Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Photo Critique Section
Trees
Page <prev 2 of 2
Dec 10, 2013 21:36:03   #
Gauss Loc: Earth
 
Bmac wrote:
lighthouse wrote:
What sets the good ones apart? Its not the subject. It's light and composition!
Okay. But I would go with all of them, including the subject. All elements are important. I guess we simply disagree. :)


If I understand what lighthouse is saying, it might go something like this. I'm hiking and see this cool, gnarly pine tree near tree line. If I just take a shot or two, they're snapshots with subject first and composition and light an afterthought or not considered. But, if I take time to check different angles, different shooting positions, the light, etc. this will affect my shot - hopefully for the better. Maybe I wait for a cloud to cover the sun, or I decide on a close-up of part of the tree rather than the whole thing. This is putting the subject after the composition and light, even though the subject ultimately came first as it started the process.

minniev wrote:
I know this is all going to get deleted because we are hijacking a thread. But I think this discussion is so interesting, I wish there were a spot for it within this forum. It seems that we could have room for a thread to discuss hints for taking better photos as well as sharing our photos and opinions of them. Anyway, I tend to agree that it's the light first. After light, I look for a possible subject, then a way to compose it. My water lily photos are a prime example. I could find nothing else to anchor that wonderful light, so I composed using what I could find. I have been known to take pictures of light. Some of them have been well received, others just junk.
I know this is all going to get deleted because we... (show quote)


I don't think this is really a hijacking because it does apply to OP. I'm guessing that Bloke not only likes bare trees but would like to take better pictures of them. Like him, and lighthouse, I've got pictures like this too. And considering what lighthouse said, it's because I did subject first. It's a habit I want to eliminate; I want composition and light to become my habit. Threads like this, in this forum will help me start down that path.

There is another thing that's important in making a great photograph - craftsmanship. A blogger I recently read put it this way, great craftsmanship is necessary but not sufficient to make a great photograph. It's the composition, light, story - the artistry - that ultimately bumps an image. Being one who has a large collection of regular photos, I use them to build my skills at craftsmanship - as minnie has done here, essentially making the most of an ordinary image. What I learn can be applied to my better images as well as to my thinking when I'm shooting and trying to put artistry before subject.

Reply
Dec 10, 2013 21:44:49   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Very well put Gauss.
I'd also like to add that i very much like what the girls did with post work too.
They elevated this image to beyond a snapshot by seeing something that I did not see in the original.
They made the shot about the trees and it has magically transformed them from "trees in a big picture" to the "dominant element".
Maybe they brought it up to the original vision that Bloke had for this image?

Gauss wrote:
I don't think this is really a hijacking because it does apply to OP. I'm guessing that Bloke not only likes bare trees but would like to take better pictures of them. Like him, and lighthouse, I've got pictures like this too. And considering what lighthouse said, it's because I did subject first. It's a habit I want to eliminate; I want composition and light to become my habit. Threads like this, in this forum will help me start down that path.

There is another thing that's important in making a great photograph - craftsmanship. A blogger I recently read put it this way, great craftsmanship is necessary but not sufficient to make a great photograph. It's the composition, light, story - the artistry - that ultimately bumps an image. Being one who has a large collection of regular photos, I use them to build my skills at craftsmanship - as minnie has done here, essentially making the most of an ordinary image. What I learn can be applied to my better images as well as to my thinking when I'm shooting and trying to put artistry before subject.
I don't think this is really a hijacking because i... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 10, 2013 21:46:45   #
Bloke Loc: Waynesboro, Pennsylvania
 
minniev wrote:
Since I have taken part in a partial hijack of your thread I want to come back and respond to your actual photo. Though it has been pronounced snapshot by lighthouse (whose opinions I highly respect), I like it anyway. I have taken many snapshots and hoard thousands of them on my external drives. Some I have managed to polish into real photos.

I too like the bare trees 7 I like the cows wandering about on hillsides. You have nice clouds there, but I think you can get more mileage out of them by adding clarity to them and de-brightening the sky a little. I followed HT's lead in cropping the stuff on the right, also a sliver from the sky. Then, as I sometimes do, I got carried away and applied some NIK filters. It would look better if I'd had my desktop computer to work with instead of this crummy little laptop screen, but I'm posting my example. So, the composition may not be 5-star, but I think with a little tinkering you can have a nice keeper.
Since I have taken part in a partial hijack of you... (show quote)


I like the sky you got... It has a lot more 'oomph' than my original!

Reply
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Dec 10, 2013 21:52:09   #
Bloke Loc: Waynesboro, Pennsylvania
 
Gauss wrote:
I don't think this is really a hijacking because it does apply to OP. I'm guessing that Bloke not only likes bare trees but would like to take better pictures of them. Like him, and lighthouse, I've got pictures like this too. And considering what lighthouse said, it's because I did subject first. It's a habit I want to eliminate; I want composition and light to become my habit. Threads like this, in this forum will help me start down that path.



Yes, I want to learn to take better photos. I am a bit put-out by the suggestion (whoever it was from...) that I just snapped this and went on my way. This is one of several hundred shots I took on a cold and windy day. I tried many different angles and compositions. This just happened to be the one I chose to post first. I am not claiming that the others will be world-beaters or anything, just that I *did* spend a lot of time working on composition, and trying to get the right light.

Reply
Dec 10, 2013 22:15:37   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Hi Bloke, it was me.
I didn't mean that you didn't work at it.
I suppose part of what i meant was that sometimes the composition or the light might just not be available, no matter how long we spend at it.
We want there to be a shot there because we like the subject, but its just not there.
Maybe the answer is to go in a different season, or a different time of day, or closer, or with a different lens.
Looking at the girls very slight crops of your original, a longer lens and a touch of processing made the day.
I have no problem saying that you and they saw something in it that I didn't see.

