Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What is ruining wedding photography
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Aug 21, 2014 19:32:41   #
f8lee Loc: New Mexico
 
First of all, excellent original posting rant!

But the industry has been dramatically affected by technological advancements and further by digitalization - think about it, 30+ years ago one had to know the craft of exposure and composition as well as be selective about when the shutter release was pressed (due to limitations on film), then along came auto-exposure and auto focus and then digital. The latter being the most destructive the the old ways since the marginal cost of additional shots is essentially zero (thus the "run & gun/spray & pray methodologies). Technology in general eliminates jobs, but I just read a fascinating comparison of Kodak and Instagram, where it was pointed out that the former made George Eastman very rich but also created tens of thousands of middle-class jobs for the chemical, paper, processing and distribution arenas in which Kodak had great sway. Compare that to Instagram, which was created by a handful of guys and has no need for anyone else to make it work, making them far wealthier than Eastman ever was. Meanwhile, the sheer number of photos taken has grown enormously - something like 85 billion photos were taken in 2000, which sounds like a lot, but to date 3.5 trillion+ photos have been taken since the very first image was recorded. The point is, thanks to technology the number of photos taken by people has been rising at an exponential rate. As a result, they are not perceived as being so "special" any more.

Sadly, there's no way to reverse the trend - as time goes on fewer people will care for "that perfect shot" since imagery has become background fabric in everyday life.

Reply
Aug 27, 2014 15:53:09   #
bkyser Loc: Fly over country in Indiana
 
Just as I enjoy indoor plumbing, I enjoy the benefits of modern cameras and the technology that goes with it. As with everything, it all changes. I feel for the next generations. The care and artistry that used to be a part of the job, will be to just shoot thousands, push a button to batch process, and hand the B&G a disk, or whatever the newest form of storage is at the time, and let them figure it out. At least as it is now, most the images will never be put on paper, and they will disappear when the disk gets lost, or the files corrupted. Paper isn't sexy, but I still say it is the BEST way to store the pictures you hold dear. Even faded pictures look better than staring at a corrupt hard drive with an unrecoverable error.

Reply
Aug 27, 2014 16:50:38   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
Three times a year, my wife's company shoots publicity theme shots. The public likes them and the employees like them. I am a fairly good photographer and I have all the equipment but, I never go to the shoot with anything but my iPhone. We pay a professional a high rate, in my opinion - several thousand dollars, and he shoots fewer than 150 shots. Everyone is happy and the shots turn out great. It is my opinion that you usually get what you pay for.

Reply
 
 
Nov 28, 2014 22:49:42   #
greg vescuso Loc: Ozark,Mo.
 
I really agree with what your saying. I know I'm not a professional wedding photographer but I really love the whole process and being part of how the day unfolds. I have only shot nine weddings and all of them have been for friends or family. But in my very short wedding shooting I really agree with only giving the couple enough images to complete a beautiful album and the reception shots of the day unfolding. The last wedding I shot I limited the edited images to just over 300 now I did give the bride another 600 images that were only ran thru light room for color and exposure corrections. Now since the last wedding was my niece I told her if see wants any of the unedited images to print I would edit them for her, that being said I believe the 300 plus edited image will be enough for her and I most likely will never be ask to edit any of the other 600. I think this attitude of wanting 2500 or more images from a wedding is to overwhelming and as you have said they may look thru them once if they even get thru that many it becomes overwhelming to figure out what to do with them. Now as a wedding present I gave my niece a 16x24 print mounted with 2 inch double mate because they need to have at least one good size framed and mated image so they see what a difference there is in the overall quaility. Now I will help her put a album together to share with family when they visit, because I believe all the rest of the images won't be shared as much even being easily accessed on a persons computer. I think this whole craigslist $200 wedding photography just giving the Bride and Groom a disk of Images,and I don't know what amount of editing is even done doesn't help anyone and especially hurts the bride and groom.

Reply
Nov 29, 2014 05:27:42   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
bkyser wrote:
I just hired a new girl under contract to be a second shooter, and was discussing our philosophy on wedding photography. I felt that it may be something to share with other aspiring wedding photographers on the Hog. If you aren't interested, just don't read it. I'm not really interested in all the comments about how you would NEVER want to shoot weddings. After over 30 years, I still get as excited as I did during my first few jobs. I'm trying to be helpful to those that are considering joining this rewarding part of photography.

I'm one that doesn't get offended by others wanting to jump into the wedding "biz." We generally have a few people that we are training to eventually become our competition, or maybe just to continue working with us.

