OnOne Perfect Photo Suite v8.5
May 15, 2014 09:14:18 #
Does anyone have experience with using Perfect Photo Suite with Lightroom? Thank you for your input.
May 16, 2014 14:18:20 #
onOne Perfect Photo Suite is a great companion to Lightroom. A excellent editing program that can be used as a Lightroom plug-in. It adds many editing functions Lightroom lacks.
Especially nice for RAW (and jpeg, too) to convert in Lightroom and fine tune in onOne. Actually easier, faster and more intuitive than the big Photoshop.
Especially nice for RAW (and jpeg, too) to convert in Lightroom and fine tune in onOne. Actually easier, faster and more intuitive than the big Photoshop.
May 16, 2014 16:31:07 #
Thanks for the input; how well does the "erase" feature work? Does it leave any odd artifacts after removal of the object?
May 16, 2014 18:56:37 #
jtang2 wrote:
Thanks for the input; how well does the "erase" feature work? Does it leave any odd artifacts after removal of the object?
About the same as PS patch / content aware fill I would say. But I have to admit I almost never use it. I do my removal if needed in PS
May 17, 2014 16:43:54 #
jtang2 wrote:
Thanks for the input; how well does the "erase" feature work? Does it leave any odd artifacts after removal of the object?
Works really well for me. I got the program for the layers, erase, clone and such.
I haven't updated to 8.5 yet which has improvements to 'erase'
Try a trial version. Check out their tutorials.
May 17, 2014 16:48:50 #
DavidPine
Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
I have the suite. There are a lot of video tutorials available on YouTube and the On One web site. PS CC is still the king of post processing.
jtang2 wrote:
Does anyone have experience with using Perfect Photo Suite with Lightroom? Thank you for your input.
May 18, 2014 07:25:59 #
jtang2 wrote:
Thanks for the input; how well does the "erase" feature work? Does it leave any odd artifacts after removal of the object?
I have Perfect Photo Suite, CC and Lightroom. I use Lightroom 100% of the time, PPS 98% of the time, and these days I use CC maybe 10% of the time. There are just some operations, like channel repair, warping and certain content aware things that are best done in CC. Otherwise the other two are extremely good. As far as the eraser, it's not perfect, but it can be used effectively. I find that masking out the areas I do not want sampled in CC, and using a selection-based content aware fill or move, is almost always a better way to go.
May 29, 2014 06:57:36 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.