Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Opteka GH1 Pro Heavy Duty Metal Gimbal Head
Feb 2, 2014 12:18:31   #
Old Timer Loc: Greenfield, In.
 
This question is mainly to MT. Shooter.
I would like your opinion or experience if any with this product. I will not be using it a lot or with big lens probably 300L lens and and a 1.4III. It is rated at 30 lbs and that should be sufficient for my needs even if I cut that in half.

Reply
Feb 2, 2014 14:09:20   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
Old Timer wrote:
This question is mainly to MT. Shooter.
I would like your opinion or experience if any with this product. I will not be using it a lot or with big lens probably 300L lens and and a 1.4III. It is rated at 30 lbs and that should be sufficient for my needs even if I cut that in half.


"Ratings" mean nothing as there is no accepted standard to compare them by. The Opteka GH1 is a re-badged Beike BK-45 head with no changes at all other than the name plate. The Beike original is rated at 15 pounds which I have found to be extremely liberal. I like the Beike/Opteka for the 150-500mm Sigma lenses at it works quite well with them, but heavier lenses over-tax its capability and will allow the head to quiver in the wind, especially if the tripod itself is not up to the task. I would rate both as honest 12 pound heads, and nothing more than that. (That's a 6 pound safe load rating)
The Beike original is available for $30-$40 less than the re-badged Opteka and for this reason I never recommend anyone buying the Opteka name as it gives you nothing at all for the price increase.
I do have 2 of the Beikes in my rental inventory mounted on Bogen/Manfrotto 3246 tripods and they are very good within that load range. For heavier lenses I rent the Wimberley WH-200. I am currently working with Nest in developing a 26 pound rated Carbon Fiber Gimbal head (weighing under 3 pounds) with a list price of $299 and a street price of about $265, but it won't be available in the USA directly until May or June of 2014. So far my field testing is extremely favorable and I have shot the Sigma 800mm F5.6 on it with excellent results. Right now it has a proprietary ARCA QR system on it but the factory is making me a fully ARCA compatible model expected to arrive in early March. I will be a stocking dealer for both models when sales stocks become available and will be using them alongside the Wimberleys in my rental inventory.
So, if your 300mm L lens is the F2.8, I would not use the Opteka. If its the F4 model, the Opteka should handle it well. In the end its entirely your choice to make. Good luck.

Reply
Feb 2, 2014 14:44:24   #
Old Timer Loc: Greenfield, In.
 
Thanks for the info and reply. I have the 300 f/4 so that should not be a problem.

MT Shooter wrote:
"Ratings" mean nothing as there is no accepted standard to compare them by. The Opteka GH1 is a re-badged Beike BK-45 head with no changes at all other than the name plate. The Beike original is rated at 15 pounds which I have found to be extremely liberal. I like the Beike/Opteka for the 150-500mm Sigma lenses at it works quite well with them, but heavier lenses over-tax its capability and will allow the head to quiver in the wind, especially if the tripod itself is not up to the task. I would rate both as honest 12 pound heads, and nothing more than that. (That's a 6 pound safe load rating)
The Beike original is available for $30-$40 less than the re-badged Opteka and for this reason I never recommend anyone buying the Opteka name as it gives you nothing at all for the price increase.
I do have 2 of the Beikes in my rental inventory mounted on Bogen/Manfrotto 3246 tripods and they are very good within that load range. For heavier lenses I rent the Wimberley WH-200. I am currently working with Nest in developing a 26 pound rated Carbon Fiber Gimbal head (weighing under 3 pounds) with a list price of $299 and a street price of about $265, but it won't be available in the USA directly until May or June of 2014. So far my field testing is extremely favorable and I have shot the Sigma 800mm F5.6 on it with excellent results. Right now it has a proprietary ARCA QR system on it but the factory is making me a fully ARCA compatible model expected to arrive in early March. I will be a stocking dealer for both models when sales stocks become available and will be using them alongside the Wimberleys in my rental inventory.
So, if your 300mm L lens is the F2.8, I would not use the Opteka. If its the F4 model, the Opteka should handle it well. In the end its entirely your choice to make. Good luck.
"Ratings" mean nothing as there is no ac... (show quote)

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.