Racism for Obama: The Right continually says that the hatred for Obama is not about racism, Hah! http://www.google.com/search?q=racist%20images%20of%20Obama&tbm=isch...

wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ

The Right continually says that the hatred for Obama is not about racism, Hah!

http://www.google.com/search?q=racist%20images%20of%20Obama&tbm=isch

tlbuljac Loc: Oklahoma

Have to agree with you, they do resemble him at his peak :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol:

davefales Loc: Virginia

I must not be sensitive enough: could someone please explain the Mia Love one? Is she being racist?

Robert Graybeal Loc: Myrtle Beach

How can a picture of a black man be racist?

I guess any one who wants to 'cry' racist can use any excuse.

I'm not racist, I despise his white half just as much.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

wlgoode wrote:

The Right continually says that the hatred for Obama is not about racism, Hah!

http://www.google.com/search?q=racist%20images%20of%20Obama&tbm=isch

Was hatred of Bush by blacks or hispanics racist because he is white? Are critics of Obama who are also blacks racist? I don't hate any one. But I do not approve of Obama's policies. I would not approve of these policies regardless of the race of person who proposes them. About 95% of black voted for Obama, many for no other reason than his race. Thats racist in that it is just as racist to vote for some one because of his race than against his race. If 95% of whites voted for Romney he would be president. And you in your ingorance you would scream racist.

wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ

Robert Graybeal wrote:

How can a picture of a black man be racist?

I guess any one who wants to 'cry' racist can use any excuse.

I'm not racist, I despise his white half just as much.

Believe it or not a racist created the images! Guess that didn't occur to you.

wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ

boberic wrote:

Was hatred of Bush by blacks or hispanics racist b... (show quote)

Why is everyone saying policies and no one is specific about the policies? Everyone on the right was enraged about him before he ever sat in the oval office, what policies pissed you off at that time?

Robert Graybeal Loc: Myrtle Beach

wlgoode wrote:

Believe it or not a racist created the images! Guess that didn't occur to you.

I guess not.
Which racist created the images?
a. Sharpton
b. Jackson
c. Holder
d. the other Obummer

davefales Loc: Virginia

wlgoode wrote:

Why is everyone saying policies and no one is specific about the policies? Everyone on the right was enraged about him before he ever sat in the oval office, what policies pissed you off at that time?

How about this policy that he proposed in 2007: he was going to make the operation of coal-fired power generation so expensive that no one could afford it?

Now that's a policy to build jobs on. :cry:

wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ

davefales wrote:

How about this policy that he proposed in 2007: he was going to make the operation of coal-fired power generation so expensive that no one could afford it?

Now that's a policy to build jobs on. :cry:

Please note: 97% of scientists say our planets meltdown is man caused. GOP hates everything but fossil fuel and won't fund anything but. Want to put people to work? How about the Jobs bill that Boehner would not let come up for a vote? Putting people to work on the infrastructure would create thousands of long lasting high paying jobs. Without harming the earth nearly as much. So would alternative sources of energy. Far more than dirty, nasty coal that even the residents of West Virginia are sick and tired of.
http://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/2014/03/01/jobs-boehner-mcconnell-hypocrisy-blocks-obama-conyers-action-a-467885.html

davefales Loc: Virginia

For the benefit of those who might want to be informed about the current state of the 97% lie:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/09/03/cooks-97-consensus-disproven-by-a-new-paper-showing-major-math-errors/

wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ

davefales wrote:

For the benefit of those who might want to be informed about the current state of the 97% lie:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/09/03/cooks-97-consensus-disproven-by-a-new-paper-showing-major-math-errors/

I can find a bogus site to support that all politicians are alien reptiles.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_do_scientists_believe_global_warming_is_caused_by?#slide=1

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/16/us-climate-scientists-idUSBRE94F00020130516

http://www.wunderground.com/news/startling-number-scientists-dispute-human-caused-global-warming-20140122

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/science-society-seeks-to-shift-dialogue-on-climate-change-by-showing-what-we-know/

Anthony Watts (he and I share our Alma Mater) has made his job to be a dissenter about climate change, not exactly neutral on the subject, heh?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watts_Up_With_That%3F

indycaver Loc: Indianapolis

Comes down to the fact that the narrow minded right can't look in the mirror and see the racism for what it is. Also, man made global warning is a FACT!! The so called dissenting" scientists" are bought and paid for by those who's profit margin might be hurt if the world actually woke up and tried to do something about it before its too late!!

davefales Loc: Virginia

For the benefit of those who might want to be informed about the current state of the 97% lie:

Taking Anthony Watts out of the discussion, the link refers to this abstract that might be enlightening:

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-013-9647-9

I had never heard about agnotology - the study of how ignorance arises via circulation of misinformation calculated to mislead.

Please offer hard proof that the authors are bought and paid for. Thanks.

warwoman Loc: NE Georgia Mtns.

Seems hate plays no favorites!
https://www.google.com/search?q=anti-bush+photos&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=Mn8xU9WQFam90AHhmIDgCQ&ved=0CCUQsAQ&biw=1024&bih=600