Reply
Dec 10, 2013 22:33:16   #
Bloke Loc: Waynesboro, Pennsylvania
 
lighthouse wrote:
Hi Bloke, it was me.
I didn't mean that you didn't work at it.
I suppose part of what i meant was that sometimes the composition or the light might just not be available, no matter how long we spend at it.
We want there to be a shot there because we like the subject, but its just not there.
Maybe the answer is to go in a different season, or a different time of day, or closer, or with a different lens.
Looking at the girls very slight crops of your original, a longer lens and a touch of processing made the day.
I have no problem saying that you and they saw something in it that I didn't see.
Hi Bloke, it was me. br I didn't mean that you did... (show quote)


That's ok. My problem is in seeing the 'good' shot myself... Everything I shoot, I think is good when I shoot it, or else I wouldn't bother. I am just learning the whole PP side of things, and I manipulate the photos to what *I* think is good. I guess I have trouble in knowing *why* a shot looks better with a different edit. I am using an SX50, so I don't have different lenses, although I do have a heap of focal lengths to play with.

I am just trying to learn *what* makes a photo *good*, as opposed to a snapshot... I know what I like, but then someone changes it, and I can see that it is better. Why can't I see the better picture that is in there at the start?
It's late, and I am just rambling here. I have a lot to learn - and that's why I hang out here!

Reply
Dec 11, 2013 00:35:09   #
Heirloom Tomato Loc: Oregon
 
Bloke wrote:
That's ok. My problem is in seeing the 'good' shot myself... Everything I shoot, I think is good when I shoot it, or else I wouldn't bother. I am just learning the whole PP side of things, and I manipulate the photos to what *I* think is good. I guess I have trouble in knowing *why* a shot looks better with a different edit. I am using an SX50, so I don't have different lenses, although I do have a heap of focal lengths to play with.

I am just trying to learn *what* makes a photo *good*, as opposed to a snapshot... I know what I like, but then someone changes it, and I can see that it is better. Why can't I see the better picture that is in there at the start?
It's late, and I am just rambling here. I have a lot to learn - and that's why I hang out here!
That's ok. My problem is in seeing the 'good' sh... (show quote)


I think this shot provided a good example. What you think is good might be even better with a little pp work. This example showed how much was hidden in your sky just waiting to be brought out. More color was there in the field, too. It's well worth spending the time learning how to make some basic adjustments so you can bring out the beauty that is already in your photos just waiting to come out.

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2013 06:38:49   #
minniev Loc: MIssissippi
 
lighthouse wrote:
Hi Bloke, it was me.
I didn't mean that you didn't work at it.
I suppose part of what i meant was that sometimes the composition or the light might just not be available, no matter how long we spend at it.
We want there to be a shot there because we like the subject, but its just not there.
Maybe the answer is to go in a different season, or a different time of day, or closer, or with a different lens.
Looking at the girls very slight crops of your original, a longer lens and a touch of processing made the day.
I have no problem saying that you and they saw something in it that I didn't see.
Hi Bloke, it was me. br I didn't mean that you did... (show quote)


For the sake of this rather interesting discussion, I asked myself what might have made me take this shot, if I were Bloke. May not be his steps, but some of them might be similar.
1. The light looks pretty good this afternoon, soft and diffused, no harshness. Think I'll go look for something to shoot. Colors may be a little dulled out but I can deal with that in PP.
2. Those are nice clouds forming over yonder, need to get them in the shot, I can make them pop with (fill in the blank- photoshop, elements, NIK viveza, Topaz)
3. Aha! My favorite, a clump of bare trees. Those lacy branches will look good against those clouds but I'll probably have to fight halo-ing in PP.
4. Got some decent overlapping layers here, trees in front, fields in middle, farm and more trees in back. Let me get my big trees out of the center of the frame.
5. Yeah, that small tree on the hill in the field can give me some balance on the left. Big trees on right, little tree on left
6. Great! a cute cow standing beside little tree. Even better. Be sure to make her show up in post.

To me, it is first about light but bad light seldom keeps me from trying. After light, it turns into something like baking a cake. I assemble the ingredients - light, subject, composition, color to see if I have enough ingredients to make something. It is interesting to know how others go about it this process.

Reply
Dec 11, 2013 12:10:43   #
Heirloom Tomato Loc: Oregon
 
minniev wrote:
For the sake of this rather interesting discussion, I asked myself what might have made me take this shot, if I were Bloke. May not be his steps, but some of them might be similar.
1. The light looks pretty good this afternoon, soft and diffused, no harshness. Think I'll go look for something to shoot. Colors may be a little dulled out but I can deal with that in PP.
2. Those are nice clouds forming over yonder, need to get them in the shot, I can make them pop with (fill in the blank- photoshop, elements, NIK viveza, Topaz)
3. Aha! My favorite, a clump of bare trees. Those lacy branches will look good against those clouds but I'll probably have to fight halo-ing in PP.
4. Got some decent overlapping layers here, trees in front, fields in middle, farm and more trees in back. Let me get my big trees out of the center of the frame.
5. Yeah, that small tree on the hill in the field can give me some balance on the left. Big trees on right, little tree on left
6. Great! a cute cow standing beside little tree. Even better. Be sure to make her show up in post.

To me, it is first about light but bad light seldom keeps me from trying. After light, it turns into something like baking a cake. I assemble the ingredients - light, subject, composition, color to see if I have enough ingredients to make something. It is interesting to know how others go about it this process.
For the sake of this rather interesting discussion... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: You take great photos and also express yourself very well, Minniev. Thanks for sharing this thought process of how photos come to be.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Photo Critique Section
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.