We get into debates here on the 'hog about where life came from and those who reject God's account like to talk about how Evolution (monkeys to men) is a done-deal...settled science as it were.
Well...someone finally has the courage to say it in public...nobody can explain how life came from non-life.
Furthermore, when they talk about other aspects of the scientific quest for knowledge, they are ruthless in their skepticism, they won't accept shoddy work, but somehow when it comes to Evolution...just about anything goes.
Quote:
Although most scientists leave few stones unturned in their quest to discern mechanisms before wholeheartedly accepting them, when it comes to the often gross extrapolations between observations and conclusions on macroevolution, scientists, it seems to me, permit unhealthy leeway. When hearing such extrapolations in the academy, when will we cry out, The emperor has no clothes!?
I simply do not understand, chemically, how macroevolution could have happened. Hence, am I not free to join the ranks of the skeptical and to sign such a statement without reprisals from those that disagree with me?
Does anyone understand the chemical details behind macroevolution? If so, I would like to sit with that person and be taught, so I invite them to meet with me.
br Although most scientists leave few stones untu... (
show quote)