Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Critique Section
Snow tracks
Jan 10, 2014 17:54:16   #
RMM Loc: Suburban New York
 
Recently, I arrived at a client's house to find her shooting close-up pictures of the snow. Later, she showed me some very nice shots of frost on the window. When I went out today, we had had a little snow and the birds had been walking around on my car, using it as a staging area while waiting to get to the bird feeders, or as an impromptu picnic spot. I took a few (badly exposed) pictures, which, if nothing else, tells me how much more work I need to put into shooting in snow.

This was over the pachysandra (which I even spelled correctly all on my own! :) ). Quite a few adjustments were made to it. Cropped quite a bit out of this shot. Upped the exposure, boosted the clarity, created luminosity masks and corresponding levels layers and tweaked the brighter areas, and sharpened the result.

Comments/critiques? Improvements? Bad idea in the first place?



Reply
Jan 10, 2014 18:05:21   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
I am a little blurry headed today, but I think you need more contrast to bring out the tracks. You could also achieve this in-camera by shooting at an angle to the tracks to emphasize the shadows within. Neat idea.

Reply
Jan 10, 2014 18:07:00   #
jrb1213 Loc: McDonough GEorgia
 
There are books on tracks, but none like this. This was a great idea. You should give up your day job. I actually like it. Now for the hard part. Which bird species?

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2014 18:20:43   #
RMM Loc: Suburban New York
 
jrb1213 wrote:
There are books on tracks, but none like this. This was a great idea. You should give up your day job. I actually like it. Now for the hard part. Which bird species?

Take your pick! Chickadees, titmice, juncos, cardinals. The first two are the most likely.

Here's another, not quite as drastically treated. These tracks were on the ground next to the path.



Reply
Jan 10, 2014 18:21:45   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
RMM wrote:
Take your pick! Chickadees, titmice, juncos, cardinals. The first two are the most likely.

Here's another, not quite as drastically treated. These tracks were on the ground next to the path.

Much more obvious.

Reply
Jan 10, 2014 18:23:07   #
RMM Loc: Suburban New York
 
St3v3M wrote:
I am a little blurry headed today, but I think you need more contrast to bring out the tracks. You could also achieve this in-camera by shooting at an angle to the tracks to emphasize the shadows within. Neat idea.

Thanks for the suggestions. Hope your head deblurs.

Taken in haste, I was on my way to the pharmacy to pick up prescriptions and then on to a client.

Reply
Jan 10, 2014 18:24:36   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
RMM wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions. Hope your head deblurs.

Taken in haste, I was on my way to the pharmacy to pick up prescriptions and then on to a client.

Some of the most interesting images are found when we are not looking for them! Cheers.

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2014 18:35:15   #
RMM Loc: Suburban New York
 
St3v3M wrote:
Some of the most interesting images are found when we are not looking for them! Cheers.

And then there are pictures within pictures. I didn't crop a lot out of the second photo, but I think it's a lot more interesting this way. And there are other instances where the same photo yield two or three good images depending on how the original was treated.

Reply
Jan 10, 2014 18:36:32   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
RMM wrote:
And then there are pictures within pictures. I didn't crop a lot out of the second photo, but I think it's a lot more interesting this way. And there are other instances where the same photo yield two or three good images depending on how the original was treated.

Finding a photo within a photo is like finding money in your pocket you forgot about. Always brings a smile!

Reply
Jan 10, 2014 19:36:29   #
jrb1213 Loc: McDonough GEorgia
 
I actually did not critique it as I should have. The first one has too many leading lines, the second image is much better as a minimalist photo. It also shows the transitory nature of a life with the snow beginning to melt.

Reply
Jan 10, 2014 19:44:42   #
RMM Loc: Suburban New York
 
jrb1213 wrote:
I actually did not critique it as I should have. The first one has too many leading lines, the second image is much better as a minimalist photo. It also shows the transitory nature of a life with the snow beginning to melt.

Blame the birds for all those leading lines. :)

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2014 10:11:59   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
An interesting shot that reminds us that there's a world right under our noses that we should notice now and then.

I think the effect would work better if it was cleaner - not necessarily less prints, just less of anything that isn't snow or prints.

Reply
Jan 11, 2014 11:26:16   #
RMM Loc: Suburban New York
 
I will discuss this with the birds. Most of them are neat, but a few of them scatter seeds, poop anywhere they want, even throw the odd feather around.

OK, thanks for looking. :)

Reply
Jan 11, 2014 13:01:29   #
Nosaj Loc: Sarasota, Florida
 
Answer to your last question is, "yes."

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Critique Section
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.