Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Two Versions - What's the verdict?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 31, 2011 15:01:18   #
Cadugand Loc: Houston, Texas
 
Sitting here on New Year's eve trying to tune up my skills in a few areas and picking up some of my old photos for subject matter. Picked on this poor hapless waterfall picture as a target...what's your opinion? Does the "enhancement" add anything?

Colorado Waterfall - version 1
Colorado Waterfall - version 1...

Colorado Waterfall - version 2
Colorado Waterfall - version 2...

Reply
Dec 31, 2011 15:06:31   #
tkhphotography Loc: Gresham, Or, not Seattle
 
I like the first one better. Better focusing and more detail

Reply
Dec 31, 2011 15:08:17   #
Cadugand Loc: Houston, Texas
 
tkhphotography wrote:
I like the first one better. Better focusing and more detail


Ya I think you're right on this size screen...when I looked at it on the full screen in looked better...back to the drawing board.

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2011 15:09:10   #
JohnnyT789 Loc: Conyers,Georgia
 
I like 1 also.

Reply
Dec 31, 2011 15:12:02   #
donrent Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl
 
What I don't understand is how some people think they can radically "improve" something that dosen't need anymore than maybe a slight "twiqueing"...

Reply
Dec 31, 2011 15:50:42   #
Cadugand Loc: Houston, Texas
 
donrent wrote:
What I don't understand is how some people think they can radically "improve" something that dosen't need anymore than maybe a slight "twiqueing"...


Thanks...I understand, and I am guilty as charged, but this is a slow afternoon and I downloaded a demo version of Nik's HDR software. I'm using it on a single file here (not multiple shots), and seeing what comes out...never used it before. This might drive you nuts, but here's another effect (there are hundreds, and I won't go further)

HDR effect
HDR effect...

Reply
Dec 31, 2011 17:54:26   #
Bmac Loc: Long Island, NY
 
I would stick with the first, unaltered version.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2012 01:35:22   #
nikron7 Loc: Indianapolis
 
the original is sharper and better.

Reply
Jan 1, 2012 02:12:26   #
Mimi Jane
 
First one gets my vote.

Reply
Jan 1, 2012 02:40:33   #
RMM Loc: Suburban New York
 
I'm with the rest of the crowd. The first version has good exposure and saturation, and doesn't seem to need anything to improve it. If you want to PLAY with it for dramatic effect, try duplicating the image on a new layer and apply a 50 percent opacity using Hard mix mode. But that's with a completely different intent!

Reply
Jan 1, 2012 07:24:21   #
heyjoe Loc: cincinnati ohio
 
First,i am about to try this HDR thing today

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2012 07:26:31   #
Al FR-153 Loc: Chicago Suburbs
 
Stick with #1.

Reply
Jan 1, 2012 07:34:19   #
ckcougar Loc: NATIVE FLORIDIAN
 
I feel like a sheep.... #1 by all means.

Reply
Jan 1, 2012 10:29:13   #
Cadugand Loc: Houston, Texas
 
Ok I did try a number of edits on this picture using Nik and Topaz plug-ins. It probably wasn't the best choice for some of the tests but it did teach me something about these packages. Thanks you all for your thoughts. It helps to bounce things around. By the way, you can download trial versions of this software and they do some pretty neat things.

Reply
Jan 1, 2012 10:30:31   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
Cadugand wrote:
Sitting here on New Year's eve trying to tune up my skills in a few areas and picking up some of my old photos for subject matter. Picked on this poor hapless waterfall picture as a target...what's your opinion? Does the "enhancement" add anything?


no

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.