Canon SX50 HS aperture settings
Dec 30, 2013 10:48:26 #
I see various topics about setting the aperture for various shots. I'm fairly new to the camera (six months) and was curious as to the extent my camera would go. I could only find manual settings for the aperture from f 3.4 to f 8.0
Isn't that kind of limiting, or is that normal for this caliber of camera?
Thanks!
Isn't that kind of limiting, or is that normal for this caliber of camera?
Thanks!
Dec 30, 2013 10:55:24 #
Mr_Mel wrote:
I see various topics about setting the aperture for various shots. I'm fairly new to the camera (six months) and was curious as to the extent my camera would go. I could only find manual settings for the aperture from f 3.4 to f 8.0
Isn't that kind of limiting, or is that normal for this caliber of camera?
Thanks!
Isn't that kind of limiting, or is that normal for this caliber of camera?
Thanks!
That is fairly normal for the smaller sensor cameras. Some open up to f/2.8 but F/8.0 is generally the smallest, but it does give DOF closer to f/16 or f/22 on a full frame camera.
Dec 30, 2013 10:57:36 #
How do you like that Canon SX50? I have heard different comments about it. Would not mind having it as a second camera.
Dec 30, 2013 11:40:00 #
Yes, f/8 is the smallest aperture. The specs are at the end of the user manual. It's on the DVD that came with the camera and also online below. And you can call Canon support and ask them to mail you a free printed copy. I did that after seeing the mention on UHH.
http://gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/0/0300008700/01/pssx50hs-cug-en.pdf
http://gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/0/0300008700/01/pssx50hs-cug-en.pdf
Dec 30, 2013 11:41:39 #
Gerald W. wrote:
How do you like that Canon SX50? I have heard different comments about it. Would not mind having it as a second camera.
Gerald, there are many happy SX50 users on UHH! If you use the search function, you can see topics and posted images. I don't put the camera name in my titles, but all my "critter" shots were done with this camera.
For the money, it's quite awesome :thumbup: :thumbup:
Dec 30, 2013 11:45:07 #
Yes, I've printed out the manual....big one. I should've looked there.
Does this limit my picture taking somewhat having a narrow band of aperture openings?
I am pleased, so far, with the camera. I just need to experiment more with the "bells and whistles" on it. I hear the 50 x zoom alone is worth the money.
Does this limit my picture taking somewhat having a narrow band of aperture openings?
I am pleased, so far, with the camera. I just need to experiment more with the "bells and whistles" on it. I hear the 50 x zoom alone is worth the money.
Dec 30, 2013 15:29:52 #
Gerald W. wrote:
How do you like that Canon SX50? I have heard different comments about it. Would not mind having it as a second camera.
BEST camera I have had in a long time! My only other cameras that I still use are pocket-size Panasonic Lumix and Olympus, but for my more serious outings it is the SX50 (kept my SX40 as backup!).
For me it does as good as my film cameras for the photos I am interested in, and that zoom is so amazing for wildlife!! The turn on the 2x TC that is built in and get some terriffic closeups!
Dec 30, 2013 16:05:55 #
Mr_Mel wrote:
Yes, I've printed out the manual....big one. I should've looked there.
Does this limit my picture taking somewhat having a narrow band of aperture openings?
I am pleased, so far, with the camera. I just need to experiment more with the "bells and whistles" on it. I hear the 50 x zoom alone is worth the money.
Does this limit my picture taking somewhat having a narrow band of aperture openings?
I am pleased, so far, with the camera. I just need to experiment more with the "bells and whistles" on it. I hear the 50 x zoom alone is worth the money.
You'll get enough DOF for landscapes, I think - though I mostly have the zoom all the way out :) It's just a matter of getting used to what you have available.
Here are two landscapes:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-172126-1.html
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-171762-1.html
And one with the macro feature:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-159569-1.html
Dec 31, 2013 08:54:41 #
Wahawk wrote:
BEST camera I have had in a long time! My only other cameras that I still use are pocket-size Panasonic Lumix and Olympus, but for my more serious outings it is the SX50 (kept my SX40 as backup!).
For me it does as good as my film cameras for the photos I am interested in, and that zoom is so amazing for wildlife!! The turn on the 2x TC that is built in and get some terriffic closeups!
For me it does as good as my film cameras for the photos I am interested in, and that zoom is so amazing for wildlife!! The turn on the 2x TC that is built in and get some terriffic closeups!
:thumbup:
Dec 31, 2013 10:13:10 #
Love it. Not being able to afford the more expensive camera with various lenses, the SX50 has been a great alternative for me. Especially since it shoots in RAW. I mostly use Manual settings. i'ina
Dec 31, 2013 10:19:33 #
i'ina wrote:
Love it. Not being able to afford the more expensive camera with various lenses, the SX50 has been a great alternative for me. Especially since it shoots in RAW. I mostly use Manual settings. i'ina
The SX50 also sounds within my budget as I do not want to spend over $2,000 and more only to find that I am not a professional photographer, but just enjoy taking that casual and interesting pictures throughout the year. I'm going to check out the specs.
Dec 31, 2013 18:25:37 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.