Vietnam attack or invade the United States. It had no interest in doing so and, anyway, it lacked the military capability to do so. The U.S. government invaded Vietnam and embroiled itself in its civil war. At no time were the freedoms of the American people threatened by the North Vietnamese. The American troops who were sent to the deaths in Vietnam did not die in the defense of our freedom here at home.
The same is true for the tens of thousands of American men who were sent to their deaths in the Korean War. North Korea never attacked or invaded the United States or even threatened to do so. American freedom here at home was never threatened. Thus, those U.S. soldiers in Korea did not die defending our freedom.
What about the soldiers who died in the U.S. invasion of Panama or Grenada? Again, Panama and Granada never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. Those troops did not die in the defense of our freedom.
World War I? At no time did Germany or Austria-Hungary attack the United States or even threaten to do so. The Great War was a war between empires, one that never endangered the freedom of the American people. The U.S. government simply chose to intervene in that conflict in the hopes of "making the world safe for democracy" and to "end all wars." Those U.S. soldiers who died in World War I did not die defending our freedom.
What about the so-called "good war"--World War II. While Japan attacked U.S. forces at Pearl Harbor and the Philippines, the attack was a direct consequence of President Roosevelt's repeated attempts to induce Japan to attack the United States to fulfill his wish to get the United States into the war. FDR had imposed an oil embargo on Japan, frozen Japanese bank accounts in the United States, and imposed humiliating terms in pre-war negotiations with Japan, all with the aim of getting Japan to "fire the first shot" so that the United States could get into the war. Japan never had the aim or the military means of invading and occupying the United States and depriving the American people of their freedom.
What about Nazi Germany? It desired to avoid war with the United States, which is why FDR used Japan as a "back door" to war. The only reason Germany declared war on the United States after Pearl Harbor was to fulfill its treaty obligations to Japan. Before England declared war on Germany, it was clear that Hitler was moving east toward the Soviet Union, not west toward the United States. Moreover, since Germany lacked the military means to cross the English Channel and invade England, how in the world would it cross the Atlantic Ocean and invade the United States?
Moreover, consider the aftermath of World War II: East Germany and Eastern Europe and China all under communist control. Isn't that what American soldiers actually died for--so that the communists, rather than the Nazis or Japanese, could control those parts of the world? Even if one finds that a worthy thing to die for, it's a far cry from dying in the defense of our freedom here at home.
Oh, I almost forgot Afghanistan. No, al-Qaeda was never going to invade and occupy the United States and take away our freedom. Neither was the Taliban. The 9/11 attacks were retaliation for actions taken by the U.S. government in the Middle East prior to 9/11. The Taliban government never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so.
The truth, as discomforting as it is, is that the many U.S soldiers who have been sacrificed in America's countless foreign wars did not die defending our freedom. That's nothing more than a false bromide used to justify America's never-ending foreign wars.
When enough people break through the indoctrination, as libertarians have, the bromide will no longer have the power it does over people's minds. At that point, maybe Americans will be free to enjoy baseball games and other sporting events without all the militarism attached to them.
_
Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve years in Texas. He also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to become director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education. He has advanced freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all across the country as well as on Fox News' Neil Cavuto and Greta van Susteren shows and he appeared as a regular commentator on Judge Andrew Napolitano's show Freedom Watch. View these interviews at LewRockwell.com and from Full Context. Send him email.
American Soldiers Did Not Die Defending Our Freedom (Jacob G. Hornberger)
I was at the Washington Nationals baseball game yesterday. Whenever I attend a Nats game, there is an air of militarism surrounding the game, but attending on Memorial Day helps to remind us what a truly militarized society America has become.
After all, what in the world does baseball, a quite peaceful and enjoyable pastime, have to do with America's countless foreign wars, which have killed, tortured, and maimed millions of people?
One of the most fascinating aspects to U.S. militarism is the bromide that has infected the minds of so many Americans: that U.S. soldiers have sacrificed their lives or limbs in foreign wars to "defend our freedom" here at home. Not surprisingly, it was repeated at the Nationals game yesterday. People who came to watch a baseball game were asked to remember the sacrifices, including deaths, that American servicemen have made in the "defense of our freedom."
Why do I find that fascinating?
Two reasons: first, The bromide is palpably false, and, second, it is a testament to the power of state to indoctrinate the citizenry.
