Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon D40 IR Conversion. Anyone?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 20, 2014 11:54:27   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
I'm thinking of having LifePixel convert my D40 to IR, using their Super Color filter. They say that the D40, among others, doesn't do the custom WB very well. I thought I'd ask others before taking the plunge. I had a D70 converted with the normal IR filter, and that works fine.

Reply
Apr 20, 2014 13:39:09   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I'm thinking of having LifePixel convert my D40 to IR, using their Super Color filter. They say that the D40, among others, doesn't do the custom WB very well. I thought I'd ask others before taking the plunge. I had a D70 converted with the normal IR filter, and that works fine.


i'm familiar with shooting UV in the medical field but what does IR give you?

Reply
Apr 20, 2014 13:49:19   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
oldtigger wrote:
i'm familiar with shooting UV in the medical field but what does IR give you?

Go to leave pixel.com and see the variety of images you can get. Processing with PS, etc., can get an assortment of results. Do a Search here, and you will see some.

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2014 18:48:19   #
MW
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I'm thinking of having LifePixel convert my D40 to IR, using their Super Color filter. They say that the D40, among others, doesn't do the custom WB very well. I thought I'd ask others before taking the plunge. I had a D70 converted with the normal IR filter, and that works fine.


I think they say the same about the D60 which I use for IR. I used my front lawn to create a custom white balance and then used Adobe DNG Editor to reverse the red and blue sensitivity before doing B&W conversion in LR. I don't experience in issues in this regard. Maybe it is more important if you plan to due false color IR.

A bigger issue with the D40 and D60 is the lack of live view which is a way to deal with the fact that autofocus with visible light doesn't always result in very accurate IR focus. Without live view, the work around is smaller apertures and experimentation.

Reply
Apr 20, 2014 19:21:22   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
MW wrote:
I think they say the same about the D60 which I use for IR. I used my front lawn to create a custom white balance and then used Adobe DNG Editor to reverse the red and blue sensitivity before doing B&W conversion in LR. I don't experience in issues in this regard. Maybe it is more important if you plan to due false color IR.

A bigger issue with the D40 and D60 is the lack of live view which is a way to deal with the fact that autofocus with visible light doesn't always result in very accurate IR focus. Without live view, the work around is smaller apertures and experimentation.
I think they say the same about the D60 which I us... (show quote)

It worked perfectly with my D70 using green grass as a reference for WB. that's what you did with the D60, and it worked okay? I have a D3100 I could convert. That has Live View, but it's also on LifePixel's list of less-than-perfect WB cameras.

"Fortunately many cameras still do set a custom WB just fine and even the ones that don’t are totally usable and we get them in for conversion on a daily basis. Currently the following cameras have issues with setting proper WB:

Nikon D40, D60, D90, D300, D300s, D3000, D5000, D7000
Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro
Olympus EVOLT E-520"

Reply
Apr 20, 2014 21:15:05   #
MW
 
jerryc41 wrote:
It worked perfectly with my D70 using green grass as a reference for WB. that's what you did with the D60, and it worked okay? I have a D3100 I could convert. That has Live View, but it's also on LifePixel's list of less-than-perfect WB cameras.

"Fortunately many cameras still do set a custom WB just fine and even the ones that don’t are totally usable and we get them in for conversion on a daily basis. Currently the following cameras have issues with setting proper WB:

Nikon D40, D60, D90, D300, D300s, D3000, D5000, D7000
Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro
Olympus EVOLT E-520"
It worked perfectly with my D70 using green grass ... (show quote)


What would be symptom of a WB problem with a D60? Using mine I don't detect anything obvious. When would I notice it?

Reply
Apr 20, 2014 21:51:00   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
MW wrote:
What would be symptom of a WB problem with a D60? Using mine I don't detect anything obvious. When would I notice it?

If your pictures aren't turning out red, then your WB must be okay.

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2014 22:07:48   #
UtahBob Loc: Southern NJ
 
MW wrote:
What would be symptom of a WB problem with a D60? Using mine I don't detect anything obvious. When would I notice it?


I suspect that you would notice it if you tried to create false color images (yellow trees & deep blue skies for example). Since you are converting to b&w in your ir workflow the in-camera custom white balance setting is getting you what you want for your final image.

