Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
camera lens vs. binoculars
Feb 13, 2014 22:57:48   #
olcoach Loc: Oregon
 
Binoculars and rifle scopes have a gas in them that prevents them from fogging up. Camera lenses apparently don't have it and must not need it. Is this true or don't the binocs and scopes have gas anymore either. I am asking as I have a lens that has some mold on the lens and I am going to see if I can take the lens apart and clean it. It is an inexpensive lens.

Reply
Feb 13, 2014 23:36:51   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
olcoach wrote:
Binoculars and rifle scopes have a gas in them that prevents them from fogging up. Camera lenses apparently don't have it and must not need it. Is this true or don't the binocs and scopes have gas anymore either. I am asking as I have a lens that has some mold on the lens and I am going to see if I can take the lens apart and clean it. It is an inexpensive lens.

The better binoculars are filled with nitrogen or argon gas to prevent fogging. I would guess that camera lenses are not because the focusing system would create expansion and contraction. Binoculars can have the focusing mechanisms independent and separate chambers dilled with gas. Some lenses, called duplex lenses because of multi-chamber construction might be amenable to the use of gas, but the space between the chambers would have to be tightly built or perhaps evacuated.

Reply
Feb 14, 2014 06:03:12   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Mogul wrote:
The better binoculars are filled with nitrogen or argon gas to prevent fogging. I would guess that camera lenses are not because the focusing system would create expansion and contraction. Binoculars can have the focusing mechanisms independent and separate chambers dilled with gas. Some lenses, called duplex lenses because of multi-chamber construction might be amenable to the use of gas, but the space between the chambers would have to be tightly built or perhaps evacuated.

Isn't one advantage of nitrogen that it doesn't expand like air? That was a big promotional point for filling your tires with nitrogen a while back.

Lenses aren't airtight, so the nitrogen wouldn't last long - zoom lenses, anyway.

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2014 07:32:40   #
DaveMM Loc: Port Elizabeth, South Africa
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Isn't one advantage of nitrogen that it doesn't expand like air? That was a big promotional point for filling your tires with nitrogen a while back.
One of many myths about nitrogen.

http://powertank.com/truth.or.hype/

Reply
Feb 14, 2014 08:04:31   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
DaveMM wrote:
One of many myths about nitrogen.

http://powertank.com/truth.or.hype/

That's probably why I no longer see it advertised at tire stores.

Reply
Feb 14, 2014 14:30:54   #
stan0301 Loc: Colorado
 
The air is already 80% nitrogen--but the other 20% is mostly oxygen which over time will react with most anything--I doubt you would own a tire long enough to make any difference--as the "outsides of the tire will be exposed to oxygen all the time it would matter very little
Stan

Reply
Feb 14, 2014 22:47:10   #
olcoach Loc: Oregon
 
Thanks all for your answers. I can experiment with cleaning my lens without fear of something getting out I couldn't put back in. I have never had a lens fog up and we have some cold here. I wonder why? Thanks again.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.