Tamron 70-300 v. Nikon 70-300
Dec 28, 2013 10:23:07 #
I've reviewed several comparison tests and they seem to go both ways: some say Tamron is sharper at 300; others Nikon.
Any "real world" experiences to share?-- particularly someone who has used both? Both have the vibration reduction: VC/VR.
Thanks
Any "real world" experiences to share?-- particularly someone who has used both? Both have the vibration reduction: VC/VR.
Thanks
Dec 28, 2013 15:32:05 #
Hi there, I have the Nikon version which I am happy with but, as you know, I am a novice and have nothing to compare it with. If the prices are similar then I think it would be better to go with Nikon but if there is a big difference - well you pay your money, you take your chance. I also have the Nikon kit lens 18-105mm which I do find very sharp.
Dec 28, 2013 15:40:08 #
Play around here at this site and make your own decision.
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses
The site takes a bit to get use to, but hold a wealth of info on Cameras, sensors, lens, etc.
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses
The site takes a bit to get use to, but hold a wealth of info on Cameras, sensors, lens, etc.
Dec 29, 2013 11:21:51 #
Have you used their editing programs? Curious of to their abilities and which would be best.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.