Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sigma Telephoto Zoom
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jan 13, 2012 09:25:42   #
rufus1 Loc: Winter Haven, Florida
 
I need some opinions about this lens. Purchased the 170-500m, 1:5/6.3 used and have been struggling with it ever since. Most of the photos are soft or just plain out of focus whether they are shot hand held or tripod, infinity or not.
Ask local photo store about problem, cost about $400.00 to clean and recalibrate. Actually have never gotten a tack sharp image since purchase. Do not want to waste money or anymore time if it's a lost cause.

Reply
Jan 13, 2012 09:46:47   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all have repeated excellent reviews for sharpness, albeit a little slow due to the aperture rating. I have used one on a tryout and was impressed with the sharpness, but did not buy it as it did not improve the image over the 400mm F5.6 Sigma prime I was already using.
I notice you bought this particular lens used, hopefully from a dealer such as B&H, KEH or Adorama who all give you at least 30 day money-back guarantee. If you bought it from an individual I would have hoped you had tried it out before buying it.
In either case, to give any USED lens a bad review is hardly objective as you typically have no history as to the use or abuse of that lense. Buying a used lense is the same as buying a used car, you get what you got unless it comes with some sort of guarantee from a reputable dealer. I am sorry you got a bad deal but due diligence in any used purchase is a buyers best asset.
You might try setting up on a tripod and zooming on a high contrast subject and taking several shots at wide open aperture and manual focusing in very small adjustments, you may find a nice "sweet spot" in the focus range that way. This will tell you that the cameras AF is out of synch with the lense and that it WILL take good, sharp shots, but that you will definitely have to get it cleaned and adjusted for your camera. Hope you got a pood price on it.

Reply
Jan 13, 2012 09:55:44   #
rufus1 Loc: Winter Haven, Florida
 
Took it for a test drive but was urban (LCD did not show flaws), most of what I shot is landscape and wildlife. Even had my eyes checked because it was getting so bad. My 70-200mm seems fine. It isn't a major loss of cash but sure has shaken my confidence
MT Shooter wrote:
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all have repeated excellent reviews for sharpness, albeit a little slow due to the aperture rating. I have used one on a tryout and was impressed with the sharpness, but did not buy it as it did not improve the image over the 400mm F5.6 Sigma prime I was already using.
I notice you bought this particular lens used, hopefully from a dealer such as B&H, KEH or Adorama who all give you at least 30 day money-back guarantee. If you bought it from an individual I would have hoped you had tried it out before buying it.
In either case, to give any USED lens a bad review is hardly objective as you typically have no history as to the use or abuse of that lense. Buying a used lense is the same as buying a used car, you get what you got unless it comes with some sort of guarantee from a reputable dealer. I am sorry you got a bad deal but due diligence in any used purchase is a buyers best asset.
You might try setting up on a tripod and zooming on a high contrast subject and taking several shots at wide open aperture and manual focusing in very small adjustments, you may find a nice "sweet spot" in the focus range that way. This will tell you that the cameras AF is out of synch with the lense and that it WILL take good, sharp shots, but that you will definitely have to get it cleaned and adjusted for your camera. Hope you got a pood price on it.
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2012 10:01:05   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
rufus1 wrote:
Took it for a test drive but was urban (LCD did not show flaws), most of what I shot is landscape and wildlife. Even had my eyes checked because it was getting so bad. My 70-200mm seems fine. It isn't a major loss of cash but sure has shaken my confidence
MT Shooter wrote:
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all have repeated excellent reviews for sharpness, albeit a little slow due to the aperture rating. I have used one on a tryout and was impressed with the sharpness, but did not buy it as it did not improve the image over the 400mm F5.6 Sigma prime I was already using.
I notice you bought this particular lens used, hopefully from a dealer such as B&H, KEH or Adorama who all give you at least 30 day money-back guarantee. If you bought it from an individual I would have hoped you had tried it out before buying it.
In either case, to give any USED lens a bad review is hardly objective as you typically have no history as to the use or abuse of that lense. Buying a used lense is the same as buying a used car, you get what you got unless it comes with some sort of guarantee from a reputable dealer. I am sorry you got a bad deal but due diligence in any used purchase is a buyers best asset.
You might try setting up on a tripod and zooming on a high contrast subject and taking several shots at wide open aperture and manual focusing in very small adjustments, you may find a nice "sweet spot" in the focus range that way. This will tell you that the cameras AF is out of synch with the lense and that it WILL take good, sharp shots, but that you will definitely have to get it cleaned and adjusted for your camera. Hope you got a pood price on it.
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all ... (show quote)
Took it for a test drive but was urban (LCD did no... (show quote)


I shoot wildlife also, here is a shot with my Sigma, don't think you can fault the sharpness here.
Good luck with the lens, its a good bright sunlight lens if you get the focus working for you.



