Too Many Cars To List (5)
Jan 26, 2014 15:48:13 #
Walking wasn't the most fun I had with all the cars there.
Sarge69
Sarge69
Hopefully painting is next
(Download)
Chevies were popular
(Download)
Another row
(Download)
Chevy Beauties
(Download)
I'd take it home
(Download)
Real Wood too
(Download)
Jan 26, 2014 17:40:59 #
Beowulf
Loc: Aquidneck Island, RI
Nice series, Sarge. Really loved the 56 and 57 Chevies, and in this group the 42 Ford woody is the standout.
Jan 26, 2014 22:45:53 #
Jan 27, 2014 00:54:50 #
alawry
Loc: Timaru New Zealand
You Think so? View the maroon coupe full size, check out the reflections in the body. That is soooo straight. A great panel job, you'll never see one as smooth as that.
Beowulf wrote:
Nice series, Sarge. Really loved the 56 and 57 Chevies, and in this group the 42 Ford woody is the standout.
Jan 27, 2014 09:46:49 #
Always luv all car show pics - thanks for sharing; and thanks for your 30 YRs Army service sir!
Jan 27, 2014 10:05:57 #
sammywoody wrote:
Always luv all car show pics - thanks for sharing; and thanks for your 30 YRs Army service sir!
Your welcome and thanks very much.
Sarge69
Jan 27, 2014 19:23:07 #
Jan 28, 2014 09:45:02 #
alby wrote:
nice pics sarge. love the pickup. did you use your p510?
I had it in my backpack but all these photos were with the Nikon D7000 and the 55-300 lens. Settings were manual at ISO 400 / Apeture 6.7 / Shutter 750th all hand held.
Sarge69
Jan 30, 2014 04:57:32 #
alawry
Loc: Timaru New Zealand
sarge69 wrote:
I had it in my backpack but all these photos were with the Nikon D7000 and the 55-300 lens. Settings were manual at ISO 400 / Apeture 6.7 / Shutter 750th all hand held.
Sarge69
Sarge69
HI Thanks for this information. Can you tell me why you used a "longer" lens? For these subjects I would have thought a wider lens (18-55 range) would mean I could work closer to the subject. If I had to guess it will be to get a better perspective maybe? less distortion of the vehicle shape? I really wanting to learn to do better myself. Thanks for a great series, Andrew.
Jan 30, 2014 06:53:06 #
alawry wrote:
HI Thanks for this information. Can you tell me why you used a "longer" lens? For these subjects I would have thought a wider lens (18-55 range) would mean I could work closer to the subject. If I had to guess it will be to get a better perspective maybe? less distortion of the vehicle shape? I really wanting to learn to do better myself. Thanks for a great series, Andrew.
Lazy, many times I wanted to get a shot from a distance because it seemed like every time I got close, people would be in the photo all the time. So I could get some shots from a distance when the zoom would get me in.
Sarge69
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.