Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Which lens would you choose?
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jan 11, 2012 12:11:47   #
Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
 
Let’s say you just sold your boat and you have some extra cash, you want to buy a lens for your Nikon D90 and it’s (the lens) to be dedicated to taking portraits of the grandkids. You’ll not be using the lens for anything other than taking the portraits so flexibility is not an issue. What lens would you choose and why?

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 12:23:52   #
ebaribeault Loc: Baltimore
 
For portraits considering the crop factor of your camera. I would choose the Nikon 60 mm f2.8. This would be equivalent to a 90 mm on your camera which would be ideal for portraits. I have this lens and used it on my old D80 and my D300 with excellent results

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 13:12:03   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
I'd pick the Nikon 85mm 1.8. Great Bokeh and shallow depth of field. Beutiful lens for portraits.

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 13:29:41   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
see what you think of this lens
http://www.cameralabs.com/lenses/lens_buyers_guide/Nikon_Nikkor_lenses/Which_portrait_lens/Which_Nikkor_Nikon_portrait_wedding_low-light_lens.shtml

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 13:38:12   #
ebaribeault Loc: Baltimore
 


Actually this would be a good lens choice quicker than the 60 f2.8 and would equate to 75mm on his camera whice is a good focal length for portraits

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 13:38:59   #
Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
 
Thanks to all for taking time to help me with this. Question is the 85mm 1.4 really worth almost 4 times the money as the 1.8?

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 13:49:30   #
ebaribeault Loc: Baltimore
 
Pepper wrote:
Thanks to all for taking time to help me with this. Question is the 85mm 1.4 really worth almost 4 times the money as the 1.8?


Others will have a different opininon well we all have one as the line goes. I would never buy a 1.4 the reason being the depth of field is really shallow at 1.4 a 1.8 can be bad enough. Granted there are times when you want a shallow depth of field just never desired a 1.4. Well thats my nickle for what its worth. You did get alot of diversity in choices here and frankly all our good. If you can go to a camera store with camera in hand and ask to take some shots with the various lenses see which one you like the best and then buy it from that camera store. We need to support our local camera stores they are falling buy the wayside if we dont

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 13:58:55   #
Bmac Loc: Long Island, NY
 
Pepper wrote:
Thanks to all for taking time to help me with this. Question is the 85mm 1.4 really worth almost 4 times the money as the 1.8?


No

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 15:28:05   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
ebaribeault wrote:


Actually this would be a good lens choice quicker than the 60 f2.8 and would equate to 75mm on his camera whice is a good focal length for portraits


Actually that 60mm F2.8 becomes the 35mm equivalent of a 90mm on the 1.5x crop factor Nikon. A 50mm becomes the equivalent of a 75mm.

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 15:49:38   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
Pepper wrote:
Let’s say you just sold your boat and you have some extra cash, you want to buy a lens for your Nikon D90 and it’s (the lens) to be dedicated to taking portraits of the grandkids. You’ll not be using the lens for anything other than taking the portraits so flexibility is not an issue. What lens would you choose and why?


tamron 90

it's cheap it's fast glass, it gives you the equivalent of roughly 135 mm and it doubles as a great macro

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 15:50:47   #
Erv Loc: Medina Ohio
 
Is n't the 60 also a micro? If it is, that would be a two for. The 60 I have is old and does micro.
Erv

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 15:55:54   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Yes it is a micro (macro).

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 17:21:32   #
Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
 
You guys are great and I truly appreciate the time you take to help us newbies. All things considered I think I'm going to settle on the 85mm 1.8, of course I may change my mind by morning (I always sleep on these kind of decisions). Thanks again to all.
Pepper

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 17:28:07   #
ebaribeault Loc: Baltimore
 
Pepper wrote:
You guys are great and I truly appreciate the time you take to help us newbies. All things considered I think I'm going to settle on the 85mm 1.8, of course I may change my mind by morning (I always sleep on these kind of decisions). Thanks again to all.
Pepper


You are welcome we are here to help one another

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 18:04:23   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
MT Shooter wrote:
ebaribeault wrote:


Actually this would be a good lens choice quicker than the 60 f2.8 and would equate to 75mm on his camera whice is a good focal length for portraits


Actually that 60mm F2.8 becomes the 35mm equivalent of a 90mm on the 1.5x crop factor Nikon. A 50mm becomes the equivalent of a 75mm.
quote=ebaribeault quote=dirtpusher see what you ... (show quote)


thats what i need to learn the crop factors. an like how a 50 mm becomes a 75 mm

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.