Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
How much time do you spend on processing?
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
Apr 10, 2014 09:05:41   #
cbercy Loc: Santa Rosa Valley, CA
 
The PP depends on the control I had of the subject and the lighting when I took the shot. I take a lot of travel photos and I rarely have perfect lighting. First I get rid of the losers and then I work on each picture like it was my baby. Best case I'm done in a few minutes, worst case it becomes a never ending work-in-progress. I have no shame; I will add sky and clouds, remove people and objects and even create HDR from one exposure. Sometimes I just decide to go in another direction and completely redo the PP.

Reply
Apr 10, 2014 09:11:37   #
pithydoug Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
 
wingnut1956 wrote:
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much time is generally spent editing an average raw photo. I'm pretty new to messing with "raw" photos and have found it can take a LOT of time with all the things you can play around with. I subscribed to Adobe and have access to both lightroom and photoshop..so far have been playing mostly with lightroom, mostly because I found some great tutorials online. Still, I find myself spending more time than I seem to have available and have a real hard time deciding what's "right" and knowing when to stop
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much ... (show quote)


I did a lot of tutorials on youtube so I became fairly competent with LR. I find I spend maybe a minute or two at most. In general, the better you get the shot in camera, the less time you need to spend in PPing.

If you're a perfectionist, you can spend forever. :)

Reply
Apr 10, 2014 09:13:28   #
fjrwillie Loc: MA
 
brucewells wrote:
In his book, Understanding Exposure, Bryan Peterson uses the phrases "technically correct exposure" and "creative exposure" to differentiate between an exposure that is correct and one in which the photographer attempted to add some creativity.

I believe the same concept can be applied here, to a degree. To get my photos to a point where they look good (i.e. white balance, contrast, brightness, color are correct) doesn't take long in Lightroom. Maybe 30-45 seconds per photo. To do something creative with a particular photo will take longer, especially if you pop it over to Photoshop.

As an example, I recently did a shoot at High Bridge Kentucky. Interesting spot in the middle of nowhere. (Google it, and you'll see what I mean). Unfortunately, nearly every shot of the bridge included power lines running through it. There was no way to escape them, during composition of the shots from the primary shooting location. So, on every one of them, I popped them over to Photoshop to remove those lines. Took considerably longer to process that set of images than I would normally have to spend.
In his book, Understanding Exposure, Bryan Peterso... (show quote)


I took your advice and looked up the bridge. Neat place, reminds me of the Kenzua in PA, but that one got blown down by a wind sheer. They left it there. Another neat place

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinzua_Bridge

Willie

Reply
 
 
Apr 10, 2014 09:46:51   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
wingnut1956 wrote:
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much time is generally spent editing an average raw photo. I'm pretty new to messing with "raw" photos and have found it can take a LOT of time with all the things you can play around with. I subscribed to Adobe and have access to both lightroom and photoshop..so far have been playing mostly with lightroom, mostly because I found some great tutorials online. Still, I find myself spending more time than I seem to have available and have a real hard time deciding what's "right" and knowing when to stop
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much ... (show quote)


2 to 60 minutes, usually less than 15.
But I have one at the moment that I want to get right.
Have wrecked it 5 times ... 5 hours ..... will wait a fortnight or so and have another go.

Reply
Apr 10, 2014 09:54:21   #
brucewells Loc: Central Kentucky
 
fjrwillie wrote:
I took your advice and looked up the bridge. Neat place, reminds me of the Kenzua in PA, but that one got blown down by a wind sheer. They left it there. Another neat place

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinzua_Bridge

Willie


Very much so, Willie! Thanks for sharing. It seems photographers and bikers know all the remote destinations! :-) I'm getting some age, and climbed off my Harley the last time a couple years ago.

Reply
Apr 11, 2014 05:34:13   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
wingnut1956 wrote:
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much time is generally spent editing an average raw photo. I'm pretty new to messing with "raw" photos and have found it can take a LOT of time with all the things you can play around with. I subscribed to Adobe and have access to both lightroom and photoshop..so far have been playing mostly with lightroom, mostly because I found some great tutorials online. Still, I find myself spending more time than I seem to have available and have a real hard time deciding what's "right" and knowing when to stop
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much ... (show quote)


Often I will edit a set of 500 images from an event in about an hour or two, to a point that is good enough to present to a client as proofs.

On my personal work, the raw conversion is quick - I apply adjustments in Lightroom quickly, and will often finish the image in either Photoshop CC or OnOne Perfect Photo Suite 8, or Portrait Pro Studio 12, depending on the image. The raw conversion is usually not more than a minute or two at most for each image. Sometimes I will be able to batch a group of images that will get the same adjustments, and that saves a ton of time. Images converted in raw converters are seldom finished, nearly all benefit from additional finishing in pixel editors.

Reply
Apr 11, 2014 06:04:26   #
georgevedwards Loc: Essex, Maryland.
 