We now have to compete with Craigslist Wedding Photographers that offer to shoot weddings for $200 and they give you the disk. Beyond the fact that in today's Wal-Mart mentality, makes it very difficult to convince people that you "get what you pay for," the fact is that the newer generation of photographers never had to watch costs.

We do offer the disk of "candid" photos from the reception, because those are mostly taken by our lowest tier of "employee" (contracted "3rd" shooters).... read: free interns that are shooting for us just to get the experience.

We also do include small digital files of any of the photos they purchase prints from us, as we found out that they would just scan the print and post it on facebook anyway, this way we can put a small "Olan Mills" type watermark in the corner to at least get some credit.

Here's the big issue that I think hurts all of us, and it is actually ruining wedding photographers everwhere, because people just don't end up actually displaying their wedding photos like they used to. That's probably a reason why people don't find wedding photos as "important" as they used to be.

I see wedding photographers that routinely snap 5000 images of a wedding. They even put the high numbers in their advertisements, like it is a great thing. We are old school film photographers that moved to digital, so we still choose our shots. Our average wedding starts with 500 shots or less, and that includes the reception "snap shots", and we cull out from there.

Do some of the machine gun photographers get outstanding images? I'm sure they do, I would just be overwhelmed if someone gave me a disk of 5000 images and asked me to find a "few to print" Ouch! I think that type of stuff is what is ruining the wedding business. I'm guessing after searching the disks that the photographer just burns and hands to the couple, it is burried in a drawer and not looked at again, or at least not very often.

Gone are the days of having a nice album set out on a table, and a few photos on the wall, and giving a few to their family. Now, they are just so overwhelmed, they just don't get around to choosing photos.

So, if you are planning on getting into the business, think of the end result before you ever push the shutter on the first image. We should all try to get back to working on quality, not just quantity and hoping a few are "wall hangers" Shoot for the album, shoot for the wall.

OK, I'm off my soapbox.
I just hired a new girl under contract to be a sec... (show quote)


You hit the nail on the head - but a photographer is not selling a product - they are selling a service. You want your prospects to use you because you, unlike anyone else, will provide them with exactly what they "need" and draw that all important distinction between "need" and "want" - which basically puts you in the category of managing expectations. As a photographer you need to stress the value you add, and the type of experience the prospect will have with you working for them. Your other job is to educate - at the end of the day, the client will end up with a wonderful record of the event, memorialized in glorious print, etc etc etc. The number of images taken has nothing to do with value - you can give a camera to a chimp and they can end up with as many, or more images. But your images will tell a wonderful story of the day's events from start to finish, capturing the precious moments and those candid ones.

What I lament is the loss of professionalism and salesmanship. Today's wedding photographers forget that it's not about them or their gear, it's all about the bride (or bridezilla), and they are paid to manage that experience.

On another forum that I am active on a photographer was looking for sympathy because the client did not provide them a meal - excuse me - you are paid to work, not eat. It is no different than working for any other client - you cannot expect meals - you make necessary arrangements - bring a sandwich, a piece of fruit and a beverage in a lunch bag. Again, its that lack of professionalism that is missing today that concerns me.

Reply
Dec 2, 2014 09:14:33   #
bkyser Loc: Fly over country in Indiana
 
Gene51 wrote:
You hit the nail on the head - but a photographer is not selling a product - they are selling a service. You want your prospects to use you because you, unlike anyone else, will provide them with exactly what they "need" and draw that all important distinction between "need" and "want" - which basically puts you in the category of managing expectations. As a photographer you need to stress the value you add, and the type of experience the prospect will have with you working for them. Your other job is to educate - at the end of the day, the client will end up with a wonderful record of the event, memorialized in glorious print, etc etc etc. The number of images taken has nothing to do with value - you can give a camera to a chimp and they can end up with as many, or more images. But your images will tell a wonderful story of the day's events from start to finish, capturing the precious moments and those candid ones.

What I lament is the loss of professionalism and salesmanship. Today's wedding photographers forget that it's not about them or their gear, it's all about the bride (or bridezilla), and they are paid to manage that experience.

On another forum that I am active on a photographer was looking for sympathy because the client did not provide them a meal - excuse me - you are paid to work, not eat. It is no different than working for any other client - you cannot expect meals - you make necessary arrangements - bring a sandwich, a piece of fruit and a beverage in a lunch bag. Again, its that lack of professionalism that is missing today that concerns me.
You hit the nail on the head - but a photographer ... (show quote)


I hear you about the meals. We are constantly told by family that they want us to grab something to eat, or "there's plenty." Our rule is that we bring something along with is IF we need to grab a bite. Usually something quick, like a granola bar. We politely explain that we are paid to capture the shots, and if we are sitting down and eating, we can't do that.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.