Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Astronomical Photography Forum
Star Trails
Apr 25, 2014 15:44:15   #
gwong1 Loc: Tampa, FL
 
I am new to this, and bought a cheap e-bay battery grip intervalometer for my camera. The first night out I forgot about the on/off switch, and thought the cheap knock off does not work, worked at home. The second night I thought I better shoot in my backyard and got everything to work.
So last night I went to Myakka SP and shot to the SW so I could get a palm tree in the foreground, to make the shot a little more interesting, and the horizon with the sunset.
So the question I have for everyone is why I have three sets of star trails? One circles to the right, the middle is mostly straight and the left side circles in the opposite direction. I am attaching two images one as shot and stacked, and one with text remarks by me.
I used Startrails 2.3 to stack the images. I shot 212, 30 second exposures, with a 5 sec. delay between exposures. I set my camera to ISO 250, and lens set to infinity and at 10 mm (16mm equiv.). Canon 7D and EF-S 10-22mm lens.
Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank You, Gary

Original Stacked Image
Original Stacked Image...
(Download)

My text with obervations
My text with obervations...
(Download)

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 15:45:48   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Your camera with wide-angle lens is aimed West or East. If you aim North, you will see star Polaris, around which the northern hemisphere pivots, causing arced star trails centered on Polaris. Below the Equator, aiming your camera due South will capture similar results circling around the southern pivot point.

Lincoln Harrison is my favorite star trailer. Here is his Flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hakka69 Scroll down to see scores of star trail images.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 16:02:15   #
gwong1 Loc: Tampa, FL
 
Thank you, I was pointed SW. So why two arcs? I shot this in Sarasota, FL.Gary

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2014 16:06:45   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
gwong1 wrote:
I was pointed SW. So why two arcs? I shot this in Sarasota, FL.Gary
Stars 'north' of the equator leave trails arcing around Polaris; stars directly above the equator leave straight star trails; stars 'south' of equator leave trails arcing around southern hemisphere pivot point.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 16:34:59   #
gwong1 Loc: Tampa, FL
 
Thanks again, I did not think I could see stars south of the equator. Gary
Nikonian72 wrote:
Stars 'north' of the equator leave trails arcing around Polaris; stars directly above the equator leave straight star trails; stars 'south' of equator leave trails arcing around southern hemisphere pivot point.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 16:56:00   #
mechengvic Loc: SoCalo
 
are you sure it's not due to the curvature of your wide angle lens?

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 19:21:21   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
mechengvic wrote:
are you sure it's not due to the curvature of your wide angle lens?
Most star-trail photographers use wide-angler lenses. Look here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hakka69/sets/72157625419059738

Reply
 
 
Apr 26, 2014 02:29:18   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
Take a look at this Wikipedia page and watch the animated .gif on the right. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declination
Then you can more readily visualize what you are seeing and why you can see stars south of the equator. You are on a sphere and when you look toward the horizon that is a tangent. You can't see southern sky that is below your horizon.
Take a globe and ruler. Put the middle of the ruler on Sarasota parallel to the lines of longitude N-S. The ruler is now part of a cone as the earth rotates. Everything outside the cone you can see. Under the cone you can't see. Put the ruler on the equator and now it's a cylinder.
If I took that exact same picture where I'm located the angle of the straight trails would be greater because I'm at 47 deg N and you are at 27 deg N. My picture would show more trails to the right. My "cone" is fatter than yours. At the North Pole there would be no cone. If you took this picture at the Pole, the straight trails would be horizontal. At the equator they would be vertical.
I hope I'm not patronizing...

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 06:44:45   #
mrova Loc: Chesterfield, VA
 
Skylane, your clarification along with the other answers are a big help for me. I'd had the same question with some of my star trail shots and always thought it was the 'distortion' (for lack of a better word) of my wide angle lens...but then I'm so new at this too, so lots of learning.
Thanks to the OP for the question, and to the others for the answers!

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 08:13:16   #
gwong1 Loc: Tampa, FL
 
Skylane5sp, Thank you for your explanation, which now makes sense to me. I also contacted Douglas Vincent, who is also an astro photographer, and got this reply, very similar to yours. Thanks again, Gary http://www.astronomynotes.com/nakedeye/s4.htm
http://www.douglasvincent.com/photography/star-trails/
skylane5sp wrote:
Take a look at this Wikipedia page and watch the animated .gif on the right. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declination
Then you can more readily visualize what you are seeing and why you can see stars south of the equator. You are on a sphere and when you look toward the horizon that is a tangent. You can't see southern sky that is below your horizon.
Take a globe and ruler. Put the middle of the ruler on Sarasota parallel to the lines of longitude N-S. The ruler is now part of a cone as the earth rotates. Everything outside the cone you can see. Under the cone you can't see. Put the ruler on the equator and now it's a cylinder.
If I took that exact same picture where I'm located the angle of the straight trails would be greater because I'm at 47 deg N and you are at 27 deg N. My picture would show more trails to the right. My "cone" is fatter than yours. At the North Pole there would be no cone. If you took this picture at the Pole, the straight trails would be horizontal. At the equator they would be vertical.
I hope I'm not patronizing...
Take a look at this Wikipedia page and watch the a... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 08:15:04   #
gwong1 Loc: Tampa, FL
 
Douglas, Thank you again. I also contacted Douglas Vincent, who is also an astro photographer, and got this reply, very similar to yours. Thanks again, Gary http://www.astronomynotes.com/nakedeye/s4.htm
http://www.douglasvincent.com/photography/star-trails/
Nikonian72 wrote:
Stars 'north' of the equator leave trails arcing around Polaris; stars directly above the equator leave straight star trails; stars 'south' of equator leave trails arcing around southern hemisphere pivot point.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Astronomical Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.