I start out usually with a quick touch up, maybe less than an hour. But as I am trying for the high grade professional look, I generally come back the next day and see some further adjustments to make. I do not see how I could just restrict this to Raw processing, that is only the precursor to various stages of processing in Photoshop. These processes in Photoshop may repeat as appears necessary, until anything further generates a step backwards, for instance too much noise, too much saturation of color, or too little, too much contrast, so I have to go back a step and realize this is the best I can get. The problem is one evolves, or at least I seem to, and after a long period of time I can see how to use some newfound 'tricks' to make it look even better. I have improved sales considerably with this method. It does work better with say a photo of a popular landmark. If it is a portrait commission you of course may not have the luxury of lengthy critiquing. One way that works for me for a quicker critique is to post it on Facebook. Once I see it in a small almost thumbnail size, a lot of changes of tone and color become more obvious immediately, perhaps the fact that I know it is going to be seen in a few hours by a group of people as it is now 'on display' changes my whole perspective. I get the photo pretty good and then after a few minutes I go back to Facebook and immediately see it is too dark, for instance, or a certain area needs a little burning or dodging, or a color adjustment would make it look better. Again, this procedure is on the quick deadline, tomorrow, but I often end up spending hours making 5 or 6 adjustments. But know if I display it at a gallery in the future I feel much more confident it may become a multiple seller, where I sell one, make another, sell that, etc. Of course you must make your own judgement on how much time you can afford to spend. Knowing when to stop is not always obvious, I save my work in various stages of development, for instance "File 1", "File 2", "File 2a", "File 2a crop" etc. Often I realize I have made it worse but am able to go back to the better version. Sometimes you mess up and overwrite something you should have saved.
wingnut1956 wrote:
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much time is generally spent editing an average raw photo. I'm pretty new to messing with "raw" photos and have found it can take a LOT of time with all the things you can play around with. I subscribed to Adobe and have access to both lightroom and photoshop..so far have been playing mostly with lightroom, mostly because I found some great tutorials online. Still, I find myself spending more time than I seem to have available and have a real hard time deciding what's "right" and knowing when to stop
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2014 06:50:32   #
redpepper Loc: Central NY
 
If I get WB and exposure right in camera it takes about 30 seconds to tweak clarity and tonal curve. If the WB is off I can spend 10 minutes tweaking skin tones on one image.

Then there're times that I have a certain vision for which way I'd like the image to go. I spend 10 minutes or more on that one image. I'm quite picky and always zoom in at 100% to analyze which way I will go with it. I've found myself getting frustrated with editing and need to walk away and come back to it later too. PP is an art that takes time to perfect. That justifies my time spent doing it.

Reply
Apr 11, 2014 07:04:15   #
mikedidi46 Loc: WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
 
wingnut1956 wrote:
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much time is generally spent editing an average raw photo. I'm pretty new to messing with "raw" photos and have found it can take a LOT of time with all the things you can play around with. I subscribed to Adobe and have access to both lightroom and photoshop..so far have been playing mostly with lightroom, mostly because I found some great tutorials online. Still, I find myself spending more time than I seem to have available and have a real hard time deciding what's "right" and knowing when to stop
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much ... (show quote)


I do not spend a lot of time, but in LIghtroom 5 I have designed some useful Presets for my use. Usually 3-5 minutes per photo, but I have made copies to use as testing units.

Reply
Apr 11, 2014 07:18:48   #
drmarty Loc: Pine City, NY
 
wingnut1956 wrote:
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much time is generally spent editing an average raw photo. I'm pretty new to messing with "raw" photos and have found it can take a LOT of time with all the things you can play around with. I subscribed to Adobe and have access to both lightroom and photoshop..so far have been playing mostly with lightroom, mostly because I found some great tutorials online. Still, I find myself spending more time than I seem to have available and have a real hard time deciding what's "right" and knowing when to stop
Just a curiosity question..I'm wondering how much ... (show quote)


I work very hard to get my images right in the camera so my pp time is fairly short. Sometimes I spend some extra time experimenting with other settings.

Reply
Apr 11, 2014 08:08:39   #
achesley Loc: SW Louisiana
 
Simply put, about a minute average. I do have some self made presets and a few downloaded ones though. But, I just do them for me. ;-)

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2014 08:10:11   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
joer wrote:
I average between 30 seconds to a minute per image. Now its rare that I try to save an image or create something unusual but I have in the past.


This may be misleading since I use a 7i with 32MB and SSD drives. I can get quite a bit done in a minute.

Reply
Apr 11, 2014 08:32:54   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
Treepusher wrote:
That's like asking how long it takes to cook a meal. It depends on the photo and what I want from it. Some might take a couple of quick adjustments. Some might take hours.


:thumbup:

Reply
Apr 11, 2014 08:36:17   #
aaciolkowski Loc: Sugar Grove Illinois
 
After importing My process is the same as Lis Stockton above. I only go to Photoshop if I am changing background or retouching something.

Reply
Apr 11, 2014 08:38:23   #
aaciolkowski Loc: Sugar Grove Illinois
 
Sorry should be Les Stockton

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.