D700 vs. 6D
I was asked by a UHH'r what the image quality difference was between the Nikon D700 and the Canon 6D. I was stumped as this was a comparison I had not made. So I grabbed both and using comparable lenses (Nikkor 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VR and Canon 70-300mm F4-5.6L IS USM), I proceeded to take one shot each of the stained glass window in the church across the street from the store. Both cameras were shot in "P" mode with AUTO WB on and the lenses at full zoom of 300mm. Shots were handheld and stabilization was turned on.
The very first thing I noticed was the difference in the auto white balance as you will see below. (The red bias of the Canon sensor is very evident) The image size is different due to the difference in sensor sizes, but the Nikon seems to have slightly more zoom than the Canon at 300mm. Image quality appears quite comparable when you zoom in to the leaded glass on the window, both images pixelate at about the same magnification. I would think you would end up with one size larger print from the Canon than the Nikon just due to the sensor differences.
I am not making this unscientific comparison to judge which camera is better, merely to answer the question posed to me as I had both bodies available and comparable lenses to test them with. Download and view for yourself if you wish.
Nikon D700
Canon 6D
I look at the exif on both pics and nothing is the same....WB is auto on one and manual on the other. ISO is 100 and 400.
Everything else is also totally different.
You sure you posted the right 2 pictures you wanted to post?
TucsonCoyote wrote:
I look at the exif on both pics and nothing is the same....WB is auto on one and manual on the other. ISO is 100 and 400.
Everything else is also totally different.
You sure you posted the right 2 pictures you wanted to post?
That is a difference in the cameras, WB on both bodies were set to auto at the time the shots were taken.
Hate to say it canon boys...the nikon looks better, more natural.
[quote=MT Shooter]That is a difference in the cameras, WB on both bodies were set to auto at the time the shots were taken.[/quOTE
Sure am glad i didn't buy a canon!!
Cdouthitt wrote:
Hate to say it canon boys...the nikon looks better, more natural.
WELL, I BOUGHT THE 6D BECAUSE I HAVE GREAT CANON GLASS......... WOULDN'T TRADE THAT FOR ANYTHING!
You were testing the difference in the auto then? If not, then why not just use manual and identical settings? Not trying to challenge anything, just want to know.
bonneyda wrote:
WELL, I BOUGHT THE 6D BECAUSE I HAVE GREAT CANON GLASS......... WOULDN'T TRADE THAT FOR ANYTHING!
I didn't quite hear that through all the caps locks. Tap the button again to turn it off, in case you didn't know that. Glad your system works for you.
I was comparing the two images submitted...that's all.
bonneyda wrote:
WELL, I BOUGHT THE 6D BECAUSE I HAVE GREAT CANON GLASS......... WOULDN'T TRADE THAT FOR ANYTHING!
Oh, and seeing that this was your first post...WELCOME!
I was just asked to do the same comparison using the Canon 7D and the Nikon D7000. Since I do have both, as well as a pair of 70-200mm lenses, I will do them tomorrow if we have another sunny day. Same settings, "P" mode, AUTO WB and 200mm on the lenses. I wonder if the Canon red bias will be as noticeable in the crop sensors as the full frames?
I may also do a repeat of today with full manual settings on the full frames, if anyone would be interested in the comparison (this would have to be done from a tripod of course). I could also add the D800E to the mix in case someone thinks the D700 is "too old" for an effective sampling.
dsmeltz wrote:
You were testing the difference in the auto then? If not, then why not just use manual and identical settings? Not trying to challenge anything, just want to know.
No, as these cameras do not have an AUTO mode in them. I only selected AUTO WB to simplify the comparison.
MT Shooter wrote:
No, as these cameras do not have an AUTO mode in them. I only selected AUTO WB to simplify the comparison.
Sorry. Thought the WB was auto, which seemed to account for the largest difference in the shots.
I would be interested in seeing the full manual.
dsmeltz wrote:
You were testing the difference in the auto then? If not, then why not just use manual and identical settings? Not trying to challenge anything, just want to know.
Maybe MT Shooter is overstocked on Nikons ? !
....or just wanted to start another fight ? !
TucsonCoyote wrote:
Maybe MT Shooter is overstocked on Nikons ? !
....or just wanted to start another fight ? !
i trust mt to crank out a fair if not pure comparison. who knows we might learn something if he doesn't mind making the effort.
oldtigger wrote:
i trust mt to crank out a fair if not pure comparison. who knows we might learn something if he doesn't mind making the effort.
I don't mind the effort at all really.
That church window is likely one of the most photographed objects in the state of Montana over the last few months. I use it all the time for my customers to shoot when making camera or lens comparisons at my store. I often use it myself for testing cameras or lenses brought in for trading, just because I am familiar with the colors and its great to be able to zoom in on the details on the stores laptop for a quick check of sharpness and focus. I will play some more tomorrow and post some comparisons, who knows what I might dig out of inventory to compare.
And I do have a lot more Nikons than Canons in stock, since they outsell the Canons by at least a 15 (or more) to 1 margin here.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.