Ugly Crane
Dec 6, 2013 09:33:32 #
Shot this on all the way out. The eye came out fair but would like to show better. Waiting on the PSE 12 to arrive.
Lee
Lee
SX50 and cropped in LR5.3
Dec 6, 2013 09:48:29 #
Hi Lee. I have lots of experience of pushing the sensor of the SX50 beyond its limits :)
I checked the exif and yep, you were all the way to 100x + you cropped about 2/3 of it so this heron must have been a loooong way off :)
Using just the optical zoom (50x) will give you best results. You can turn off the digital zoom, or just be aware of where you are by noticing the change in color of the bar in the viewfinder/LCD.
If you are shooting in a mode other than auto or RAW, you can access the in-camera teleconverter. That seems to give a bit better result than the digital zoom. You can choose 1.5x (equiv 75x) or 2x (equiv 100x).
If you'd like to see a comparison, I can post a heron photo that was taken at 1.5x and cropped slightly.
I checked the exif and yep, you were all the way to 100x + you cropped about 2/3 of it so this heron must have been a loooong way off :)
Using just the optical zoom (50x) will give you best results. You can turn off the digital zoom, or just be aware of where you are by noticing the change in color of the bar in the viewfinder/LCD.
If you are shooting in a mode other than auto or RAW, you can access the in-camera teleconverter. That seems to give a bit better result than the digital zoom. You can choose 1.5x (equiv 75x) or 2x (equiv 100x).
If you'd like to see a comparison, I can post a heron photo that was taken at 1.5x and cropped slightly.
Dec 6, 2013 10:59:56 #
I looks like your camera didn't keep up with your good intentions. This bird is pretty blurry, and even PS12 can't help you ..... you'd just end up with sharper blur lines. I think Linda has given you some great hints on getting a better shot next time. When you do, please post if for comparison.
Dec 6, 2013 11:57:44 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Hi Lee. I have lots of experience of pushing the s... (show quote)
Yes Linda, please do. I've been shooting in raw + jpg because I want to learn PP. That is going to be my stay inside Winter project. If it gets below 60F I start turning blue. Thanks for the info.
Lee
Dec 6, 2013 12:00:09 #
Bob Yankle wrote:
I looks like your camera didn't keep up with your good intentions. This bird is pretty blurry, and even PS12 can't help you ..... you'd just end up with sharper blur lines. I think Linda has given you some great hints on getting a better shot next time. When you do, please post if for comparison.
Thanks for the comments, Bob. Going to start doing more of the tripod, too.
Lee
Dec 6, 2013 12:08:14 #
Old Boots wrote:
Thanks for the comments, Bob. Going to start doing more of the tripod, too.
Lee
Lee
Lee, that's a very good idea. I finally figured that out for myself. The PERFECT addition to a good tripod is a remote cable release so that when it comes time to trip the shutter, your hand is nowhere near the camera itself.
Dec 6, 2013 12:13:32 #
Old Boots wrote:
Yes Linda, please do. I've been shooting in raw + jpg because I want to learn PP. That is going to be my stay inside Winter project. If it gets below 60F I start turning blue. Thanks for the info.
Lee
Lee
#1 is the full frame (I shoot 3:2) and 1.5x in-camera teleconverter. I guess with raw you can use the digital zoom, so it'd be equiv. to 75x.
#2 is a crop of #1 to approximately the size file you posted.
Being in sunlight helps a lot, as does having good contrast between your subject and its surroundings so auto-focus can lock on :) Use the smallest focusing frame available too.
Dec 6, 2013 12:18:32 #
Also, I tried playing with special effects on your shot. I'll only post one version here :)
This is with poster edges in PSE 12 and a little adjustment to mid-tones and highlights. But I also tried darkening, and in Picasa, adding vignette + a 1960's look. It was fun and if you do want to hang onto the shot, you might try playing around to see if anything suits your fancy.
This is with poster edges in PSE 12 and a little adjustment to mid-tones and highlights. But I also tried darkening, and in Picasa, adding vignette + a 1960's look. It was fun and if you do want to hang onto the shot, you might try playing around to see if anything suits your fancy.
Dec 6, 2013 12:25:01 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
#1 is the full frame (I shoot 3:2) and 1.5x in-camera teleconverter. I guess with raw you can use the digital zoom, so it'd be equiv. to 75x.
#2 is a crop of that to approximately the size file you posted.
Being in sunlight helps a lot, as does having good contrast between your subject and its surroundings so auto-focus can lock on :)
#2 is a crop of that to approximately the size file you posted.
Being in sunlight helps a lot, as does having good contrast between your subject and its surroundings so auto-focus can lock on :)
As good as the SX50 is (and this is true of my FujiFilm X-S1 as well), there is a distinct difference in the resolution between a P&S and the same photo taken with a DSLR with long glass. I notice it in both the photos you posted. There is nothing wrong with your photos, they're well exposed, good focus and such. But it reminds me of why I could never give up my DSLRs.
Dec 6, 2013 12:26:25 #
Bob Yankle wrote:
As good as the SX50 is (and this is true of my FujiFilm X-S1 as well), there is a distinct difference in the resolution between a P&S and the same photo taken with a DSLR with long glass. I notice it in both the photos you posted. There is nothing wrong with your photos, they're well exposed, good focus and such. But it reminds me of why I could never give up my DSLRs.
And yet, it is the P&S (with the long reach) that stays in the car while I'm driving around, while the DLSRs are only hauled out for special occasions.
Dec 6, 2013 12:26:34 #
Bob Yankle wrote:
As good as the SX50 is (and this is true of my FujiFilm X-S1 as well), there is a distinct difference in the resolution between a P&S and the same photo taken with a DSLR with long glass. I notice it in both the photos you posted. There is nothing wrong with your photos, they're well exposed, good focus and such. But it reminds me of why I could never give up my DSLRs.
Yes, the discussion of image quality from a $350 camera/lens to gear that costs $2500 (or more) is one that rages on.
The temptation for Old Boots, and all us SX50 users, is what I stated in first response: we attempt to take shots of small objects very, very far away :)
Dec 7, 2013 04:59:28 #
lighthouse
Loc: No Fixed Abode
Lee, its crap, its too soft.
Pushed the camera too far.
Its a poor snapshot.
Pushed the camera too far.
Its a poor snapshot.
Old Boots wrote:
Shot this on all the way out. The eye came out fair but would like to show better. Waiting on the PSE 12 to arrive.
Lee
Lee
Dec 7, 2013 09:13:19 #
lighthouse wrote:
Lee, its crap, its too soft.
Pushed the camera too far.
Its a poor snapshot.
Pushed the camera too far.
Its a poor snapshot.
I guess I could say I'm an artist and hand painted it. Thanks for looking.
Lee
Dec 7, 2013 11:36:48 #
Old Boots wrote:
Shot this on all the way out. The eye came out fair but would like to show better. Waiting on the PSE 12 to arrive.
Lee
Lee
Old Boots,
Suggestion: Become a hunter with a camera, use the same instincts you would with a .22 single shot rifle.
Turn off Digital Zoom, use only Optical Zoom, and get as close as possible to your target. Your camera can only guess as to what you intend on capturing, your digital editing software can control the effects of digital zoom by your mouse movements.
You might practice on some of your animals on the ranch, and don't be shy on using the shaded side of the barn for a background.
Michael G
Dec 8, 2013 14:41:14 #
Armadillo wrote:
Old Boots, br br Suggestion: Become a hunter wit... (show quote)
Thanks Michael. I think you and Linda are right. I'm trying to reach out too far just because I can. I'll get over it.
Lee
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.