Reply
Jan 13, 2012 10:43:42   #
rufus1 Loc: Winter Haven, Florida
 
Thanks for your interest, let me show you the problem
MT Shooter wrote:
rufus1 wrote:
Took it for a test drive but was urban (LCD did not show flaws), most of what I shot is landscape and wildlife. Even had my eyes checked because it was getting so bad. My 70-200mm seems fine. It isn't a major loss of cash but sure has shaken my confidence
MT Shooter wrote:
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all have repeated excellent reviews for sharpness, albeit a little slow due to the aperture rating. I have used one on a tryout and was impressed with the sharpness, but did not buy it as it did not improve the image over the 400mm F5.6 Sigma prime I was already using.
I notice you bought this particular lens used, hopefully from a dealer such as B&H, KEH or Adorama who all give you at least 30 day money-back guarantee. If you bought it from an individual I would have hoped you had tried it out before buying it.
In either case, to give any USED lens a bad review is hardly objective as you typically have no history as to the use or abuse of that lense. Buying a used lense is the same as buying a used car, you get what you got unless it comes with some sort of guarantee from a reputable dealer. I am sorry you got a bad deal but due diligence in any used purchase is a buyers best asset.
You might try setting up on a tripod and zooming on a high contrast subject and taking several shots at wide open aperture and manual focusing in very small adjustments, you may find a nice "sweet spot" in the focus range that way. This will tell you that the cameras AF is out of synch with the lense and that it WILL take good, sharp shots, but that you will definitely have to get it cleaned and adjusted for your camera. Hope you got a pood price on it.
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all ... (show quote)
Took it for a test drive but was urban (LCD did no... (show quote)


I shoot wildlife also, here is a shot with my Sigma, don't think you can fault the sharpness here.
Good luck with the lens, its a good bright sunlight lens if you get the focus working for you.
quote=rufus1 Took it for a test drive but was urb... (show quote)

Within 20 feet
Within 20 feet...

Focus on Heron about 500 feet
Focus on Heron about 500 feet...

Reply
Jan 13, 2012 17:43:17   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
I have to agree, they are definitely out of focus. It almost appears in both photos as though the actual focal point is in FRONT of the object you are focusing on. Have you tried spot focus? If so, the the AF sensor is definitely off and manual focus, or recalibration by a good shop, might be necessary. Some of the branches in front of the cardinal are in better focus than he is, and it looks like the duck in the water is in better focus than the heron. Low level shots like the heron are often tough on the multipoint AF anyway, as is the multitude of small branches with the jay.

Reply
Jan 13, 2012 18:38:03   #
rufus1 Loc: Winter Haven, Florida
 
Thanks MT you are seeing the problem. Now it is decision time to repair or replace. Take care. Allen

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2012 18:39:01   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
Glad to help when I can. Good luck.

Reply
Jan 13, 2012 18:47:22   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
I agree that the stuff in front of the Cardinal looks pretty sharp in this thumbnail. Can't tell on the other one with the thumbnail.

You may want to check this out:

http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

Please note the info below the input changes as well when you do the calculation.

I was surprised to see how narrow DOF can be in some situations. Perhaps more careful spot focusing could help?


rufus1 wrote:
Thanks for your interest, let me show you the problem
MT Shooter wrote:
rufus1 wrote:
Took it for a test drive but was urban (LCD did not show flaws), most of what I shot is landscape and wildlife. Even had my eyes checked because it was getting so bad. My 70-200mm seems fine. It isn't a major loss of cash but sure has shaken my confidence
MT Shooter wrote:
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all have repeated excellent reviews for sharpness, albeit a little slow due to the aperture rating. I have used one on a tryout and was impressed with the sharpness, but did not buy it as it did not improve the image over the 400mm F5.6 Sigma prime I was already using.
I notice you bought this particular lens used, hopefully from a dealer such as B&H, KEH or Adorama who all give you at least 30 day money-back guarantee. If you bought it from an individual I would have hoped you had tried it out before buying it.
In either case, to give any USED lens a bad review is hardly objective as you typically have no history as to the use or abuse of that lense. Buying a used lense is the same as buying a used car, you get what you got unless it comes with some sort of guarantee from a reputable dealer. I am sorry you got a bad deal but due diligence in any used purchase is a buyers best asset.
You might try setting up on a tripod and zooming on a high contrast subject and taking several shots at wide open aperture and manual focusing in very small adjustments, you may find a nice "sweet spot" in the focus range that way. This will tell you that the cameras AF is out of synch with the lense and that it WILL take good, sharp shots, but that you will definitely have to get it cleaned and adjusted for your camera. Hope you got a pood price on it.
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all ... (show quote)
Took it for a test drive but was urban (LCD did no... (show quote)


