A lesson in lights
Dec 20, 2011 20:11:58 #
Dec 20, 2011 20:13:38 #
Dec 20, 2011 20:14:02 #
No flash and much lower speed would have been ghostly!!!
(But who wants to stand in the cold????) :shock: :twisted: :-D
(But who wants to stand in the cold????) :shock: :twisted: :-D
Dec 20, 2011 20:18:10 #
It sure makes a radical difference, doesn't it?
Sort of like VanGogh saying: Brush, or no brush? Which way today?
Interesting post...thanks!
Sort of like VanGogh saying: Brush, or no brush? Which way today?
Interesting post...thanks!
Dec 20, 2011 20:28:41 #
ShakyShutter wrote:
Is that Mick Jagger on the left side there?
Elvis was next to me
Dec 20, 2011 20:30:27 #
English_Wolf wrote:
No flash and much lower speed would have been ghostly!!!
(But who wants to stand in the cold????) :shock: :twisted: :-D
(But who wants to stand in the cold????) :shock: :twisted: :-D
I assume you mean lower shutter speed. I'm sure the flakes would have been a line vertically.
Dec 20, 2011 20:31:27 #
Exactly. Hence the ghost effect, the background would have been sharp yet blurry, like a ghost.
Dec 20, 2011 23:24:51 #
saside wrote:
No flash / flash
Flash and snow is fun to play with. Here is one of mine that looks like falling stars almost, hope you don't mind.
Dec 21, 2011 09:27:00 #
Judi
Loc: Oregon
Have also experienced those "Et" blobs at night, and tried to duplicate the effect the following night. After several trials all I can figure out is that the moisture content of the air was rather high - very light mist. Kinda cool though!!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.