I was shooting in the exhibitor/vendor hall of an event this weekend, and using an 85mm prime lens produced great pictures, but it was somewhat limiting. It seems that a "mid-range zoom" might be best for situations like this, so I can get shots of different sized groups or a person and their table. The crowds can constrain how much I can move around to "zoom with my feet". Of course I also want the kind of image quality I'm used to with the 85mm.
I would probably need this lens about 6-10 times a year, not often enough to justify the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, but too often to justify renting each time.
I have it narrowed down to these choices:
* Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G VR, $600
* Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4G VR, $1300
* Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS, $900
Feel free to recommend one of these lenses, suggest another lens, that I'm being silly for not getting the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, that I've over-constrained the problem, or just laugh at me. :-)
Hi Amehta, I use Canon but the 24-105 is probably the most used lens I have. The price is fair too compaired to others I have and use less. Good luck.
amehta wrote:
I was shooting in the exhibitor/vendor hall of an event this weekend, and using an 85mm prime lens produced great pictures, but it was somewhat limiting. It seems that a "mid-range zoom" might be best for situations like this, so I can get shots of different sized groups or a person and their table. The crowds can constrain how much I can move around to "zoom with my feet". Of course I also want the kind of image quality I'm used to with the 85mm.
I would probably need this lens about 6-10 times a year, not often enough to justify the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, but too often to justify renting each time.
I have it narrowed down to these choices:
* Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G VR, $600
* Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4G VR, $1300
* Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS, $900
Feel free to recommend one of these lenses, suggest another lens, that I'm being silly for not getting the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, that I've over-constrained the problem, or just laugh at me. :-)
I was shooting in the exhibitor/vendor hall of an ... (
show quote)
mcveed
Loc: Kelowna, British Columbia (between trips)
My 24-120 f4 lives on my D800E. It comes off when I want to use another lens for a specific purpose, then it goes back on. I have read all the criticisms of this lens, including Rockwell's rant on how much better the 28-300 is, but I like the range for general purpose photography and for travel.
You need the Nikon 24-70. It will solve your immediate need, and prove to be a very valued part of your photography for years to come. It is the "event" lens.
I am very happy with my 24-85 f3.5 lens. Fast enough for me and very sharp.
Dennis
traveler90712 wrote:
Your silly! br Although expensive, the 24-70, f/... (
show quote)
Yes, the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 is a solid lens. On the D800, it scores slightly better than the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, it has VC (VR), and it is one-third cheaper.
My problem with the 24-70mm focal length is that it is too limiting. I know it's odd for me to say this, since I have used only primes for almost two years. But it doesn't get to the 85-105mm focal lengths which I like for portraits, which I consider an aspect of my event photography. I know many wedding photographers will use the 24-70mm, but they would also have a 70-200mm on hand, right? My goal is to have a single lens for things like fundraisers, or at least a single primary lens for the event.
You're overlooking the obvious, ametha. With your 36 megapixels, go with a fisheye, one shot from each end of the building and done for the day. Crop as needed.
you are in the right ballpark as far as range is concerned. if price is a factor, then the used market maybe a goo0d option.
This is when I mount my trusty 28-300. Lightweight and covers everything. I know from previous posts you don't like this lens but it is the ultimate "event" lens and does quite well on a D800. Just sayin'... ;)
Db7423 wrote:
This is when I mount my trusty 28-300. Lightweight and covers everything. I know from previous posts you don't like this lens but it is the ultimate "event" lens and does quite well on a D800. Just sayin'... ;)
I use that on my D610. Nice lens.
Db7423 wrote:
This is when I mount my trusty 28-300. Lightweight and covers everything. I know from previous posts you don't like this lens but it is the ultimate "event" lens and does quite well on a D800. Just sayin'... ;)
I still have to do a hands-on evaluation of the Nikon 28-300mm, the two stores I asked about it didn't stock it. There is a local rental place which has it, but I have to convince them to let me rent it just for an hour or two.
I do not think I need a lens going much past 100mm. I don't mind changing lenses occasionally, I just don't want to have to change them for every pair of pictures. But thanks for the suggestion. :-)
jerryc41 wrote:
I use that on my D610. Nice lens.
Yea, it is, Jerry. Maybe the best lens on the market considering the range it covers. Would do Anand's job well with room to spare and also work well for events where additional reach may be required. A twofer? ;)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.