Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
More from 5-21
May 22, 2014 08:26:52 #
Another small (4mm total width) translucent spider (on the hood of my car of course) & a Blue Eyed Grass flower (Sisyrinchium angustifolium) that was about 8mm tip to tip...
May 22, 2014 08:40:47 #
May 22, 2014 10:06:12 #
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
May 22, 2014 12:58:24 #
May 22, 2014 13:07:07 #
May 22, 2014 13:28:11 #
Went to the gym & saw a couple of other spiders on it but no camera then.
May 22, 2014 13:33:46 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Went to the gym & saw a couple of other spiders on it but no camera then.
i cant believe you go places without a camera :shock:
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
May 22, 2014 13:44:03 #
Gets too hot to leave it in the car... That said, I do keep a Canon point & shoot in the car & my old Nikon D70s but the Nikon just has an old crappy Sigma 70-300 on it... No macro to speak of...Getting ready to post a Toad & some more bugs from today.
tinusbum wrote:
i cant believe you go places without a camera :shock:
May 22, 2014 13:48:35 #
May 22, 2014 20:21:50 #
Is blue grass a stack or layer merge in post? DOF is better than I'd expect.
May 22, 2014 20:53:56 #
Blue-Eyed Grass Exif info means single capture:
Camera Model: NIKON D300
Image Date: 2014-05-21
Focal Length: 105mm
Aperture: f/22.0
Exposure Time: 0.0050 s (1/200-sec)
ISO equiv: 200
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Spot
Exposure: Manual
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No
Camera Model: NIKON D300
Image Date: 2014-05-21
Focal Length: 105mm
Aperture: f/22.0
Exposure Time: 0.0050 s (1/200-sec)
ISO equiv: 200
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Spot
Exposure: Manual
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
May 22, 2014 21:01:50 #
Yep, no stack... I have yet to try that...
May 22, 2014 21:09:34 #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Blue-Eyed Grass Exif info means single capture:
I do believe if you merge layers in Photoshop EXIF is retained from background (primary image). Also one can edit/add EXIF in Lightroom or Photoshop with a plugin... Handy for adding metadata lost in the post processing workflow or correcting incorrect date/times stamps.
May 22, 2014 21:17:51 #
A-PeeR wrote:
Try a stack in PhotoShop and post.I do believe if you merge layers in Photoshop EXIF is retained from background (primary image). Also one can edit/add EXIF in Lightroom or Photoshop with a plugin... Handy for adding metadata lost in the post processing workflow or correcting incorrect date/times stamps.
May 22, 2014 21:48:24 #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Not sure how to stack in photoshop (use Zerene) but merging and blending images retains EXIF of first photo:Try a stack in PhotoShop and post.
Open image 1 and 2 separately in photoshop.
Add layer to image 1, copy image two and paste on newly created layer in image one. Manipulate layer as you wish and save file..
1. macro of flower
2. macro of purple flower from the other side
3. merged and blended layers saved as jpeg, EXIF retained.
Example is just a quick down and dirty to show how program acts not an example of good PS skills....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.