Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
My Mother's Camera
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Mar 6, 2014 23:36:09   #
PhotoMan1929 Loc: Virginia, USA
 
Way back, in the dim, distant days of 1920, my mother bought a small camera - an Autographic Vest Pocket Kodak. Cost, $6.00 USD. From 1912 until 1926, Eastman Kodak made and sold
1, 750, 000 of these small cameras. Folded up, it measured only 1 x 2.5 x 4.75 inches (25 x 65 x 125 MM), thus it could easily fit a vest or shirt pocket. They were very popular with soldiers in World War One, and thus were often called the "Soldier's Camera."

Fitted with a simple, single element meniscus lens, maximum aperture, f/11 and a shutter with only 1/25, 1/50. T & B, the camera was easy to operate. There were other versions with better quality lenses, one standard model with a Kodak Anastigmat , f/7.7 lens, sold for $12.00 USD. The Vest Pocket was the first Kodak to use Type 127 film. The "Autographic" had a small door in the rear, and a small stylus, which enabled the user to write on the margins of each negative, using a special "Autographic" film. I believe Kodak discontinued that film before I was born. and standard 127 was dropped by Kodak decades ago. The type is still available from foreign sources, but is expensive.

My mother's camera is in perfect mechanical condition, the shutter is fine, works consistently, and the little leather bellows, the most delicate part, is intact, no cracks or holes. The original box is somewhat the worse for wear, but still houses the camera OK.

Ann made the photo below with her little Kodak C663 - from Kodak to Kodak and age to age.

My Mother's Camra
My Mother's Camra...

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 00:01:49   #
chase4 Loc: Punta Corona, California
 
Great bit of history, thanks for sharing.

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 01:08:16   #
photon56 Loc: North America
 
Yes, very nice piece of history. It is always interesting to see what was manufactured at a particular time in history based on available knowledge of the day.

Reply
 
 
Mar 7, 2014 02:08:46   #
RichardQ Loc: Colorado
 
On the German side during the First World War, a somewhat similar "collapsible" camera was made by the Plaubel company. It was called the Makina and was introduced in 1912 as a 4.5 cm x 6 cm format and a Stereo-Makina 4.5 cm x 10.7 cm format, both using only plates (no rollfilm). Like the Kodak model in this posting, the slim pocket-sized camera opened and closed quickly with a folding scissors-strut arrangement, unlike the bulkier "trap-door" cameras which opened with a hinged door on which the lens standard slid out on rails. The Plaubel Makina was equipped with Plaubel's own very respectable lenses. It was redesigned in the 1920s to a 6 cm x 9 cm format and soon equipped for 120 rollfilm (in Germany called "B4" film). The Makina became a favorite of European press photographers and serious amateurs for 40 years, evolving through three models before production of the Makina IIIR was discontinued in 1960. After Plaubel was sold to a Japanese company in 1975, a Japanese 6 cm x 7 cm version with Nikkor lenses was produced and although discontinued in 1986 (due to Mamaya's bankruptcy) it is still favored by medium-format photographers.

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 06:09:12   #
crimesc324 Loc: West Palm Beach, Florida
 
very interesting, thanks for sharing

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 06:40:24   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
PhotoMan1929 wrote:
Way back, in the dim, distant days of 1920, my mother bought a small camera - an Autographic Vest Pocket Kodak. Cost, $6.00 USD. From 1912 until 1926, Eastman Kodak made and sold
1, 750, 000 of these small cameras.

Thanks for that.

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 10:04:59   #
Papa Joe Loc: Midwest U.S.
 
PhotoMan1929 wrote:
Way back, in the dim, distant days of 1920, my mother bought a small camera - an Autographic Vest Pocket Kodak. Cost, $6.00 USD. From 1912 until 1926, Eastman Kodak made and sold
1, 750, 000 of these small cameras. Folded up, it measured only 1 x 2.5 x 4.75 inches (25 x 65 x 125 MM), thus it could easily fit a vest or shirt pocket. They were very popular with soldiers in World War One, and thus were often called the "Soldier's Camera."

