Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
dark sky photography
Apr 18, 2014 13:23:16   #
shutterbob Loc: Tucson
 
I am headed to Hawaii in a couple of months and plan to drive up Haleakala on Maui and Mauna Kea on the Big Island. I want to shoot time exposures of the Milky Way, capturing the reds, greens oranges, etc. I will be using a Nikon D610, but don't know the best lens, settings, etc. I have read everything from needing a f1.4 wide angle for 30 seconds to a f2.8 normal for 2 minutes, which seems to me would leave star trails, which I do not want. Any help. I am willing to spend $$$$ for the right lens.

Reply
Apr 18, 2014 13:27:42   #
ptcanon3ti Loc: NJ
 
As far as star trails are concerned - The time of your exposure will depend on the focal length of your lens, not the aperture.

For FF cameras if you use the formula - 600 divided by the focal length - that should give you a safe time to leave your shutter open to avoid trailing.

Ex: 600/24 (if using a 24mm lens) = 25. So you should be safe with a 25 second exposure without star trails.

Reply
Apr 18, 2014 17:49:13   #
mechengvic Loc: SoCalo
 
shutterbob wrote:
I am headed to Hawaii in a couple of months and plan to drive up Haleakala on Maui and Mauna Kea on the Big Island. I want to shoot time exposures of the Milky Way, capturing the reds, greens oranges, etc. I will be using a Nikon D610, but don't know the best lens, settings, etc. I have read everything from needing a f1.4 wide angle for 30 seconds to a f2.8 normal for 2 minutes, which seems to me would leave star trails, which I do not want. Any help. I am willing to spend $$$$ for the right lens.
I am headed to Hawaii in a couple of months and pl... (show quote)


The shorter the focal length of your lens, the longer you can expose. Once you start zooming in, motion blur becomes more noticeable so you have to shorten exposure times. The low light gathering power of your D610 should allow you to use higher iso's and smaller apertures, but if you're willing to get the best then a fast lens with a focal length of 50mm or less will work. If you want to capture whole skies then get a wide angle (Nikon 24mm f/1.4 G AF-S). As far as settings go, you'll find your camera is capable of capturing amazing details in a wide variety of settings. Use a remote and experiment!

Reply
 
 
Apr 18, 2014 19:13:19   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
shutterbob wrote:
I am headed to Hawaii in a couple of months and plan to drive up Haleakala on Maui and Mauna Kea on the Big Island. I want to shoot time exposures of the Milky Way, capturing the reds, greens oranges, etc. I will be using a Nikon D610, but don't know the best lens, settings, etc. I have read everything from needing a f1.4 wide angle for 30 seconds to a f2.8 normal for 2 minutes, which seems to me would leave star trails, which I do not want. Any help. I am willing to spend $$$$ for the right lens.
I am headed to Hawaii in a couple of months and pl... (show quote)

The 14-24mm F/2.8 is popular.
The 24mm F/1.4 is as well.
Or you can go the Rokinon/Bower/Samyang/Pro Optics versions for a lot less money and surprisingly good image quality, just don't drop them.

600 over focal length for maximum exposure time to keep star points. So 24mm lens up to 25 secs and 14mm lens up to 42 secs.
ISO 800-1600-3200 will probably be required.

Reply
Apr 19, 2014 05:49:01   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
shutterbob wrote:
I am headed to Hawaii in a couple of months and plan to drive up Haleakala on Maui and Mauna Kea on the Big Island. I want to shoot time exposures of the Milky Way, capturing the reds, greens oranges, etc. I will be using a Nikon D610, but don't know the best lens, settings, etc. I have read everything from needing a f1.4 wide angle for 30 seconds to a f2.8 normal for 2 minutes, which seems to me would leave star trails, which I do not want. Any help. I am willing to spend $$$$ for the right lens.
I am headed to Hawaii in a couple of months and pl... (show quote)


There is a 500 rule. Basically you divide 500 by your focal length, and that will give you the longest shutter speed before you get star trails. With a full frame camera, 20mm lens means you can use a 25 sec exposure before you get noticeable trails.

