As many of you know, I got some lights for Christmas. I am a complete neophyte when comes to using indoor lighting so I thought I'd do some experimentation this evening. These three photos were unmodified and are jpegs straight out of the camera. They differ because of the position and intensity of the lights I used. I had two umbrellas, one spot and a speedlight that I moved around and bounced off the ceiling. It mad quite a difference in the outcome of the shots. I believe I also manually changed the setting of the aperture and shutter speed. To me, however, that is also light manipulation. Thought it was interesting.
AJE
Loc: California
Nice, I like the third photo.
I think that one is the best of the bunch also. But, like I said, I was mainly just trying to figure out how the lights affect the pictures. I have a lot to learn. Thanks for taking a look.
ebrunner wrote:
As many of you know, I got some lights for Christmas. I am a complete neophyte when comes to using indoor lighting so I thought I'd do some experimentation this evening. These three photos were unmodified and are jpegs straight out of the camera. They differ because of the position and intensity of the lights I used. I had two umbrellas, one spot and a speedlight that I moved around and bounced off the ceiling. It mad quite a difference in the outcome of the shots. I believe I also manually changed the setting of the aperture and shutter speed. To me, however, that is also light manipulation. Thought it was interesting.
As many of you know, I got some lights for Christm... (
show quote)
I like 1 and 3 best. Very nice.
Elliern wrote:
I like 1 and 3 best. Very nice.
I also like 1 and 3 the best. The second one looks a little dark.
Heirloom Tomato wrote:
I also like 1 and 3 the best. The second one looks a little dark.
Thanks for taking a look. I was just trying different things to see what it would look like. I know so little about indoor photography that I have to try things and then see how they look.
edgorm wrote:
I like the first one.
That first one is interesting in that I put the speedlight behind the subject. Gives and interesting effect. Thanks.
Excellent! Like them all but #3 the best.
Very interesting series and info. You are having a good time with your Christmas presents :thumbup: :thumbup:
Great Christmas present and you seem to getting results already.Good shot shots.
Like 3 the best, but all are good. Now for a person (or doll) to practice on. Keep up the good work.
ebrunner wrote:
As many of you know, I got some lights for Christmas. I am a complete neophyte when comes to using indoor lighting so I thought I'd do some experimentation this evening. These three photos were unmodified and are jpegs straight out of the camera. They differ because of the position and intensity of the lights I used. I had two umbrellas, one spot and a speedlight that I moved around and bounced off the ceiling. It mad quite a difference in the outcome of the shots. I believe I also manually changed the setting of the aperture and shutter speed. To me, however, that is also light manipulation. Thought it was interesting.
As many of you know, I got some lights for Christm... (
show quote)
It is just like you said and not just for you. Changing the shutter speed will alter the ambient light, while a change in aperture will effect the amount of flash hitting the sensor (+/-).
I like #1 a bit better than the other two.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.