Why use Snapsort???
Dec 24, 2013 13:11:07 #
To me, the side by side comparisons of cameras are like the computerized boxing matches between two fighters who have never met
Dec 24, 2013 14:00:31 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Snapsort claims the Panny LX7 has no high speed video which it does. Just one of many examples that can be seen.
snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-G15-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-LX7
snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-G15-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-LX7
Well......You have 2 choices.
You can either ignore it and any references to it.
OR, you can help it be better by using the 'Report Correction' about 1/4th of the way down the page.
Dec 24, 2013 14:51:08 #
Reliable source, not overly...you have to take it with a grain of salt. Most of their scores are based on a popularity contest. I usually use it to compare physical dimensions, and the DXO performance.
Dec 24, 2013 14:53:38 #
Racmanaz wrote:
I was just curious why people recomend the use of snapsort as a reliable source of information when Snapsort is habitually incorrect about the camera specs often?? :)
I figure it's one of many resources to compare cameras. Users and reviewers are other resources. Snapsort might put more value on a certain feature than I do, so I just see what they have to say.
Dec 24, 2013 15:25:50 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Cdouthitt wrote:
Reliable source, not overly...you have to take it with a grain of salt. Most of their scores are based on a popularity contest. I usually use it to compare physical dimensions, and the DXO performance.
Yes, I should probably give them some slack, it's not like I can't check other references on the specs. Sad thing is, I keep going back to Snapsnort for information grrrrrrrrrrrr....is that an addiction? :)
Dec 24, 2013 15:56:48 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Yes, I should probably give them some slack, it's not like I can't check other references on the specs. Sad thing is, I keep going back to Snapsnort for information grrrrrrrrrrrr....is that an addiction? :)
Yeah, one should kick. Go to DPReview first. They don't seem to hold their punches.
Dec 24, 2013 16:50:49 #
the times I've glanced at Snapsort the site seems to be real short on meaningful information so I normally pass it by. Whether you're looking for evaluations of cameras or any other consumer product I'm real suspect of any site that accepts free products from the manufacturers for a "test." If they do, they normally will pass "reviewing" a real dog (if they want to get any more freebies). I am also not sure that any smart manufacturer would supply a product for a "test" unless they've really checked it out first...so, it may not be typical of the item you might get. The only evaluations of real value are where the tester actually goes out and buys the product at retail and then tests it. I've noted in major camera magazines where they have a product "test" they also have a big ad for the same product somewhere in the publication. We all know that there are real duds out there in any consumer product line, but have you ever seen a "test" where it was revealed the item was a real "p-o-s"? I haven't...
Dec 24, 2013 17:41:34 #
Budnjax wrote:
We all know that there are real duds out there in any consumer product line, but have you ever seen a "test" where it was revealed the item was a real "p-o-s"? I haven't...
Actually, PZ does a very good job evaluating camera gear objectively. They rent most of their equipment, and I've often times read that something is a POS. Of course, they don't come right out and say this, but the meaning is the same.
Of course, my rule of thumb is to never rely 100% on just one review.
Dec 24, 2013 17:47:23 #
mdorn wrote:
Actually, PZ does a very good job evaluating camera gear objectively.
PZ?????
Dec 24, 2013 18:18:21 #
Dec 25, 2013 06:10:28 #
I like TechRadar for reliable reviews of all technology including cameras (http://www.techradar.com/)
The one I prefer is (http://www.ephotozine.com/) because the reviews are very thorough and use the same format each time.
I also look at Snapsport sometimes, DPReview I don't use due to the black background it makes it hard reading.
The one I prefer is (http://www.ephotozine.com/) because the reviews are very thorough and use the same format each time.
I also look at Snapsport sometimes, DPReview I don't use due to the black background it makes it hard reading.
Dec 25, 2013 07:48:02 #
I like Imaging-Resource for good, unbiased reviews and information about camera models.
--Beagleman
--Beagleman
Dec 25, 2013 09:49:59 #
sirlensalot
Loc: Arizona
Racmanaz wrote:
I was just curious why people recomend the use of snapsort as a reliable source of information when Snapsort is habitually incorrect about the camera specs often?? :)
Never recommend them, but do read from time to time. I think it's a good place to look to get an overall view of the comparison, but have always followed it up with other more serious reviews. Have learned to take most reviews with a grain of salt. Most reviewers are never really critical of the flaws. Have never seen a review that actually recommended not purchasing a particular camera or lens. For the most part, they seem to like every product they test.
Dec 25, 2013 19:34:08 #
redrocktom
Loc: Sedona
btfthree wrote:
I am a newby and have been lurking for awhile just... (show quote)
When you make your buy, please let me know. I also have the d7100, E-M1, and K-3 on my short list, and am wrestling with the same decision. Thanks.
Dec 26, 2013 03:11:22 #
Racmanaz wrote:
I was just curious why people recomend the use of snapsort as a reliable source of information when Snapsort is habitually incorrect about the camera specs often?? :)
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Thank you! A terribly inaccurate site. Constantly getting specs incorrect and their scoring system is next to useless as they allow comparisons between apples and oranges.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.