For you Hillary supporters. Part for the course
Jan 17, 2014 10:13:31 #
There are some patterns of behavior and ethical standards (or as in this example, lack of them) that are formed in early childhood development. They do not go away as you get older. They may run under the radar for awhile but the underlying flaws remain only to surface again from time to time. It is most certainly relevant to be reminded of these failings.
Jan 17, 2014 10:15:10 #
dbmaxwell
Loc: Mogadore, Ohio
Gee, a typo and you come unglued and get insulting. Never made a mistake, eh? I have noticed the folks that attack a person when they do not have a case against the message is the liberals. How is that for a stereotype? How about liberals care more about the spotted owl than the kids of the loggers? Another stereotype. Neither stereotype is completely true, right along with your stereotype. I know, you will just throw a mental insult my way but your statement is a part of why this world is getting more hostile. Someone has to stand against the bullies in this world.
WNC Ralf wrote:
Part for the course? Where did you go to school ? The saying goes PAR for the course. I have noticed most right wingers, especially t-potties, are not very good at spelling and comprehension.
Jan 17, 2014 10:16:01 #
If you're going to correct someone's spelling, idiom, punctuation or grammar, it's best to examine your own first. I believe you meant to write:
You idiot. The term is "par for the course." It's a reference to golf, meaning "average."
You idiot. The term is "par for the course." It's a reference to golf, meaning "average."
gasmandon wrote:
You idiot, the term is "par for the course" it's a reference to golf meaning average.
Jan 17, 2014 10:16:34 #
WNC Ralf wrote:
Part for the course? Where did you go to school ? The saying goes PAR for the course. I have noticed most right wingers, especially t-potties, are not very good at spelling and comprehension.
Now that's funny!!! If you can't debate the issue you try to discredit the person with spelling and miss quoting a phrase! Very typical liberalÂ….
Jan 17, 2014 10:19:33 #
dbmaxwell
Loc: Mogadore, Ohio
Same as what I said to WNC above, except to add you are more of a bully. Push any little old ladies off the curb today? Take a kids lunch money this am? Feel better about insulin someone for a typo? I will bet you noted that you were a better person than the OP because you didn't make the error.
gasmandon wrote:
You idiot, the term is "par for the course" it's a reference to golf meaning average.
Jan 17, 2014 10:32:44 #
WNC Ralf wrote:
This from one of your posts a few days ago:Part for the course? Where did you go to school ? The saying goes PAR for the course. I have noticed most right wingers, especially t-potties, are not very good at spelling and comprehension.
"Agree totally what you need to learn is you cannot argue with the ignorant, they believe all the lies they have heard and are to ignorant to change."
Where did you go to school? It should be "too ignorant", not "to ignorant". To paraphrase your comment, I have noticed most left wingers, especially ultra liberals, are not very good at spelling and comprehension.
And yes, I specifically went looking for something to harass you with. You're welcome.
When I posted the above I stopped looking at that time but figured if I kept going I would be able to find something else. And sure enough, further investigation resulted in this gem:
"Did not read all the posts so this may have been posted, if you convert to B&W then you are loosing a lot of info you could use in the conversion."
I'm sure you meant to say "losing". I'm also sure if you investigated my postings you will find something there. If you are going to hammer somebody, maybe you should be sure you are hammer-free yourself.
Jan 17, 2014 10:35:50 #
dbmaxwell
Loc: Mogadore, Ohio
A gentleman named Hatfield wrote a book, Fortunate Son, that said that Bush got caught for cocaine in 1972. All the left believes it as whole cloth, absolute truth. No axe to grind and it keeps coming up.
A person writes a book that says Hillary was removed from Watergate for malfeasance and it has no bearing.
So, to sum it up, as I understand it. Something that was done before Watergate by a person that WAS the president has more validity than something that a person did afterwards, by a person that will probably run for president? Now is where you say you don't have your own axe to grind. Really.
A person writes a book that says Hillary was removed from Watergate for malfeasance and it has no bearing.
So, to sum it up, as I understand it. Something that was done before Watergate by a person that WAS the president has more validity than something that a person did afterwards, by a person that will probably run for president? Now is where you say you don't have your own axe to grind. Really.
DEBJENROB wrote:
That is a battle that has long past .... stop livi... (show quote)
Jan 17, 2014 11:17:41 #
bvm
Loc: Glendale, Arizona
Schwabo wrote:
How about Debbie Wasserman Schulze?
Now that's putting lipstick on a pit bull.
Jan 17, 2014 11:17:58 #
silver
Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
bcheary wrote:
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/c/clinton-watergate.htm
Wheres the proof? Truth or fiction in the title describes it all. More nonsense.
Jan 17, 2014 11:43:21 #
Thanks for the link bcheary, I can always count on you for my morning humor. As for the truth, I'll go elsewhere for that.
Jan 17, 2014 11:45:35 #
WNC Ralf
Loc: Candler NC, in the mountains!
dbmaxwell wrote:
Gee, a typo and you come unglued and get insulting... (show quote)
No just pointing out the ignorance of the right wingers, there is no sense in arguing with people who have little or no understanding of facts. Reflublicans appoint people to the science committee who do not believe in evolution! What does that tell you. So I have given up discussing pretty much anything with people like you!
Jan 17, 2014 11:47:53 #
DEBJENROB wrote:
That is a battle that has long past .... stop livi... (show quote)
The past has a habit of returning to bite people in the butt. If I can help burn a liberal, I will do my best. You liberals seem hell bent on running Hillary and I am hell bent on stopping her or any other candidate that you liberals put forward. :-D
Jan 17, 2014 11:49:32 #
creature of habit wrote:
This country has a problem, a very serious problem. It is not just individual politicians, it's the Democrats vs. Republicans way of life that is destroying the USA. This "must win" attitude is not good for the country. It's about time both sides come to the table and start working together for the people that put you in office! I, for one, am disgusted with the antics that are going on. Here's and idea... maybe all of them should be thrown out of office and start fresh!!
Term limits won't happen as long as you have more takers than makers. :hunf:
Jan 17, 2014 11:50:08 #
oldgabby wrote:
yup. However, some ............hmmm showed up and re-elected obbummmer. Can't fix stupid.
:lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jan 17, 2014 11:51:07 #
FrumCA wrote:
There are some patterns of behavior and ethical standards (or as in this example, lack of them) that are formed in early childhood development. They do not go away as you get older. They may run under the radar for awhile but the underlying flaws remain only to surface again from time to time. It is most certainly relevant to be reminded of these failings.
:thumbup: :thumbup:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.