Another attack on religion ... Valentine's Day (Page 8): here, here! :thumbup:...

Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas

bvm wrote:

Typical democRAT, blame everyone else for everything else.

You guys always live in the past to explain you stupid acts of today.

BO promised you the world, you got nothing.

Then of course you pull the racist crap.

The very second you say "racist" the world knows your argument is bogus!

You ARE a bitter jerk that needs counseling.

here, here! :thumbup:

Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas

dirtpusher wrote:

if i remember correctly, republicans led us in to all this mess. going take years and years to clean up. and this is mild compared to what else republicans have and are still pushing us into. put blame where it belongs is right. only war we should have been involved in is afghanistan.

Republican president, democrat congress that backed him completely....so lets put the blame where it belongs....to EVERYONE that was in that particular administration....yes, EVEN THE DEMOCRATS

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

Penny MG wrote:

sad reply....

And guys like izzyandal invented Oblame-O !

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

KW Conch wrote:

I'm not worried about it. I pay what I owe without complaining.

Yes, we did pay OUR fair share, But now YOUR BO want's more.

I think we'll be next!

KW Conch Loc: USA

bvm wrote:

Yes, we did pay OUR fair share, But now YOUR BO want's more.

I think we'll be next!

If memory serves me right, Obama signed the Bush tax cuts into law on a permanent basis. What do you mean that he wants more ?
By the way, the Bush tax cuts were supposed to allow the "job creators" to hire more workers. They have sat on their money and done nothing about hiring. The recession started under Bush, so don't try to blame the ACA.

KW Conch Loc: USA

Penny MG wrote:

Republican president, democrat congress that backed him completely....so lets put the blame where it belongs....to EVERYONE that was in that particular administration....yes, EVEN THE DEMOCRATS

Their support of Bush was based on a mountain of lies that were believed by the Democrats. Even Colin Powell said that he is embarrassed about the lies he was handed by the Bush administration to present to the UN.

KW Conch Loc: USA

Penny MG wrote:

Conch...that is not right, because not all conservatives are racist as this guy obviously is.

Penny, I hope you are right. Unfortunately, I have seen a lot of this stuff from conservatives. That's one of the reasons that I oppose them.

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

KW Conch wrote:

If memory serves me right, Obama signed the Bush tax cuts into law on a permanent basis. What do you mean that he wants more ?
By the way, the Bush tax cuts were supposed to allow the "job creators" to hire more workers. They have sat on their money and done nothing about hiring. The recession started under Bush, so don't try to blame the ACA.

AND BO multiplied it drastically!

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

KW Conch wrote:

Penny, I hope you are right. Unfortunately, I have seen a lot of this stuff from conservatives. That's one of the reasons that I oppose them.

What about the crap and lies we hear from liberals?

You've been in for 5years, senate 7. Like Barney Franks said, the housing industry is safe, Fannie and Freddie are ok.

Admit it, the dems screwed up and Bush warned all you blind democRATs !

BO is in, he promised he'd fix it, he didn't, it's now all his fault.

Kind of like Johnson's Viet Nam war.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

still think bummer has a ways to go to match what these 2 have done to this country.

to what they did is inexcusable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T74VA3xU0EA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12RJo

KW Conch Loc: USA

bvm wrote:

AND BO multiplied it drastically!

From what I see the unemployment rate has fallen in the last few years, despite the Republicans attempts to block every move Obama tries to improve the situation. Such as the bill that Obama attempted to pass to provide returning veterans with training for existing open jobs. Republicans shot it down. No surprise, it didn't contain more tax cuts for the rich.

KW Conch Loc: USA

bvm wrote:

What about the crap and lies we hear from liberals?

You've been in for 5years, senate 7. Like Barney Franks said, the housing industry is safe, Fannie and Freddie are ok.

Admit it, the dems screwed up and Bush warned all you blind democRATs !

BO is in, he promised he'd fix it, he didn't, it's now all his fault.

Kind of like Johnson's Viet Nam war.

This mess started on Bush's watch. Why did he sign the bill if he didn't like it ?
I'm not a Democrat, I'm a registered Independent and I do vote for sane Republicans. I voted for Reagan twice and I voted for Bush in 2000, but not 2004. I would NEVER vote for a Tea Party candidate.
I do blame Johnson for escalating the Viet Nam war. I do thank Johnson for Medicare.
Can the Republicans do anything wrong in your eyes ?

KW Conch Loc: USA

dirtpusher wrote:

still think bummer has a ways to go to match what these 2 have done to this country.

to what they did is inexcusable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T74VA3xU0EA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12RJo

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

KW Conch wrote:

From what I see the unemployment rate has fallen in the last few years, despite the Republicans attempts to block every move Obama tries to improve the situation. Such as the bill that Obama attempted to pass to provide returning veterans with training for existing open jobs. Republicans shot it down. No surprise, it didn't contain more tax cuts for the rich.

________________________________________________

Here's a good example of democRAT and Oblame-O logic.
there are 100 people
10 people are collecting unemployed = 10% unemployment

7 people are collecting unemployment = 7% unemployment
3 people are unemployed but are NOT collecting unemployment

NOW
5 people are collecting unemployment = 5% unemployment
5 people are unemployed but are NOT collecting unemployment

Then
3 people are collecting unemployment = 3% unemployment
7 people are unemployed and are NOT collecting unemployment

Then
0 people are collecting unemployment = O% unemployment
10 people are unemployed and NONE are collecting unemployment.

The criteria is that you must be collecting unemployment to be CONSIDERED unemployed.

TO
All you democRATs, why don't you tell those 10 people that they are not UNEMPLOYED!

It started with Clinton, Bush perpetuated it, and Oblame-O keeps it up.

So like Pelosi, Jay, Schumer and Ellis say Now, you have time to do what ever you want. Be an artist, take up cooking, take up ballet or learn to play an instrument .

You want a job?

What are you crazy?

Vote for us dems, we'll take care of you and YOU will owe us!

KW Conch Loc: USA

bvm wrote:

________________________________________________ b... (show quote)

Amazing amount of twisting logic. Unemployment figures come from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They are released from the same place regardless of the party of the President. I don't think that either one of us would be living in luxury on welfare. By the way, I think that welfare should only be available for a short period of time. The problem is that we are still working our way out of the Bush recession and the " job creators" are not creating jobs, even though they were given tax cuts for that reason. Also, corporations are sitting on mountains of cash and won't hire because technology allows them to get the same amount of work from fewer employees. It would be the same regardless of who the president happened to be.