Fitted with a simple, single element meniscus lens, maximum aperture, f/11 and a shutter with only 1/25, 1/50. T & B, the camera was easy to operate. There were other versions with better quality lenses, one standard model with a Kodak Anastigmat , f/7.7 lens, sold for $12.00 USD. The Vest Pocket was the first Kodak to use Type 127 film. The "Autographic" had a small door in the rear, and a small stylus, which enabled the user to write on the margins of each negative, using a special "Autographic" film. I believe Kodak discontinued that film before I was born. and standard 127 was dropped by Kodak decades ago. The type is still available from foreign sources, but is expensive.

My mother's camera is in perfect mechanical condition, the shutter is fine, works consistently, and the little leather bellows, the most delicate part, is intact, no cracks or holes. The original box is somewhat the worse for wear, but still houses the camera OK.

Ann made the photo below with her little Kodak C663 - from Kodak to Kodak and age to age.
Way back, in the dim, distant days of 1920, my mot... (show quote)



Very interesting, Photoman & Ann, thanks for posting. I 'grew-up' using 127 film. I had a little 127 that took 'split-frame' photos yielding twice the normal amount of exposures per roll. Each frame was a little smaller than 35mm frame and I enjoyed shooting thousands of photos with that little camera. I would occasionally 'blow them up' in my little darkroom to a whopping 5x7 size! Good memories, thank you!

Reply
 
 
Mar 7, 2014 10:08:29   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
This is the nicest thread I have read here in a long time.

Thanks

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 12:28:16   #
WSHIRKEA Loc: TEMPE, AZ
 
I love exploring camera. History. Thanks for sharing.

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 15:40:27   #
PhotoMan1929 Loc: Virginia, USA
 
chase4 wrote:
Great bit of history, thanks for sharing.


Thanks for the comment. Each of us has a little bit of history to share.

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 15:43:07   #
PhotoMan1929 Loc: Virginia, USA
 
photon56 wrote:
Yes, very nice piece of history. It is always interesting to see what was manufactured at a particular time in history based on available knowledge of the day.


Thank you for the kind comment. Each of us has a little bit of history to relate. So much gets lost.

Reply
 
 
Mar 7, 2014 15:46:46   #
PhotoMan1929 Loc: Virginia, USA
 
RichardQ wrote:
On the German side during the First World War, a somewhat similar "collapsible" camera was made by the Plaubel company. It was called the Makina and was introduced in 1912 as a 4.5 cm x 6 cm format and a Stereo-Makina 4.5 cm x 10.7 cm format, both using only plates (no rollfilm). Like the Kodak model in this posting, the slim pocket-sized camera opened and closed quickly with a folding scissors-strut arrangement, unlike the bulkier "trap-door" cameras which opened with a hinged door on which the lens standard slid out on rails. The Plaubel Makina was equipped with Plaubel's own very respectable lenses. It was redesigned in the 1920s to a 6 cm x 9 cm format and soon equipped for 120 rollfilm (in Germany called "B4" film). The Makina became a favorite of European press photographers and serious amateurs for 40 years, evolving through three models before production of the Makina IIIR was discontinued in 1960. After Plaubel was sold to a Japanese company in 1975, a Japanese 6 cm x 7 cm version with Nikkor lenses was produced and although discontinued in 1986 (due to Mamaya's bankruptcy) it is still favored by medium-format photographers.
On the German side during the First World War, a s... (show quote)


Thanks for your information. I remember the 6 x 9 Plaubel Makina quite well. I recall them on sale, used, in the camera shops when I ws a young man.

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 15:48:06   #
PhotoMan1929 Loc: Virginia, USA
 
crimesc324 wrote:
very interesting, thanks for sharing


Thank you. We all have something to share.

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 15:50:11   #
PhotoMan1929 Loc: Virginia, USA
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Thanks for that.


Thanks, Jerry. I respect your opinions. Are you still snowed in?

Reply
Mar 7, 2014 15:54:23   #
PhotoMan1929 Loc: Virginia, USA
 
Papa Joe wrote:
Very interesting, Photoman & Ann, thanks for posting. I 'grew-up' using 127 film. I had a little 127 that took 'split-frame' photos yielding twice the normal amount of exposures per roll. Each frame was a little smaller than 35mm frame and I enjoyed shooting thousands of photos with that little camera. I would occasionally 'blow them up' in my little darkroom to a whopping 5x7 size! Good memories, thank you!


Thanks for your kind comments. Thanks for the information and thanks for the memories.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.