SOLD
Mar 2, 2014 20:23:33 #
Mar 2, 2014 23:13:04 #
We just had a similar post, of the same (Tamron) lens for sale ealier today. Why wouldnt you post a photo of THE lens you're offering?! I'd like to see an image of the front and rear elements, and the serial #. It'd make your sale easier, and our suspiscions fewer.
Mar 3, 2014 07:32:06 #
authorizeduser wrote:
I have here for sale a Nikon 180mm 2.8 ED IF prime... (show quote)
You seemed to have forgotten to mention about the hair inside the lens that is stuck on the element. Not that it has any effect on the exposure but to just be honest about the sale. After all, you mentioned the hair and was afraid it may be a problem for you in a earlier post. Other people may not like the hair as well.
Mar 3, 2014 11:37:11 #
He also didn't mention that he purchased this lens for $375 in an earlier post.
Mar 4, 2014 00:28:42 #
rocco_7155 wrote:
We just had a similar post, of the same (Tamron) lens for sale ealier today. Why wouldnt you post a photo of THE lens you're offering?! I'd like to see an image of the front and rear elements, and the serial #. It'd make your sale easier, and our suspiscions fewer.
This is a Nikon lens NOT a Tamron lens and just how am I suppose top take a photo when this is my only lens? I can try my cellphone I suppose.
Mar 4, 2014 00:30:01 #
lifenprism wrote:
You seemed to have forgotten to mention about the hair inside the lens that is stuck on the element. Not that it has any effect on the exposure but to just be honest about the sale. After all, you mentioned the hair and was afraid it may be a problem for you in a earlier post. Other people may not like the hair as well.
I took the lens to Midwest Camera repair and they removed the hair. It was on the rear lens and not inside as I thought. Cost me $20.
Mar 4, 2014 00:30:57 #
IsoBob wrote:
He also didn't mention that he purchased this lens for $375 in an earlier post.
What I paid for the lens has no bearing on its worth or what I should sell it for.
Mar 4, 2014 00:41:00 #
rocco_7155 wrote:
We just had a similar post, of the same (Tamron) lens for sale ealier today. Why wouldnt you post a photo of THE lens you're offering?! I'd like to see an image of the front and rear elements, and the serial #. It'd make your sale easier, and our suspiscions fewer.
OK! Took some photos with my cellphone and listed the serial number. And YES I did pay $375 for it and if anyone wants the lens they can have it for $375. I am selling only because this 180mm is a 270mm on my D300. I might as well have a telescope mounted on the D300. Way to much lens. I made a mistake buying it. I need maybe a 35mm, 40mm or 50mm lens.
Mar 4, 2014 17:42:10 #
romanticf16
Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
authorizeduser wrote:
OK! Took some photos with my cellphone and listed the serial number. And YES I did pay $375 for it and if anyone wants the lens they can have it for $375. I am selling only because this 180mm is a 270mm on my D300. I might as well have a telescope mounted on the D300. Way to much lens. I made a mistake buying it. I need maybe a 35mm, 40mm or 50mm lens.
Actually the magnification is still 180, the field of view(wideness may seem like 270). It is a great lens for sports on a D300.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.