I shoot wildlife also, here is a shot with my Sigma, don't think you can fault the sharpness here.
Good luck with the lens, its a good bright sunlight lens if you get the focus working for you.
quote=rufus1 Took it for a test drive but was urb... (show quote)
Thanks for your interest, let me show you the prob... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 13, 2012 18:56:11   #
sinatraman Loc: Vero Beach Florida, Earth,alpha quaudrant
 
check with keh.com they have an inhouse repair center, suposed to have a quick turnaround time. if you go to the website click on repairs answer a few questions they'll give you a "ballpark estimate"

Reply
Jan 13, 2012 19:39:32   #
rufus1 Loc: Winter Haven, Florida
 
Thanks for the calculator-may have been off on the jay, but the heron and ducks in flight should have been fine. Before I break the bank, think I'll backyard test tomorrow.
lleach wrote:
I agree that the stuff in front of the Cardinal looks pretty sharp in this thumbnail. Can't tell on the other one with the thumbnail.

You may want to check this out:

http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

Please note the info below the input changes as well when you do the calculation.

I was surprised to see how narrow DOF can be in some situations. Perhaps more careful spot focusing could help?


rufus1 wrote:
Thanks for your interest, let me show you the problem
MT Shooter wrote:
rufus1 wrote:
Took it for a test drive but was urban (LCD did not show flaws), most of what I shot is landscape and wildlife. Even had my eyes checked because it was getting so bad. My 70-200mm seems fine. It isn't a major loss of cash but sure has shaken my confidence
MT Shooter wrote:
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all have repeated excellent reviews for sharpness, albeit a little slow due to the aperture rating. I have used one on a tryout and was impressed with the sharpness, but did not buy it as it did not improve the image over the 400mm F5.6 Sigma prime I was already using.
I notice you bought this particular lens used, hopefully from a dealer such as B&H, KEH or Adorama who all give you at least 30 day money-back guarantee. If you bought it from an individual I would have hoped you had tried it out before buying it.
In either case, to give any USED lens a bad review is hardly objective as you typically have no history as to the use or abuse of that lense. Buying a used lense is the same as buying a used car, you get what you got unless it comes with some sort of guarantee from a reputable dealer. I am sorry you got a bad deal but due diligence in any used purchase is a buyers best asset.
You might try setting up on a tripod and zooming on a high contrast subject and taking several shots at wide open aperture and manual focusing in very small adjustments, you may find a nice "sweet spot" in the focus range that way. This will tell you that the cameras AF is out of synch with the lense and that it WILL take good, sharp shots, but that you will definitely have to get it cleaned and adjusted for your camera. Hope you got a pood price on it.
The Sigma 170-500, 150-500 and 50-500mm zooms all ... (show quote)
Took it for a test drive but was urban (LCD did no... (show quote)


I shoot wildlife also, here is a shot with my Sigma, don't think you can fault the sharpness here.
Good luck with the lens, its a good bright sunlight lens if you get the focus working for you.
quote=rufus1 Took it for a test drive but was urb... (show quote)
Thanks for your interest, let me show you the prob... (show quote)
I agree that the stuff in front of the Cardinal lo... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2012 19:40:58   #
rufus1 Loc: Winter Haven, Florida
 
Heard of them before on UHH, if I decide to repair will look them up. Thanx
sinatraman wrote:
check with keh.com they have an inhouse repair center, suposed to have a quick turnaround time. if you go to the website click on repairs answer a few questions they'll give you a "ballpark estimate"

Reply
Jan 13, 2012 19:44:59   #
sinatraman Loc: Vero Beach Florida, Earth,alpha quaudrant
 
no problem, havent used them for repair but am a enthusiastic customer of their used gear. all of which comes cleaned and looking good so i assume some of it has been repaired by them.

Reply
Jan 13, 2012 19:47:28   #
rufus1 Loc: Winter Haven, Florida
 
Well, thanks for that, I'll check repair and/or purchase.
sinatraman wrote:
no problem, havent used them for repair but am a enthusiastic customer of their used gear. all of which comes cleaned and looking good so i assume some of it has been repaired by them.

Reply
Jan 14, 2012 05:53:59   #
tomfr Loc: Brevard N.C.
 
If the intention of the purchase was to shoot landscape and wildlife, testing it in an urban setting was rather useless. You are the buyer, it is your money going over the counter. Take it out in the country, or, in a local park to shoot whatever wildlife may be there. Would you buy a used car driving it around the dealer's lot. Too many times consumers are intimidated by the people behind the counter. They are simply supplying a service, they are not the god's of photography.


tomfr

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.