You might want to take a look at this article:

http://photographylife.com/how-to-photograph-the-milky-way

Reply
Apr 19, 2014 06:19:58   #
Nightski
 
Gene51 wrote:
There is a 500 rule. Basically you divide 500 by your focal length, and that will give you the longest shutter speed before you get star trails. With a full frame camera, 20mm lens means you can use a 25 sec exposure before you get noticeable trails.

You might want to take a look at this article:

http://photographylife.com/how-to-photograph-the-milky-way


Thanks for this link, Gene. It's a good one. I copied and pasted it into my email for future reference.

Reply
Apr 19, 2014 06:21:56   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Nightski wrote:
Thanks for this link, Gene. It's a good one. I copied and pasted it into my email for future reference.


Great! Post some pics when you get a chance.

Reply
 
 
Apr 19, 2014 06:25:53   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
lighthouse wrote:
The 14-24mm F/2.8 is popular.
The 24mm F/1.4 is as well.
Or you can go the Rokinon/Bower/Samyang/Pro Optics versions for a lot less money and surprisingly good image quality, just don't drop them.

600 over focal length for maximum exposure time to keep star points. So 24mm lens up to 25 secs and 14mm lens up to 42 secs.
ISO 800-1600-3200 will probably be required.


Haven't done this in an while, but from what I remember, the 600 rule was not good enough to avoid star trails. The 500 rule with its shorter max exposure is better.

Reply
Apr 19, 2014 07:10:50   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Gene51 wrote:
Haven't done this in an while, but from what I remember, the 600 rule was not good enough to avoid star trails. The 500 rule with its shorter max exposure is better.


Yes, you are right, its close but by converting it to the 500 rule brings in a margin of safety.

Reply
Apr 19, 2014 10:45:39   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
shutterbob wrote:
I am headed to Hawaii in a couple of months and plan to drive up Haleakala on Maui and Mauna Kea on the Big Island. I want to shoot time exposures of the Milky Way, capturing the reds, greens oranges, etc. I will be using a Nikon D610, but don't know the best lens, settings, etc. I have read everything from needing a f1.4 wide angle for 30 seconds to a f2.8 normal for 2 minutes, which seems to me would leave star trails, which I do not want. Any help. I am willing to spend $$$$ for the right lens.
I am headed to Hawaii in a couple of months and pl... (show quote)

You won't be alone up there, so be prepared to arrive early and stake out a spot.

If you Google "star photography," you will get dozens of articles.

Reply
Apr 19, 2014 18:42:44   #
lhdiver Loc: Midwest
 
There is a new book now available on Amazon.com, Photography Night Sky: A Field Guide for Shooting After Dark by Jennifer Wu. Saw her live recently & am sure it will be good, just placed my order.

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2014 04:35:48   #
AIR BOSS 1 Loc: western new york
 
lighthouse wrote:
The 14-24mm F/2.8 is popular.
The 24mm F/1.4 is as well.
Or you can go the Rokinon/Bower/Samyang/Pro Optics versions for a lot less money and surprisingly good image quality, just don't drop them.

600 over focal length for maximum exposure time to keep star points. So 24mm lens up to 25 secs and 14mm lens up to 42 secs.
ISO 800-1600-3200 will probably be required.


where do you get 600 from?

Reply
Apr 20, 2014 04:41:39   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
AIR BOSS 1 wrote:
where do you get 600 from?


It's a rule of thumb that some use. Others uses a more conservative 500. It has to do with the magnification of the image on the sensor, and how much movement will be recorded as a trail. Through trial and error, it has been established that if you do not exceed 500 (or 600) over the effective focal length in seconds, you will minimize the trails.

Reply
Apr 20, 2014 05:15:56   #
AIR BOSS 1 Loc: western new york
 
Gene51 wrote:
It's a rule of thumb that some use. Others uses a more conservative 500. It has to do with the magnification of the image on the sensor, and how much movement will be recorded as a trail. Through trial and error, it has been established that if you do not exceed 500 (or 600) over the effective focal length in seconds, you will minimize the trails.


OK Thanks

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.