Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Pen E-P5?
Mar 23, 2014 07:48:51   #
Chef patty Loc: North Carolina
 
I am considering buying a used Olympus Pen E-P camera. Most reviews sound good but dpreview criticizes the focus. Any comments? Any one using this camera? I have an old Canon Rebel and want to upgrade to a smaller, lighter camera. Thanks.

Reply
Mar 23, 2014 08:02:02   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
I thought E-P5 is very similar to the E-M5. I would not use it for sports or fast moving subject.

Reply
Mar 24, 2014 06:26:01   #
Jackdoor Loc: Huddersfield, Yorkshire.
 
Chef patty wrote:
I am considering buying a used Olympus Pen E-P camera. Most reviews sound good but dpreview criticizes the focus. Any comments? Any one using this camera? I have an old Canon Rebel and want to upgrade to a smaller, lighter camera. Thanks.


I have the EM-5. Same sensor and electronics. Image quality 95% as good as any APC DSLR for half the weight, and some wonderful lenses. (Also half the weight or less). The main drawback is poor focusing on moving objects- it struggles to keep up. Not TOO bad for motor sports or even birds in flight, but hopeless for ball games.
I also have a D800, but only use it if I need focus tracking, or REALLY need the extra 10% IQ or dynamic range. Which ain't often!

Reply
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Mar 24, 2014 06:28:23   #
Jackdoor Loc: Huddersfield, Yorkshire.
 
Chef patty wrote:
I am considering buying a used Olympus Pen E-P camera. Most reviews sound good but dpreview criticizes the focus. Any comments? Any one using this camera? I have an old Canon Rebel and want to upgrade to a smaller, lighter camera. Thanks.


I have the EM-5. Same sensor and electronics. Image quality 95% as good as any APC DSLR for half the weight, and some wonderful lenses. (Also half the weight or less). The main drawback is poor focusing on moving objects- it struggles to keep up. Not TOO bad for motor sports or even birds in flight, but hopeless for ball games.
I also have a D800, but only use it if I need focus tracking, or REALLY need the extra 10% IQ or dynamic range. Which ain't often!

Taken yesterday, robin about 40 feet away, JPEG straight from camera. 1/250s, f7.1, ISO250. Panasonic 100-300 at 300mm
Taken yesterday, robin about 40 feet away, JPEG st...
(Download)

Reply
Mar 24, 2014 06:38:05   #
lukan Loc: Chicago, IL
 
Chef patty wrote:
I am considering buying a used Olympus Pen E-P camera. Most reviews sound good but dpreview criticizes the focus. Any comments? Any one using this camera? I have an old Canon Rebel and want to upgrade to a smaller, lighter camera. Thanks.


The E-P5 is excellent for the money. Couple it with the 25mm, 45mm and 75mm primes and your IQ will leave you wanting for nothing. :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 24, 2014 06:49:39   #
Jackdoor Loc: Huddersfield, Yorkshire.
 
lukan wrote:
The E-P5 is excellent for the money. Couple it with the 25mm, 45mm and 75mm primes and your IQ will leave you wanting for nothing. :thumbup:


Agreed, but not cheap, and only down to 50mm equivalent at the wide end. I love the 14mm Panasonic prime as well as the 100-300. If the budget is tight, the bog standard 14-42 IIR and 40-150 are surprisingly good for the price, at least as good as the usual DSLR kit lenses.
Generally very impressed with the 16 megapixel micro 4/3 system.

Reply
Mar 24, 2014 07:01:54   #
Chef patty Loc: North Carolina
 
Jackdoor wrote:
I have the EM-5. Same sensor and electronics. Image quality 95% as good as any APC DSLR for half the weight, and some wonderful lenses. (Also half the weight or less). The main drawback is poor focusing on moving objects- it struggles to keep up. Not TOO bad for motor sports or even birds in flight, but hopeless for ball games.
I also have a D800, but only use it if I need focus tracking, or REALLY need the extra 10% IQ or dynamic range. Which ain't often!
I have the EM-5. Same sensor and electronics. Imag... (show quote)


Lovey shot. Thanks for the information.

Reply
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Mar 24, 2014 07:02:30   #
Chef patty Loc: North Carolina
 
Jackdoor wrote:
Agreed, but not cheap, and only down to 50mm equivalent at the wide end. I love the 14mm Panasonic prime as well as the 100-300. If the budget is tight, the bog standard 14-42 IIR and 40-150 are surprisingly good for the price, at least as good as the usual DSLR kit lenses.
Generally very impressed with the 16 megapixel micro 4/3 system.


Thanks for the lens recommendations.

Reply
Mar 24, 2014 07:03:15   #
Chef patty Loc: North Carolina
 
lukan wrote:
The E-P5 is excellent for the money. Couple it with the 25mm, 45mm and 75mm primes and your IQ will leave you wanting for nothing. :thumbup:


Glad to hear you like the camera.

Reply
Mar 24, 2014 07:03:57   #
Chef patty Loc: North Carolina
 
sueyeisert wrote:
I thought E-P5 is very similar to the E-M5. I would not use it for sports or fast moving subject.


Thanks for your advice.

Reply
Mar 24, 2014 09:50:34   #
Jackdoor Loc: Huddersfield, Yorkshire.
 
Chef patty wrote:
Thanks for the lens recommendations.


Thanks and you're welcome. I forgot to say- welcome to Ugly Hedgehog!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.