How can you tell he's awake?
BigDHall wrote:
How can you tell he's awake?
check back tomorrow.
teaser: How come they found debris up to 8 miles away?
papayanirvana wrote:
If you look at the flight path... it seems to have done a near-u-turn and was heading pretty straight to DC.
(the white house is an obvious target).
Look at any of the flight path of flight 77. It wandered all over the place until it flew low over the Pentagon.
RMM wrote:
papayanirvana....very bad....you woke him up!
Is that a sheep I hear b-a-a-a-ing?
papayanirvana wrote:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/Flightpath-AA77.gif
I don't know larry, it looks like it did a Uey after hijack and then 1 course correction a little past half way back.
Other flight paths show more deviation.
Whatever they did, they didn't hit the Pentagon. They flew over it as the missile was approaching. Here's an eyewitness account by Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski:
"It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics. ...
There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile". ...
I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.
The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.
The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon. ..."
http://patriotsquestion911.com/#Kwiatkowski
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.