This is a bromide that is inculcated into every child, from the time he reaches six years of age and heads into the public (i.e., government) school system. By the time the kid reaches his teen years, the indoctrination is taking hold. By the time he becomes an adult, the indoctrination is complete. In fact, the indoctrination is so perfect that actually it doesn't matter what the troops are doing overseas. Whatever they are doing is automatically considered to be "defending our freedom."
Consider a hypothetical. Suppose there is some country thousands of miles away that is minding its own business. There are no attacks on the United States or even threats to attack the United States. The only problem is that the regime is not sufficiently submissive to the U.S. government.
The U.S. government decides to invade the country and install a pro-U.S. regime. The troops are sent into battle. Some are killed. Countless more people are killed on the other side.
There is no doubt that millions of Americans will automatically conclude that those U.S. troops killed and died "defending our freedom," notwithstanding the fact that our freedom was never at risk. Remember: that hypothetical country never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. Yet, many Americans will nonetheless honor their brave and courageous soldiers who died or lost arms or legs while "defending our freedom." It is how the indoctrinated mind works.
How can I be so certain that that's the way many Americans would react to that hypothetical situation?
Because that's what happened with Iraq, a country whose government never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. Thus, not one single U.S. soldier died in Iraq "defending our freedom" because our freedom was never threatened by Iraq.
The same holds true for the 58,000 plus American soldiers who died in the Vietnam War. North Vietnam was engaged in a civil war against South Vietnam. At no time did North Vietnam attack or invade the United States. It had no interest in doing so and, anyway, it lacked the military capability to do so. The U.S. government invaded Vietnam and embroiled itself in its civil war. At no time were the freedoms of the American people threatened by the North Vietnamese. The American troops who were sent to the deaths in Vietnam did not die in the defense of our freedom here at home.
The same is true for the tens of thousands of American men who were sent to their deaths in the Korean War. North Korea never attacked or invaded the United States or even threatened to do so. American freedom here at home was never threatened. Thus, those U.S. soldiers in Korea did not die defending our freedom.
What about the soldiers who died in the U.S. invasion of Panama or Grenada? Again, Panama and Granada never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. Those troops did not die in the defense of our freedom.
World War I? At no time did Germany or Austria-Hungary attack the United States or even threaten to do so. The Great War was a war between empires, one that never endangered the freedom of the American people. The U.S. government simply chose to intervene in that conflict in the hopes of "making the world safe for democracy" and to "end all wars." Those U.S. soldiers who died in World War I did not die defending our freedom.
What about the so-called "good war"--World War II. While Japan attacked U.S. forces at Pearl Harbor and the Philippines, the attack was a direct consequence of President Roosevelt's repeated attempts to induce Japan to attack the United States to fulfill his wish to get the United States into the war. FDR had imposed an oil embargo on Japan, frozen Japanese bank accounts in the United States, and imposed humiliating terms in pre-war negotiations with Japan, all with the aim of getting Japan to "fire the first shot" so that the United States could get into the war. Japan never had the aim or the military means of invading and occupying the United States and depriving the American people of their freedom.
What about Nazi Germany? It desired to avoid war with the United States, which is why FDR used Japan as a "back door" to war. The only reason Germany declared war on the United States after Pearl Harbor was to fulfill its treaty obligations to Japan. Before England declared war on Germany, it was clear that Hitler was moving east toward the Soviet Union, not west toward the United States. Moreover, since Germany lacked the military means to cross the English Channel and invade England, how in the world would it cross the Atlantic Ocean and invade the United States?
Moreover, consider the aftermath of World War II: East Germany and Eastern Europe and China all under communist control. Isn't that what American soldiers actually died for--so that the communists, rather than the Nazis or Japanese, could control those parts of the world? Even if one finds that a worthy thing to die for, it's a far cry from dying in the defense of our freedom here at home.
Oh, I almost forgot Afghanistan. No, al-Qaeda was never going to invade and occupy the United States and take away our freedom. Neither was the Taliban. The 9/11 attacks were retaliation for actions taken by the U.S. government in the Middle East prior to 9/11. The Taliban government never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so.
The truth, as discomforting as it is, is that the many U.S soldiers who have been sacrificed in America's countless foreign wars did not die defending our freedom. That's nothing more than a false bromide used to justify America's never-ending foreign wars.
