Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Here's one you may have missed, Larry!
Page <prev 2 of 2
Mar 22, 2014 03:39:16   #
BigDHall Loc: Utah
 
How can you tell he's awake?

Reply
Mar 22, 2014 04:25:16   #
papayanirvana Loc: Kauai
 
BigDHall wrote:
How can you tell he's awake?
check back tomorrow.


teaser: How come they found debris up to 8 miles away?

Reply
Mar 22, 2014 08:13:51   #
larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country
 
papayanirvana wrote:
If you look at the flight path... it seems to have done a near-u-turn and was heading pretty straight to DC.
(the white house is an obvious target).


Look at any of the flight path of flight 77. It wandered all over the place until it flew low over the Pentagon.

Reply
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Mar 22, 2014 08:18:21   #
larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country
 
RMM wrote:
papayanirvana....very bad....you woke him up!




Is that a sheep I hear b-a-a-a-ing?

Reply
Mar 22, 2014 13:02:01   #
papayanirvana Loc: Kauai
 
larrypayne wrote:
Look at any of the flight path of flight 77. It wandered all over the place until it flew low over the Pentagon.


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/Flightpath-AA77.gif

I don't know larry, it looks like it did a Uey after hijack and then 1 course correction a little past half way back.

Reply
Mar 22, 2014 13:59:50   #
larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country
 
papayanirvana wrote:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/Flightpath-AA77.gif

I don't know larry, it looks like it did a Uey after hijack and then 1 course correction a little past half way back.




Other flight paths show more deviation.

Whatever they did, they didn't hit the Pentagon. They flew over it as the missile was approaching. Here's an eyewitness account by Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski:

"It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics. ...

There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile". ...

I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.

The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.

The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon. ..."

http://patriotsquestion911.com/#Kwiatkowski

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.