I say this because I spent a good hour getting an in-camera white balance on a D7000 with a hoya 72. I was able to get a b&w ir image in post that I could live with but nothing false color. My D70 works great with the hoya 72. Now you might say a converted camera wouldn't have the same issue but I think the only difference between a converted camera and one using an ir filter such as the hoya 72 is the exposure required - longer shutter speeds and larger apertures. You'd still need the custom in-camera white balance with the converted camera. This is just a suspicion on my part but it would make sense given that the D7000 is one of the cameras listed that may not do in-camera custom wb acceptably for converted cameras.

I recall reading somewhere that even after the custom in-camera white balance, you can adjust the wb even further using adobe's dng converter. I didn't try that with the D7000 images.

If the D40 behaves like the D7000 in terms of setting a custom in-camera wb, then I would be hesitant to do a conversion if my target was false color. I think the cleanest way for Jerry to figure this out if no one here responds would be to put a hoya 72 or equivalent ir filter on the unconverted camera and see if you can process to an acceptable false color image. If you don't have an ir filter you might be able to have your local camera store let you borrow one for the test.

Reply
Apr 20, 2014 22:38:16   #
UtahBob Loc: Southern NJ
 
jerryc41 wrote:
If your pictures aren't turning out red, then your WB must be okay.


I just remembered where I stuck my raw. Here is a screen shot from viewnx2 of the straight out of camera shot using the best custom white balance I could set on that D7000 with a hoya 72 on it (this is an unconverted body). In my opinion, it really does not look red so I think the wb is probably the best I could manage. If you execute a levels adjustment and then desaturate, you have something usable for further pp but doing a channel swap doesn't really get me anything usable.

I'd probably trust the conversion guys on their opinion but it depends on what your end goal is - now that I look at this in b&w, I might have to take out the d7000 and try some b&w ir with the hoya.

Good luck on this ... Bob


(Download)

Reply
Apr 21, 2014 06:08:21   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
UtahBob wrote:
I just remembered where I stuck my raw. Here is a screen shot from viewnx2 of the straight out of camera shot using the best custom white balance I could set on that D7000 with a hoya 72 on it (this is an unconverted body). In my opinion, it really does not look red so I think the wb is probably the best I could manage. If you execute a levels adjustment and then desaturate, you have something usable for further pp but doing a channel swap doesn't really get me anything usable.

I'd probably trust the conversion guys on their opinion but it depends on what your end goal is - now that I look at this in b&w, I might have to take out the d7000 and try some b&w ir with the hoya.

Good luck on this ... Bob
I just remembered where I stuck my raw. Here is a... (show quote)

I used to shoot IR film in the old days, with the deep red filter. The advantage of the conversion is short shutter times.

Reply
Apr 21, 2014 06:55:54   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
I'd listen to LifePixel. I had my D300 converted and have a hard time getting an CWB and with a super color filter it's even harder to get a CWB. Another company to convert your camera is Kolarivision.com

Reply
 
 
Apr 21, 2014 07:21:04   #
SqBear Loc: Kansas, (South Central)
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Go to leave pixel.com and see the variety of images you can get. Processing with PS, etc., can get an assortment of results. Do a Search here, and you will see some.


Jerry I tried your link (but it was not hot in your post) like this; leave_pixel.com and leavepixel.com neither worked for me. Used two different browsers, still says it not a good link, sorry.

Reply
Apr 21, 2014 07:31:18   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
http://www.lifepixel.com
SqBear wrote:
Jerry I tried your link (but it was not hot in your post) like this; leave_pixel.com and leavepixel.com neither worked for me. Used two different browsers, still says it not a good link, sorry.

Reply
Apr 21, 2014 07:31:21   #
fotogk Loc: Tuftonboro, NH
 
lifepixel.com

Reply
Apr 21, 2014 07:38:31   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
SqBear wrote:
Jerry I tried your link (but it was not hot in your post) like this; leave_pixel.com and leavepixel.com neither worked for me. Used two different browsers, still says it not a good link, sorry.

Sorry about that. Maybe I can blame it on autocorrect. :oops:

I guess you found that it's -

http://www.lifepixel.com/

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.