When enough people break through the indoctrination, as libertarians have, the bromide will no longer have the power it does over people's minds. At that point, maybe Americans will be free to enjoy baseball games and other sporting events without all the militarism attached to them.
_
Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve years in Texas. He also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to become director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education. He has advanced freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all across the country as well as on Fox News' Neil Cavuto and Greta van Susteren shows and he appeared as a regular commentator on Judge Andrew Napolitano's show Freedom Watch. View these interviews at LewRockwell.com and from Full Context. Send him email.
May 28, 2014 10:31:22 #
May 28, 2014 10:54:04 #
May 28, 2014 11:16:48 #
RichieC
Loc: Adirondacks
Jacob G. Hornberger exists because of many thousands who gave their all and yet he has contributed nothing but contempt for them and us with this narrow minded diatribe.
But then what do you expect from a blood sucking narcissistic lawyer. I can counter every single point he has made.
But then what do you expect from a blood sucking narcissistic lawyer. I can counter every single point he has made.
May 28, 2014 12:01:19 #
Maybe it's not aggression against us but aggression against those with similar interests and requests for assistance from us.
Oh no, it seems wrong then because we promised support to Viet Nam after removal of our supporting troops and look what happened to them.
Sarge69
Oh no, it seems wrong then because we promised support to Viet Nam after removal of our supporting troops and look what happened to them.
Sarge69
May 28, 2014 12:43:00 #
Good topic, budnjax
I've always known our wars were not to benefit the American people. Many millionaires and now billionaires have built their fortunes from war profiteering. The Bush family on both sides of the family have been war profiteers going back a century.
Procuring Palestine for the Zionists has been the greatest cause of war in the last century. Benjamin Freedman explains how that happened here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8OmxI2AYV8
I've always known our wars were not to benefit the American people. Many millionaires and now billionaires have built their fortunes from war profiteering. The Bush family on both sides of the family have been war profiteers going back a century.
Procuring Palestine for the Zionists has been the greatest cause of war in the last century. Benjamin Freedman explains how that happened here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8OmxI2AYV8
May 28, 2014 13:05:06 #
May 28, 2014 14:03:47 #
dljen wrote:
I hate war of any kind but think this post reeks.
What is the reeking part, Donna?
May 28, 2014 14:24:24 #
RichieC wrote:
Jacob G. Hornberger exists because of many thousands who gave their all and yet he has contributed nothing but contempt for them and us with this narrow minded diatribe.
But then what do you expect from a blood sucking narcissistic lawyer. I can counter every single point he has made.
But then what do you expect from a blood sucking narcissistic lawyer. I can counter every single point he has made.
So go ahead and do it.
May 28, 2014 14:25:34 #
LP must be handing out cards to his buddies with this forums web address on it.
May 28, 2014 14:35:50 #
larrypayne wrote:
What is the reeking part, Donna?
I think our country used to [I'll paraphrase] "see crimes and tried to right them," and realized that we can't be the moral guide of the world. So, when our government didn't agree with another (ex. Communism), we would try to stop the spread of it.
Now, hopefully, we accept even though we do not understand.
Iraq was the only one I see that was totally uncalled for and I don't blame the soldiers, they, of course, did only what they were told. It goes back to oil, money and Cheney.
May 28, 2014 14:41:37 #
I was waiting for the OP to include some Zionist crap. Thank you Larry Payne for completing the circle of bullshit.
May 28, 2014 15:30:39 #
SteveR wrote:
LP must be handing out cards to his buddies with this forums web address on it.
Why are so many Christians war lovers?
May 28, 2014 15:33:12 #
dljen wrote:
I think our country used to I'll paraphrase &quo... (show quote)
I think you mean well, Donna, but you know little of what war is all about.
Read this and you'll understand a bit better. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.html
May 28, 2014 15:35:16 #
RichieC wrote:
Jacob G. Hornberger exists because of many thousands who gave their all and yet he has contributed nothing but contempt for them and us with this narrow minded diatribe.
But then what do you expect from a blood sucking narcissistic lawyer. I can counter every single point he has made.
But then what do you expect from a blood sucking narcissistic lawyer. I can counter every single point he has made.
I'd be interested to see you counter every point he made.
I'm betting I could counter every counter you make.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.